Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Are we talking with the 8.0cm2 Exhaust Housing or the 6.0cm2?

as we were comparing the GT2530 i was talking 6cm (dont expect over 220-240rwkw though) (i probably should have made that clear ROY, sorry)

Wheezys is killer (my favorite RB20 setup to date) but is a 8cm and is my weapon of choice with a 4.3 diff ratio it literally laughed out at 270rwkw run :rolleyes: i reckon with some serious head work it would crack 300rwkw easy.. (not the kind of setup that comes close to the GT2530 for comparison)

In this comparo though i reckon the 6cm would be a wild ride, with any ratio. same response as the 2530 and a much steeper / broader power and torque curve.

It would need to be special order, ive done a few 6cm on SR's and CA's and they punch so hard. Dont get me wrong though the GT2530 is a good turbo and is impossible to beat for VALUE but seat of the pants L2 is GOD.

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I looked at the 6cm when i changed from 10cm to 8cm. The 6cm is bloody small. I think the 6cm is definitely 1.5L territory and for use on twin turbo 6 cylinder setups. I was tempted to try one until i physically held one in my hand. Tiny is the word i think i used.

I looked at the 6cm when i changed from 10cm to 8cm. The 6cm is bloody small. I think the 6cm is definitely 1.5L territory and for use on twin turbo 6 cylinder setups. I was tempted to try one until i physically held one in my hand. Tiny is the word i think i used.

yeah they are small but like the 8cm they just seem to be able to stretch further than they should (on theSR20's anyway), i had a pair put aside for our next RB26 project (superlap) but i think i will swap the #7 housing on the k5 to the #9 and see what it goes like... if im not happy then expect twin L2's 6cm strapped to the side :D

I reckon some form of 2530/GT2860RS/GT2871R (in 48T only) on HKS's T3 flanged GT28 IW turbine housing is probably the place to be for a reasonable useful power range .

That last one ie the GT2871R in 48T is basically a GTRS but with a 48T vs 52T compressor wheel . It would give a few more Lbs of air than a 2530 or 2860RS so possibly another 30 odd horses power potential .

A .

well i am very happy with the response this thread is getting......

i am liking the sound of this TD06LS with a 8cm rear housing and a 52t now how much and where do i get one

are they internally gated or external

well i am very happy with the response this thread is getting......

+1. Although I'm more inclined towards the 6cm rear housing, just after a responsive 200rwkw.

But I'm also interested to know what is included in the 8cm turbo kit? i.e. manifold, ext gate etc?

Personally, its overkill to use the TD06 with the 6cm housing and choke it up for only 200rwkws. Far better to get a bolt on TD05-18G, be a much nicer option with better transient response etc. But then you are talking an eqiv turbo to a 2530 etc so why put up with a oil cooled plain bearing turbo if you can get a water cooled, ball bearing turbo that has been proven to work well on a 2L...ie 2530?!?!?!

The GT-RS is an option and has shown that they have some potential for 250rwkws on an RB20, best of all they are almost bolt on internal gate. So far more convenient then a full TD06 setup

so if some one can help me out on where to get this trust td06sl2 set up from that would be great

see i will buy this turbo and will build my other engine in the mean while

it would be good to get a great price for this

yeah i would go the trust TD06 cause they make fairly big power and are not laggy on a rb20 which is good cause going anything bigger on a rb20 is crap for pick up, i went to big on mine and it was crap, power figure was good but just real laggy

as i said before i was keen on the TD06SL2 20g 8cm rear not the 6cm rear so that it dosent 'chock it up' and should still be good for around 240rwkw

i would expect minimum 250rwkw.

thanks alot guys

is there any other places that i can get it they seem pretty good for price

sold a fair few, out of stock ATM but expect $4200-4300, alot of coin but it is a killer kit. If your after a simple bolt on you can save alot of coin....

yeah i was expexting bout that price and that covers the whole kit and kaboodal right

i was looking for the turbo and all i could find was the triangle flange type

so u sell the kits do u........... are they straight bolt on

i'll send pm if so

In the early 3,000rpm it start to ramp onto boost. Depending on the tune, the mods, the gear you are in etc, expect 18psi by 4,500rpm at the absolute worst. More like about 4,200rpm i think

Here is a plot of my turbo and a GT-RS on very similar RB20s.

med_gallery_462_50_171164.jpg

The revs may be a little bit out depending on tyre diam, but its looks about right, if not a bit optimistic

No time ATM but that TD06SL2 turbine is bit of a special and supposed to be a Trust spec item , the Evo crowd really like them in reverse rotation twin scroll form - with the "Right" compressor .

Will get back later but there are some interesting possibilities with the larger TD04 turbines - TD04HL and TE04H , and some of the I think Volvo or Saabs had a 7cm housing and a sort of T3 style flange .

Later , A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...