Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Originally posted by 2fardown

Just because you get beaten by stock standard auto magnas. :shake:

hey no fair!

you guys all drive heavily modded skylines and forget what a standard skyline is like.

if this thread refers to standard cars i rekon the soarer...

Waz.

These are some factory figures from a reliable internet site- if there is such a thing:

Skyline R33 GTS25T:

187kw @ 6400rpm

295nm @ 4800rpm

7000rpm redline

1390 kg

6.18 seconds 0-100

14.39 seconds 400m

2.5 GT-Turbo:

208kW @ 6200rpm

362Nm @ 4800rpm

7250rpm redline

1600 kg

7.00 seconds 0-100km/h

15.06 seconds 400m

You fellas can extrapolate what you want from those figures. Just putting everyone on the same page.

There seems to be a lot of people who judge 'near-equal' performace cars be their kerb weight. So just out of curiousity i took some figures from the Holden website about various VY Commodores, as these seem to be the baseline car when people talk about weight; they always get mentioned somewhere along the line. Anyway, here you go.

SV8 Manual: 1638 kg

SV8 Auto: 1645 kg

SS Manual: 1658 kg

SS Auto: 1664 kg

SS UTE Manual: 1618 kg

SS UTE Auto: 1624 kg

245kW @ 5200 rpm

470Nm @ 4400 rpm

Looking at the torque figure, I wouldn't be surprised if a TT soarer can beat a GTS-t. That's an extra of almost almost 70Nm!

Driving it, the extra torque will also make the seat in the pants feels it's faster!!!

1jz's are factory under-rated, like 2jz's, rb26's and vg30dett's all are under the whole japanese 206kw bs. why do u think both the 1jz and 2jz are rated at like 206kw?? tell me that the 2jz aint got more power. anyways

my mate has an auto TT soarer, completly stock apart from a hks panel filter, the soarer normally wins against stockish 33's by 1-2 car length by about ~180 (so pretty close), the i found the laggy in comparison to a 33 (ive driven both, thou the 33 was pretty modded), it's lag lag lag then suddenly boost (and sideways lol)

and redline2003, trust me, they r quicker than flat 15's stock lol

with up'd boost, exhaust, intake u should beat one no prob thou, stock, ud want to get a good launch, and hope his car was running shitty lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It was roughly 3.5 hours.    car went in around 11:00 and I was done around 2:30 He did the initial runs, install the BC and then Nistune install and tune.  The best part was sitting in the lobby and hearing the skyline on full throttle at the dyno 😂😂
    • Glad it all went smooth. How long did the tuning process take?
    • Yeah that was kind of the same feedback my tuner gave me.  the boost tee is until I can sort out my plan for the electronic boost controller and what I’d get, where I’d mount the dash etc.  I’m happy with this until I can figure it out. Not a big fan of the A-pillar gauges. I’d like to get a clean install of the boost gauge - something digital like GFB.  Something like that might fit neatly where the ashtray is and look clean. I feel like replacing the OEM triple gauge is a bit extreme for a weekender like my skyline. And it’s not making crazy power to need all the additional sensors/gauges. 
    • I'm about to swap my box to Tremec T56 Magnum F & initially thinking of re-using my DCS twin plate (can get it re centred for the bigger spline) but it's been called out the box will be noisy (rattle) as the clutch is unsprung.  So I'm doing as much research as possible. I'm not so worried about holding the power as I'll go the track version which on paper will hold the maybe 1000hp I make. It's the longevity I worry about. DCS told me they don't use a sprung centre as it's just something that can break. The uni clutch has a very complicated sprung centre. Any one had or heard about any issues with it failing? Thanks in advance.
    • Auto is at least 10% (from my real, actual experience with different torque converters and manual on the same setup) ~185rwkw at 11.6psi (peak!) is entirely what one would expect without a FMIC or anything else on the intake, it does bleed off towards the higher RPM so it's what, 9psi there? Note: There is nothing that can be done about this with a manual boost tee. If you want to hold it steady and gain more top end, well - You will need electronic boost control.....
×
×
  • Create New...