Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon this depends a lot on dyno, setup etc. What dyno were you running this one? Do you have high mount manifold/plenum/cams? How much boost?

I must admit I have never seen what these will do on an RB25DET though I am most keen to try and push mine hard at some point. I have seen Hondas/Mitsis getting well over 400whp/300kw @ wheels with these on pump gas on Dynojet and Dynapack dynos and mine has made 280kw @ wheels on pump gas without even really trying.

I am quite confident that I'd crack 330kw @ wheels on the turbo I have (.82a/r GT3076R) on a hub dyno with a decent manifold, cams and a decent hit of boost but the way the dynos read in Oz I'd consider a GT3582R for 330kw really - as much as anything just because a GT30R will definitely be at the high end of its capability on 330kw @ wheels whereas a GT3582R would be humming.

I take it you're from America, the highlighted sentence should read; "but the way the dynos read in the rest of the world, I'd consider a GT3582R for 330kw really" :D

Americans have their own way of measuring HP, that gives higher readings than the rest of the world. :cool:

I take it you're from America, the highlighted sentence should read; "but the way the dynos read in the rest of the world, I'd consider a GT3582R for 330kw really" :D Americans have their own way of measuring HP, that gives higher readings than the rest of the world. :cool:

No actually I am from NZ. Dyno Dynamics DO seem like they read lower than most other dynos anyone anywhere use - the others are all in far closer proximity in terms of results than the DDs. Mustang dynos (used in the US mainly) are pretty close to DD though. Majority rules, Oz are the odd one out.

Its not that Americans/everyone else have happy dynos, its that your ones are low reading - you'll find that the reason most people who can afford it who are going for hub dynos aren't doing so for the bigger numbers... if everyone measure using the same unit it becomes all comparable, the "bigger than dyno dynamics" measured numbers end up just making it like a different currency.

Because of the consistancy of the use of Hub dynos around the world I can get a good idea of what to expect out of my car - people have tried every set up under the sun in the states, its just a matter of finding it. I know that my turbo on C16 on a good setup can make 550whp/410kw @ wheels on a hub dyno - and I know what 280kw @ wheels equates to roughly in the real world so I can ascertain that its going to be good if I max it out. I know that people regularly get over 450whp on pump gas with a good setup, or ~335kw @ wheels on a hub dyno - and I know that people with similar mods to me are making around 250kw @ wheels on dyno dynamics.

If I were to use that to make a conservative thumb sucks I'd say the difference is at most around 12% between a DD and a hub dyno from the above comments. If that were so, 300kw @ wheels should be the normal target for a .82a/r GT3076R with a bit of head room on pump gas, or if you are going to be ruthless and put "race gas" into it and crank the boost you should be able to make 360-370kw @ wheels. Those readings would result in very happy cars :D

I reckon this depends a lot on dyno, setup etc. What dyno were you running this one? Do you have high mount manifold/plenum/cams? How much boost?

I must admit I have never seen what these will do on an RB25DET though I am most keen to try and push mine hard at some point. I have seen Hondas/Mitsis getting well over 400whp/300kw @ wheels with these on pump gas on Dynojet and Dynapack dynos and mine has made 280kw @ wheels on pump gas without even really trying.

I am quite confident that I'd crack 330kw @ wheels on the turbo I have (.82a/r GT3076R) on a hub dyno with a decent manifold, cams and a decent hit of boost but the way the dynos read in Oz I'd consider a GT3582R for 330kw really - as much as anything just because a GT30R will definitely be at the high end of its capability on 330kw @ wheels whereas a GT3582R would be humming.

hope this answer what ive done.there is more that i have not listed yet.

as for dyno its a dyno dynamic at croydon racing developments

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Mo...tml&hl=gtrs

Interesting thing this up to and around 290-300 Kw . Obviously the RB25 factory exhaust manifold will only go so far flow wise and I suppose HKS intended those Pro S turbos to live within its capabilities . Personally I think a GT3037/GT3076R 56T has more in it than 320 Kw but like most turbos it needs large A/R turbine housings to run it to its limit .

Cubes I would be very tempted to beg/borrow/steal a 1.06 A/R IW turbine housing because I think your 3 liter would be more free reving and with more advanced timing should gain in most areas except the very bottom end where it shouldn't be lacking anyway , what low WOT torque it lost may mean less traction loss at the same time in a RWD car .

Once you reduce the turbine inlet pressure you shouldn't have the IW issues because its the pressure and velocity that goes against integral waste gates , pressure wanting to force the gate open and high velocity meaning the gas not wanting to make the sharp right hander and flow out through the gates hole .

Not my money I know but food for thought , cheers A .

BTW I'll be trying for as close to 9.5 static CR and Pon Cams in my 33 25 because this has not been tried and I think pump fuels and turbos can nowdays cope with it .

Traction really isn't a problem even with it making 200rwkw at 3500rpm and 256rwkw @ 4000rpm. 200rwkw with the vg30det turbo used to be a problem until I pushed in 12mm of cradle rake, new shocks/springs and better tyres.

Now once the tyres are a tad warm second gear only slightly chirps and third gear simply hooks up unless you hit section of road that is a little uneven.

I've had comments it looks like a 4wd the way it lunges away through second and when clicking third.

First gear sure it spins but thats what the 3ltr is for; slightly short shift it doesn't drop off boost it just picks up and goes.

It actually feels like if I were to shove a set of RA1's on the rear I would have zero traction problems and could do with some more boost through the mid.

The 1.06 will feel lazy creating traction problems in wet weather and loose that throttle response/control as the larger turbine housings tend to make all their boost within a smaller rpm window.

The .82 however windmills from basically off idle which makes brisk driving in wet weather and poor road conditions extremely easy.

All though I have not driven a GT30 with both the .8 and 1.06 thats my perception from driving both a GT35 .82 and 1.06 both on an RB30DET.

IMO for the 2.5 ltr .8 rear max for the 3ltr .8-.9 max regardless of the turbo size you are running.

I really think if I went a 1.06 the car under normal driving conditions would be slower. Sure big rpm launch at the drags it might be quicker but thats really not what I want out of the car.

If I want more than 320rwkw but under 390rwkw I've decided the GT35 .82 is not a big step away BUT it requires nice exhaust manifold, inlet and most likely cams with more lift if I don't want to run huge amounts of PULP unfriendly boost.

The way the car is now with ~20psi through the mid from ~3200rpm (when on road, loaded on the dyno it can see 20psi just under 3000rpm) is awesome; tougher actuator and push another 2-3psi in up top I believe it will pretty much max out the combination and should touch 320rwkw. Sure there may be another 10-20rwkw absolute max if I run the turbo well in to compressor choke.

10-20rwkw is not worth the quick spool, windmill and mid range power of the .82 especially if traction is not a problem.

With regards to compressor choke. the GT3076 comp map states ~525hp. 525hp is 391kw at the fly. Minus the usual 70-75rwkw drive train loss at this power level and we have 316-321rwkw. Close enough for me. :D

--------

Warlord,

You've spent a lot of $$ on little bits that probably didn't need replacing for your power level.

Mine was a budget performance bang for buck build. I did go a little overboard with having the head ported/polished and valve deshroud but I seriously believe it was money well spent as fuel economy is awesome even with the large cams and it seems to be making more power easier than other rb25det's and r32 rb25de heads on rb30 bottom ends with similar setups.

Hell I'm still running the std coils that were breaking down at 12psi until I siliconed them over a year ago. Now 20psi odd and they are still trucking.

They won't be replaced until I have to. :banana:

i guess you build to your bugged if its tight or not,

have you run your car down the 1/4 yet cubes

only reason i ask is ive got a private day on the 17-8 and was wondering what you get to compare.

Unfortunately Adelaide is useless. We have no drag strip.

Budget/priorities it is. I've wasted too much $$ in the past on cars this time around I decided to do it for as stock as looking performance only. Lots of fan dangled bits this time around does not interest me.

Hence the build of the rb30 and R32 chassis to obtain absolute max average power in a light weight car and everything literally looks 100% stock.

As power goals continually increase and the car is just a weekender I'm really considering the purchase of a cheap tidy 4door R32 GTS4 and dropping an RB30DET in to that with a nice little GT4088r and setting it up for track only, it will be street driven but chances are won't last long as they are hot on defects here in SA.

I have yet to hit the dash with a vid cam @ 302rwkw as its still a little hairy but previously with a little over 260rwkw it would zip to 100km/h in a shade over 4secs by idling it off the line. No big rpm launches. It would then go on to hit 180km/h in ~9secs. Unsure if you run a Z32 afm but for reference mine is hitting ~5volts.

cubes, we should meet up when im back at the end of the year, id love to check out your 3litre, might convert me over dropping a 26 into it!

would be good fun to do some rolling run comparisons as well, and hopefully my gtr will be on the road by then too!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
    • Every one has seemed to of have missed . . . . . . . The Mazda Cosmo . . . . . . what a MACHINE ! !
×
×
  • Create New...