Jump to content
SAU Community

R32 With Bodykit. Whats Ur Opinion?good Or Bad


jonesl
 Share

Recommended Posts

Got a URAS bodykit. slaped it on.. not sure how i feel about it.

Iv always said to mates BODY KITS SUCK!!! Just dump it an get rims.

lol. an look what iv done.

wat your thoughs guys. all input appreciated.

post-52856-1217997574_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a URAS bodykit. slaped it on.. not sure how i feel about it.

Iv always said to mates BODY KITS SUCK!!! Just dump it an get rims.

lol. an look what iv done.

wat your thoughs guys. all input appreciated.

not a fan of this one....dont mind the vertex kits on 32's tho.

if you like it dont worry what neone else thinks imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Need some nice wheels, something like Work Emotion XT7.. probably 18 x 9.5 + 20 offset would be perfect

Hey I actually have those exact wheels for sale, click my signature for more details :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no intentions of offending, but my opinion is i've always thought bodykits suited skylines and silvias except for R32.

the only thing that i think looks clean for a street R32 is the GTR front bar and the rest kept standard, but in my eyes a full bodykit looks tacky, big and too out there unless it's a full spec drift pig.

Need some nice wheels, something like Work Emotion XT7.. probably 18 x 9.5 + 20 offset would be perfect

Hey I actually have those exact wheels for sale, click my signature for more details :banana:

lol @ sales skills. haha :D

Edited by dmr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HAH. agreed, UBU top sales skills. you by any chance a used car salesman ?

Thanks for the pics SL!M... your 32 is cutting it nicley. = inspiration =D

i agree, i dont like bodykits much. but what i do like is how they make you car look DUMPEDD AS!!!!

thanks for the input guys. =)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks good :D . thos front bars are normally really low,how are you finding it? hit anything yet lol?

AM I EVER!! SO LOWW!!!! i see speed humpss.. i have to find a new route home. kinda inconveniet.. but this is the price we pay for lookin good. =P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to say it's bad. Vertex or BN or whatever its called, it's just way to over dramatic. It would look so much better if the "flare" wasn't that far out, and the little kink was just shallower. Even a new set of wheels wouldn't be able to save it. In all honesty, it's one of the worst kits I've ever seen on a 32 regardless if its JDM or not. I hope that didn't hurt your feelings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd have to say it's bad. Vertex or BN or whatever its called, it's just way to over dramatic. It would look so much better if the "flare" wasn't that far out, and the little kink was just shallower. Even a new set of wheels wouldn't be able to save it. In all honesty, it's one of the worst kits I've ever seen on a 32 regardless if its JDM or not. I hope that didn't hurt your feelings.

aha. far from hurt my feelings.keep it coming.. i actuly couldnt agree with u more. Well not about the "worst ever". (=veilside) but yes if it was less flared an just more stragiht down. would be better. i thought about cutting and bending the kink out. re glassing it back up... wonder how that would go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Different strokes for different folks really and like already stated the fitment of the kit isn't really the best which lets it down a little as well.

I've had a kitted 32 and a stock 32 before and my current one will not have a kit, its lowered will be wearing 34 GTR rims and stay with the type M front, skirts and rear but maybe pods???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Shaft speed would be the same, however it's how long they hold it there for and repeated conditions. FWIW half way down the main straight at SMSP I'm bouncing off 4th with a 8600RPM limiter. That shaft would be spinning at 8600RPM for a few seconds before I need to smash the brakes, by T2 it's getting close to that speed again. Now a drag car/roll race car would see that shaft speed for a 1 to 2 secs then they would coast, hit the brakes and that's it.
    • With same diff ratio, tyre diameter and road speed, the tailshaft rpm is the same regardless of the gearbag's ratio. Given that very quick drag cars are probably doing similar road speeds to the fastest circuit cars (circa 300 km/h), and there will be many of either category that can't go that fast and so you'd have inummerable matchups between drag and circuit car speeds at smaller numbers, and given that they are probably using rather similar tyre diameters and probably using similar diff ratios, and...where any of those numbers were different they could quite easily be in opposite directions thus cancelling out.... I think you'd find that there'd be more similarity than difference in tailshaft speed between these two use cases, no?
    • they might see those prop shaft speeds for 1 to 2 secs only 
    • A year of slogging through this bearing issue and finally fixed. What a nightmare. The oil pressure increase did not fix the problem. If you would like to read all the details in case you ever run into a similar issue visit my thread on Yellow Bullet. https://www.yellowbullet.com/threads/continuous-rod-bearing-issues.2689569/?post_id=74193031&nested_view=1&sortby=oldest#post-74193031 In the end the rod bearings themselves were the issue. I had switched from ACL (first engine) to King because that was all we could get at the time and I thought nothing of it. Put the ACL's back in after a year of taking the pan off multiple times to change many things. Issue resolved. Can't believe it was just the bearings themselves all along. It has now been about two years since I drove the car on the street or had it at the track. At some point I had installed all solid and spherical bushings in the rear but had never aligned it since it just went on and off the dyno. Alignment was the first thing to do. (Old photo but same concept) Then I took the transmission out and went through it. This was my first gearset install and I've done about 15 since this one and learned a lot and wanted to apply some of these tweaks to mine. The aftermarket shift forks take very well to some modification and I wanted to make that change. Shifts are now super smooth and no having to find the gear. I also recut the 5th and reverse shift sleeves - always wanted to try this and see how well it works. It works very well! No grinds or having to do a second attempt going into reverse and 5th is perfect. Before During After Going back in In rummaging through my spare trans parts box I found the only parts I've ever broke on a stock trans; the 3-4 shift fork - twice!  
    • It also depends on gearbox ratio. Those drag cars running 7s passes aren't doing it on an overdrive gear ratio (probably). 1:1 is "fine", the critical RPM for a 50' single driveshaft in chromemoly is 6900rpm.... ....but when you shift into 5th and use 0:73 or 0:8 it all changes. Do you know their rear diff ratio? etc. That's the stuff that matters with regards to it. Whether it actually matters given your use application is also relevent. You may never get into those scenarios, like most ruined GTR's from Western Sydney don't :p
×
×
  • Create New...