Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not too sure Joel, HKS dont have cores, they are a standard garret item - HKS only have proprietry on the comp and turb cover and compressor wheel.

I think it would be more likely to have something to do with turbine AR and comp wheel trim - bigger turbine AR will flow more, but will take longer to build boost, bigger comp wheel will flow more, but if too big could (in theory) result in a miss match to the turbine and result in surge. Always a trade somewhere.

The reason I said it was because he originally said he had a 0.68. I would like to know the exact spec differences to give a better idea of the comparison between the two. Without knowing all the specs, it would be useless comparing;)

At the end of the day, the only true way to compare would be on the same car, cos lots of things can make a difference. I noticed a considerable loss of power when I swapped my N1 exhaust for a nismo dual muffler one.

My big problem at the moment is that I want to try a bigger turbine AR, as I feel the 0.61 is maybe causing a bit too much back pressure. It is interesting that the HKS 3037 kit for RB25 uses a 0.87 AR. Might be worth giving it a try, but at well over $500-$750 a pop for the housing, I am not going to rush out and buy the full range to see the difference:D

Steve: I now have a .81 A/R Ex Housing and noticed a large difference in detenation(spelling?) levels. In my early stage I had the same tuning, same turbo specs apart from the bigger A/R ex housing and my detenation levels reduced by 1/3. I have put this down to less back pressure, less heat , and less cylinder back filling on cam overlap. Obviously my turd is no were near standard now.

The spool up difference from .6 to .8 A/R was hardly noticable. Smoother maybe.

Great results GTS-t VSPEC!! Wow, it really seems that the GT30 turbos are responding well on the RB25s. 270kW@wheels on 13psi is a $#!T load!! :) Sure you'll be having traction problems. The only problem I see with comparing dyno figures is that they can vary from dyno to dyno. Also depends on the air temperature of the day. For example, the JUN s15 equipped with T88 (in Perth I think) produced something like 700rwhp on one dyno, only to get 550rwhp on another dyno. Something like that anyway, I read it in a Fast Fours mag. Anyway, point being that there is a difference between all dynos. To compare two cars you really need to dyno both on the same dyno on the same day. In the end, it's really how fast you run the 1/4 mile which is going to judge how quick your car is. Still, very impressive figures to both! ;)

I think most companies use the Dyno Dynamics dyno (?). Very nice results, will be interesting to see how the turbo fares as the boost is increased. It does seem to produce more power than Steve's HKS one, but it also seems to have more turbo lag. Maybe there is a noticeable difference between the Garrett and HKS turbos afterall?

Once you guys start increasing the boost, then we should be able to see what happens. I've heard that HKS turbos are more efficient at a higher boost level (eg 1.5bar), and that they spool up faster. I've heard that Garrett turbos are more efficient at lower boost (eg 1.0bar). Guess time will tell...keep up the good work!!!

Steve: Do you know what are the differences between an HKS turbo and a Garrett turbo? I heard that the cores and turbine trims are the same. The only difference are the compressor housings and compressor trims. Are the exhaust housings also different? Or is it in size where they are different? Example: I know the GT3037S can have a 0.73A/R exhaust housing, and I don't think the Garrett GT30 has the same size?

The reason I ask is because I have a broken GT3037S turbo. It has a damaged turbine wheel and I am going to try get someone to repair it - either GCG or Garrett in Sydney. If the turbine wheel is replaced with a Garrett turbine wheel, could my repaired turbo still be classified as an HKS one? Meaning that the turbine wheels are the same for both Garrett and HKS GT30 cored turbos?

Originally posted by BOOSTD

Steve: I now have a .81 A/R Ex Housing and noticed a large difference in detenation(spelling?) levels. In my early stage I had the same tuning, same turbo specs apart from the bigger A/R ex housing and my detenation levels reduced by 1/3. I have put this down to less back pressure, less heat , and less cylinder back filling on cam overlap. Obviously my turd is no were near standard now.

The spool up difference from .6 to .8 A/R was hardly noticable. Smoother maybe.

Thats the thing I am thinking, back pressure with a turbo is the big killer, and I am a bit worried with larger cams, therefore more overlap, things could get worse rather than better.

But if you reckon there is bugger all difference in spoolup time between 0.6 and 0.8, I think I might have to speed up the swap.

Smoother onto boost would be good, cos at the moment its bloody violent. I tried upping the boost to 1.2bar on the previous tune and holey fark, 120kmh - 4th gear and only 1/4 to1/3 throttle and the bloody thing got severly bent out of shape, thank god no cars were beside me.

RS500, if it were a 0.73, or maybe a 0.87 ( but I think I would have to give it a spin first) I would be tempted.

But 1.01, now why would you be trying to off load that??????

EVOIV, as far as I know HKS have proprietry on the housings and the comp wheel, which is why no one can buy them except HKS.

As far as I know, exhaust wheel and cartridge can be purchased direct from garret, or be ordered in by your local turbo shop.

Anybody out there got a 0.73 or 0.87 3037 turbine housing they want to off load:D

Steve: As you know, I have a GT3037S in bits at the moment. Compressor and Turbine housing, and core. The exhaust housing is a 0.73A/R. I am still not sure what I am going to do with this turbo. I do want to get it repaired eventually, if I can get my lazy ass into gear :P Also, not sure if it can be fixed - it will have to go to GCG or Garrett first for an inspection. But hopefully it can be as I think the turbine wheel is the only damaged part. If it does get fixed, I may opt to put on a larger turbine housing (sourced from where I don't know?). So then the 0.73A/R might be up for grabs. Maybe I should buy the 1.01A/R of RS500? :)

i might be lining up a buy off a friend for a GT3037 with a 1.01 exhaust housing, so if i get it, i'll swap ya no probs

yeah, if this works out and i sell my current turbo, i'm ready to move into the ball-bearing world :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • @soviet_merlin Thanks mate!  Nothing too major but will hold me up for a while. I've got lymphomas to get taken off the back of my neck and the middle of my spine which always conjures scary thoughts!  It sounds worse than it is. Yeah great, conjuring more rabbit hole deepening , just what I need! 🤣  
    • I'd argue the F50 kit I got is very good value. For ~2k I got the calipers (refurbed condition), adapters, pads, brake lines, rotors, and top hats. I think you'd be pretty hard to get Evo/GTR/350z brembos + the additional hardware for similar money. Used market for a pair of front calipers alone I've seen tend to run anywhere from $1500-2000 depending on condition.    That said, something like a GTR or 350z brembo is a lot easier to adapt to the Silvia. 
    • Is there a significant price difference between the Evo/gtr/350z brembos vs the F50? Looks amazing.
    • I was actually being a tightarse at the time LOL... My OCD is tickling me into running a 2nd 8AN Teflon hose all the way down and removing the 2x OEM hardlines. My other side of my brain is telling me to run 2x hardlines front to back (also acts as a fuel cooler, so win win).
    • As I mentioned in an earlier post, I had some trouble with the Silvia's brakes dragging back in 2023. I managed to sort it out then, but the same problem came back to bite me late last year. Just take a look at the picture – I had a feeling the handbrake was acting up again, and I was right. Anyway, I'd been wanting to upgrade to bigger brakes for a while. Not that the Silvia's brakes were bad, but it was more of a "want" than a "need", you know? It was funny, though – at the time, I couldn't find any Evo Brembos, 350Z Brembos, or GTR Brembos for a decent price (of course, tons of them popped up online after I already bought my kit!). I ended up going with an F50 Brembo kit, which came with adapters, brake lines, 330mm rotors, and top hats. The F50 Brembo caliper was used in a few other cars too, like the FPV. I also decided this was the perfect opportunity to ditch the Silvia's ridiculous rear brakes and that awful handbrake (some of you were definitely right about that!). I picked up some R33 calipers and all the necessary bits – rear drums, backing plates, and new hardware to refurbish the calipers. Of course, it wouldn't be a project without a few hiccups. Turns out the brake master cylinder was playing up and basically (to put it simply) keeping the brakes engaged. I had it overhauled, and after some adjustments, everything was working again. The whole process took a while, as you can imagine. To top it off, the front right wheel bearings were shot and needed replacing too. This is a rare occasion where I'm posting an update while it's all still fresh! These pictures were taken just this afternoon.
×
×
  • Create New...