Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi i am on a mission to break the 300hp mark with standard turbo

has it been done before?

i hear that some of you have 290hp but haven’t herd for 300hp

please leave any thoughts and or comments

and yes i have searched for hours

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232494-300hp-stock-turbo-can-it-be-done/
Share on other sites

If you have the money to replace the turbo, yes it can be done. The question is how long will it last? One dyno run, a few, a week, a month, a year, who knows?

I have heard of people running 16psi on std turbo, expecting it to blow, as they were ready to upgrade, then it lasted for years and made about 300hp.

It can be done.

Go to the dyno operator, tell him you wanna see 300rwhp.

He can play with some settings and *ta-da* you have 300rwhp.

Can you do it legitimately?

No. 290 is wrong also. Add to the fact you'd NEVER tell the different between 10rwhp anyway.

Stock turbo is good for a legitimate 190-200rwkw 12psi or so (260-270rwhp).

No one has ever run 110mph to backup the 220rwkw/300rwhp on a stock turbo to my knowldge anyway.

EDIT: Obviously with no2 and so on that changes the ball game, so does race fuel.

Hey mate.

I did make 220rwkw and it was still going over a year later. As nismoid has raised, I never did run it at the track but the 220 was very real. IE no tuner influence or funny air temps. It can be done, but just be aware that u are pushing the limit of turbo reliability.

good luck,

glenn

i have a dyno graph but it wont let me upload.........

Edited by 202.3rwkw

Ash 12psi is the "safer" boost limit for a std turbo, but it doesn't mean that some std turbo's aren't able to run higher boost without exploding. It's a game of Russian roulette, as some turbos just come out stronger than others during manufacturing.

At 12psi i have seen these turbos make anywhere between 180-210rwkw. Push the turbo harder and you may make 220rwkw/300rwhp, but it fast runs out of it's efficiency range, hence why 4psi extra may only make an extra 10-15rwkw.

I know of someone who was making 220rwkw with the stock turbo, it ended up spinning apart and bits of metal went through the intercooler and into the engine, now he has to get a rebuild.

Make sure you get the turbo high-flowed. The ceramic parts are just to weak.

I know of someone who was making 220rwkw with the stock turbo, it ended up spinning apart and bits of metal went through the intercooler and into the engine, now he has to get a rebuild.

Make sure you get the turbo high-flowed. The ceramic parts are just to weak.

How did it get in the engine?? The ceramic wheel is in exhaust side of the turbo. Hence you would find the broken parts in the cat.

How did it get in the engine?? The ceramic wheel is in exhaust side of the turbo. Hence you would find the broken parts in the cat.

I'm not exactly sure how it would work, but when his turbo blew bits of it got sucked though and into the engine.

Guessing(using my head too..!) here, ....

.....but as the turbine disintegrates, this will cause a sudden huge loss of forced air volume on the compressor side toward the inlet, the engine will pull anything in(as avacuum state exists in cylinder/s), .. from ANY side, inlet or exhaust, and given there is valve overlap, and late closing exhuast valves in the equation, this would leave the door to take in 'nasty bits', wide open.

It has got to be something like this i guess. I have yet to have it logically explained, ...so this is my 'stab' at it.

TBH.. just a small amount in the cylinder/s will make things get expensive too.

I suppose logically it should spit it out the 'zorst, but historically this is not the case.

You hear the tales about it, and the result products,.. but yeeeeap, someone correct me if am wrong... enlighten me..!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
    • Any damage to the box/input shaft?
    • Hey there Mate , I just got my local guy to install it Waterhouse Performance, Penrith (specialise Nissan/Datsun and other performance cars) , you can do it yourself if you like , AMS has instructions on their website.  Cheers Pac
×
×
  • Create New...