Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, i've really developed an interest in tuning power fc's and want to get FC Datalogit to actually do it on mine.

On they're website they advertise the software and the cable for $400ish i think, on this smaller tuning site ausperformace they advertise it for $650 but with some LC1 cable.

A few people have told me the cable itself is 600-700... I'm confused.

So i need to get the software to do it with, the cable to connect it to my laptop and how important is a wideband o2 sensor?

Thanks alot

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232322-fc-datalogit-tuning/
Share on other sites

datalogit = $500 ish

wideband sensor = $500 for a wire in kit, upto $1k for a portable wideband kit

the wideband is an absolute must for on road and dyno tuning

without it all you can is increase timing and wait for it detonate

there is lots of documentation on PFC tuning and datalogit tuning

the PFC FAQ covers these items to death, the link is in my signature

Ok, i've really developed an interest in tuning power fc's and want to get FC Datalogit to actually do it on mine.

On they're website they advertise the software and the cable for $400ish i think, on this smaller tuning site ausperformace they advertise it for $650 but with some LC1 cable.

A few people have told me the cable itself is 600-700... I'm confused.

So i need to get the software to do it with, the cable to connect it to my laptop and how important is a wideband o2 sensor?

Thanks alot

The LC1 kit (around $2-300) consists of a wideband O2 sensor (which can be fitted in place of your standard one) and a cable which can connect to your laptop (or to an LM1 or LM2 datalogger). Check the www.innovatemotorsports.com site. There is an Australian made kit from Tech Edge (do a search on this site for SK's account of building and using one).

consists of a wideband O2 sensor (which can be fitted in place of your standard one)

i disagree with that, the sensor needs to be about 3 feet away from the turbine outlet according to my wb02 manual.

thats where i fitted mine, also the angle & location around the pipe is important for sensor life.

cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...