Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I currently have an R33 RB25DET running poncams, GT3540, and supporting mods.

I was recently told that if i were to swap out my 3540r .82 for a 3076r .63 i would still make around 400rwhp with more response and less lag. This was appealing to me as i have just began taking it out on the track and can always do with a tad more response.

Please help out a novice racer by confirming or rebutting this opinion.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232645-3540-v-3076/
Share on other sites

If your still running the stock manifold there is absolutely ZERO to gain by going the GT3540. On the same dyno my own car and a mates basically identical apart from one having the gt35 the other the gt30. Both made near identical power on the same boost.

I've since dropped cams in which has pushed power up to 302rwkw on 17psi with the GT3076r .82 IW.

The .63 I doubt on 98ron pump fuel will push 400rwhp 'easily'. You really need the .82. regardless it will still be a lot more responsive than the gt35 .82. Especially in the lower gears and corner exit etc.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232645-3540-v-3076/#findComment-4082220
Share on other sites

th 0.82 housing works pretty well on RB25's with progressive delivery from what i have seen.

the 0.63 may provide a more light switch power delivery but will probably run out of puff with a 500hp compressor bolted to it.

i was just agreeing with cubes hence the short post.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232645-3540-v-3076/#findComment-4082374
Share on other sites

its far more balanced and suited to the 25, so yeah.

My 600hp GT30 was quite nice with delivery (.82) all things considered on my 25 back in the day and the 3076 would be more linear again being the smaller comp wheel etc :P Will buzz up nicely is my prediction

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/232645-3540-v-3076/#findComment-4082657
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And at over $2 per litre I'm starting to consider setting up a corn mash still and converting over to alcohol and running mine on it !  Up side of that is it all doesn't have to go into the car ! Win win !
    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
×
×
  • Create New...