Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey just got a high mount manifold and got 700cc injectors and

power fc and full 3in just trying to work out what turbo i should use

have been thinking of a gt30r with .63 rear housing but wat are ur appinions.

i dont want it to be to laggy but still want it to hi boost hard

sorta a street car and drift pig i'm going for

just let me know what u all think

thanks blocka

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232287-rb20det-what-turbo-should-i-use/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well laggy +GT30 frame + RB20 = laggy no matter what you do mate. Thats how it is.

If you want it to hit boost hard, i suggest a older T3 bush bearing hi-flow. probably the best turbo to be....

It goes like this... nothing... nothing... nothing... HIT HARD BOOST VTEC yO!

However, if you want a decent setup that is responsive, makes the RB20 look like a reasonable motor etc

HKS 2530 is the winner of the battle, 220rwkw with as much of a 'broad' range as you'll get. Anything bigger and your not going to see anything before 4000rpm

Thats just my thoughts anyhow. Im a response setup person

  blockasR32 said:
hey just got a high mount manifold and got 700cc injectors and

power fc and full 3in just trying to work out what turbo i should use

have been thinking of a gt30r with .63 rear housing but wat are ur appinions.

i dont want it to be to laggy but still want it to hi boost hard

sorta a street car and drift pig i'm going for

just let me know what u all think

thanks blocka

+1 on the HKS 2530 setup.

If you want something a little different and you are willing to adapt, anything like a 2860RS, 2871R etc will do. Just need to adapt to the manifold and dump etc. Same as if you were going for the 30R.

With the right head setup, a 30R with a .6 rear will see 1 bar before 4500. There are a few better options for better response in that range though. External gated 3076R or 3071R, these are more responsive than the 30R due to the smaller turbine wheel but still retain a good sized compressor for overall hp.

  R31Nismoid said:
lol

whats funny?

do you think the calibration on a dyno will always be accurate?

on my tacho on the street it was showing me i was making full boost just befor 4k, dyno showed it to be just after 4200 and the rev limit went to 7800 where the ecu was set to 7200.

3071 or 3076 with .63 rear externally gated sounds pretty good or wat about a 3037 with a .63 or .7 rear and a .6 front

i know that with the rb20 i wont get to much so i will eventually do a 25/30 combo but that wont happen for about a year

so how much would i be looking at and where can i get one

Edited by blockasR32
  Wheezy said:
I had a GT30 0.63 sitting there for my 20.

Sold it and purchased a Trust TD06L2.

The guy who purchased the GT30 put it on a 20, made 240rwkw on 20psi.

I make 277rwkw on 18psi with heaps left in the thing.

that doesn't sound right for a GT3076R.

you must've had the smaller version GT3071R (with smaller/cropped turbine wheel) or the tune was bad.

  RS500 said:
that doesn't sound right for a GT3076R.

you must've had the smaller version GT3071R (with smaller/cropped turbine wheel) or the tune was bad.

It was not a 3076 or 71, it was the 3082, and I never used it.

The guy who bought it reckons his ecu he was using could not handle it......(strange for an aftermarket ecu :D, you are correct that something was holding it back however; my finger points at tune)

there are only two opitions in my mind for a rb20

1. 2530 GTRS

2. TD06LS

both excellent response with great power

if u want to do 25/30 save your money and do it properly stick with the stock turbo till u build it

  RipNGrip said:
there are only two opitions in my mind for a rb20

1. 2530 GTRS

2. TD06LS

both excellent response with great power

if u want to do 25/30 save your money and do it properly stick with the stock turbo till u build it

go the HKS 2530 i got a t04 on mine and is laggy as all hell

  Wheezy said:
I had a GT30 0.63 sitting there for my 20.

Sold it and purchased a Trust TD06L2.

The guy who purchased the GT30 put it on a 20, made 240rwkw on 20psi.

I make 277rwkw on 18psi with heaps left in the thing.

L2 is gods gift to RB20... end of story.

  RipNGrip said:
there are only two opitions in my mind for a rb20

1. 2530 GTRS

2. TD06LS

both excellent response with great power

if u want to do 25/30 save your money and do it properly stick with the stock turbo till u build it

Just so people dont get carried away with expectation....there is nothing excellent about the response of a TD06 or GT-RS on an RB20. The 2530 is marginally better through the lower rpm range but loses out big time up top.

So, I agree with the saving money for the 25/30, if you are not going to be happy with puinchy 200rwkws or laggier 250rwks odd and will end up going 30...then just save your coin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even with the piston at TDC there was room for it to drop, but I don't think it can drop fully into the cylinder, the problem you have is that you need something pushing against the valve to hold it up so you have enough room to put the new stem seal on and the spring etc.  I used compressed air only because putting rope in the cylinder seemed a bit risky to me, I know people have done it countless times before like this. Overall it's a pain in the ass job. Honestly you'd probably be better off taking the head off because the risk of dropping something in the engine and the finicky-ness of it all is very stressful. If you are going to attempt it though i 10000% recommend a 36050 valve spring/keeper tool. I had both the traditional lever type and after doing 1 cylinder it was absolute pain to get those valve keepers in place, even with 2 people. That 36050 is amazing, you do have to push hard to get them in place but it works perfectly almost every time. Back to my actual issue I think my engine is just tired and old and the rings have gone bad. The comp numbers (cold, no oil) were: Cyl 1 -129psi Cyl 2 - 133psi Cyl 3 - 138psi Cyl 4 - 137psi Cyl 5 - 157psi Cyl 6 - 142psi   Cylinder 5 and 6 having the most carbon on them.
    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
×
×
  • Create New...