Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not being technical at all here.

but i just took my friends 300zxtt for a spin, he just fitted a lightweight underdrive pulley kit.. the main pulley is 800g compared to the original 8kg.. and it DEFINETLY accelerated heaps harder.. reved faster. made the whole car feel lighter, as if the engine had less of a job to do.

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm funny. I gave GFB a call about their crank pulleys and belt sizes the other day concerning my SR20. Anyways, after that I asked them why they dont make pulleys for the RB. They plainly stated that it ruins the bearings and that they 'learned the hard way'.

Food for thought...

Give them a call i guess. I remember a few days ago i was reading about a H22A honda using a pulley, and after 40,000ks, a teardown was performed. It was found that the main bearing #1 was completely hammered compared to main bearing #5. I'll try and dig it up.

Also alot of WRXs seem to have trouble with pulleys, as it causes the CAS to go whacked at 6000rpm. Sounds like nasty vibrations are responsible, and this is on a short crank EJ20.. Tonnes more info on NASIOC.

This is the email Reply I got from Brett turner at Go Fast Bits:

Hi Ryan,

We don't do a pulley for the RB series engine, because they rely on the harmonic balancer. Without it, the oil pump will fail and therefore the engine will shortly after if it is not stopped in time, which is unfortunate because there would be a significant gain to be had by removing the extremely heavy factory pulley.

Regards,

Brett Turner

Engineer/Technical Sales

Go Fast Bits

+612 9569 7648

www.gofastbits.com.au

Perhaps if they were to satisfy us with underdriven/lightened pulleys and forgo the balancer we would be happy?

Thanks for the great discussion guys. Heaps more interesting than the weapons engineering I'm stuck with now.

Hi guys, we have been running lightweight pulleys on race engines for years (not RB's, yet) without any signs of these bearing issues. Since they have all been very tightly balanced, maybe this is why we have no problems.

This of course doesn't not fix any harmonic problems, but I can't see how that would be an issue with RB20/25/26 's. But RB30's, because of their longer stroke, may be an issue.

I am about to test a set of lightweight pulley's on an RB31DET on the engine dyno in the next few weeks, so that will be interesting to see if there are any vibrations. They show up readily on the engine dyno as it has sensors mounted in the bed.

Interesting thread...........

hmm... torsional vibration and whatever else aside.. if people are really keen on reducing the rotational mass.. wouldn't a more simple solution to cut a few items out of the equation?

Wouldn't simply just removing the belt to the aircon compressor (and you may as well remove the compressor at the same time to save that 10kg or so), removing the engine fan, replacing that with a thermo fan, and putting in an electric water pump (craig davies, etc) give you similar results in terms of reduced rotational mass? Ok, maybe its not as simple, but same end results(??)

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/08...ump/index.shtml - is an interesting article..

p.s. has anybody run a craig davies pump in their RB? What were the results like? Its about $600 for the kit.

predator, I dont think ppl wanna forgo AC. And besides, you loose almost no power to the compressor anyway when its not operating! And the fan is viscous coupling, so you'd only loose coupla hp you wouldnt feel at best (unless its fully locked due to being fooked or ur engine is running hot)

Also ~80% of the gain from a pulley is actually removing the weight from it, and the rest is from underdriving the accessories!

I'd agree that off the aircon off is barely making a difference.. my physics isn't great but wouldn't *any* friction on the pulley caused by the belt would cause some loss? Even if is not actively spinning?? But anyhow, the aircon wasn't the main factor, as like above, you'd get the same effect just by turning it off (simple)

However the fan would have to place some noticeable placing draw?? and like wise the waterpump must be placing draw?? as again (physics knowledge not great) isn't any device running off that pulley system effectively creating an increase in rotational mass?? it works as "one" system, rather than simply a weight of an individual component??

as you can see with the question marks I have absolutely no idea, but I'm just keen to find out why/why not :-)

Hi predator, I have already completely removed the A/C and the viscous fan has been replaced with an electric one. Based on other results I have seen, an electric water pump is not on my list. I have also replaced the standard flywheel and clutch with an OS Giken twin plate. So pulleys are next on the list of rotating things to lighten.

You are right Predator, the water pump does draw power from the engine... but if we could get our hand on a light weight crankshaft pulley, it would be easier, and less expensive.

Out of interest, Issue 40 of "High Performance Imports" (GTR Special No. 4) - has an add on page 11 for a super light weight crankshaft pulley for the RB26DETT, by Power Enterprise. I wonder if they make one for the RB25DET?

Trust/Greddy makes a set of pulleys, all *bar* the the main crank (I assume for the risk/perceived risk of the balancing issues discussed).. Favourites nengun have them for approximately $300: http://www.nengun.com/product_info.php?cPa...4694af6628dcbea

Pulley.jpg

I guess the main one everybody has been talking about is the main crank pulley, however I feeling trust would have invested a bit to see whether it was safe enough to reliably put on a stock balanced RB engine and the answer was no. For fitment, I assume they are same across RB25 and RB26, seeing as everything around this "area" is pretty much transferable (water pump, timing belt, ex. and inlet cam gears, even the cam cover)

Hi Sydneykid,

Curious to hear about the results of your rotating mass reduction experiments. Have you produced any sort of measurable results thus far? I guess in racing it all matters, but I was just wondering if you have been able to deduce how much power was being sapped by the heavy pulleys experimentally? Also, I dont understand how the state of engine balance, i.e. dynamic balance of the crank, and static balance of rods/pistons etc, has anything to do with the harmonic balancer. I was under the impression that its task was to reduce torsional oscillations, not moments produced by dynamic imbalances which lead to crank bending perpendicular to its axis. Do you think you'll get an accurate representation of torsional effect without the use of an encoder device on the crank snout? Interesting...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...