Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not being technical at all here.

but i just took my friends 300zxtt for a spin, he just fitted a lightweight underdrive pulley kit.. the main pulley is 800g compared to the original 8kg.. and it DEFINETLY accelerated heaps harder.. reved faster. made the whole car feel lighter, as if the engine had less of a job to do.

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hmmm funny. I gave GFB a call about their crank pulleys and belt sizes the other day concerning my SR20. Anyways, after that I asked them why they dont make pulleys for the RB. They plainly stated that it ruins the bearings and that they 'learned the hard way'.

Food for thought...

Give them a call i guess. I remember a few days ago i was reading about a H22A honda using a pulley, and after 40,000ks, a teardown was performed. It was found that the main bearing #1 was completely hammered compared to main bearing #5. I'll try and dig it up.

Also alot of WRXs seem to have trouble with pulleys, as it causes the CAS to go whacked at 6000rpm. Sounds like nasty vibrations are responsible, and this is on a short crank EJ20.. Tonnes more info on NASIOC.

This is the email Reply I got from Brett turner at Go Fast Bits:

Hi Ryan,

We don't do a pulley for the RB series engine, because they rely on the harmonic balancer. Without it, the oil pump will fail and therefore the engine will shortly after if it is not stopped in time, which is unfortunate because there would be a significant gain to be had by removing the extremely heavy factory pulley.

Regards,

Brett Turner

Engineer/Technical Sales

Go Fast Bits

+612 9569 7648

www.gofastbits.com.au

Perhaps if they were to satisfy us with underdriven/lightened pulleys and forgo the balancer we would be happy?

Thanks for the great discussion guys. Heaps more interesting than the weapons engineering I'm stuck with now.

Hi guys, we have been running lightweight pulleys on race engines for years (not RB's, yet) without any signs of these bearing issues. Since they have all been very tightly balanced, maybe this is why we have no problems.

This of course doesn't not fix any harmonic problems, but I can't see how that would be an issue with RB20/25/26 's. But RB30's, because of their longer stroke, may be an issue.

I am about to test a set of lightweight pulley's on an RB31DET on the engine dyno in the next few weeks, so that will be interesting to see if there are any vibrations. They show up readily on the engine dyno as it has sensors mounted in the bed.

Interesting thread...........

hmm... torsional vibration and whatever else aside.. if people are really keen on reducing the rotational mass.. wouldn't a more simple solution to cut a few items out of the equation?

Wouldn't simply just removing the belt to the aircon compressor (and you may as well remove the compressor at the same time to save that 10kg or so), removing the engine fan, replacing that with a thermo fan, and putting in an electric water pump (craig davies, etc) give you similar results in terms of reduced rotational mass? Ok, maybe its not as simple, but same end results(??)

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2000/08...ump/index.shtml - is an interesting article..

p.s. has anybody run a craig davies pump in their RB? What were the results like? Its about $600 for the kit.

predator, I dont think ppl wanna forgo AC. And besides, you loose almost no power to the compressor anyway when its not operating! And the fan is viscous coupling, so you'd only loose coupla hp you wouldnt feel at best (unless its fully locked due to being fooked or ur engine is running hot)

Also ~80% of the gain from a pulley is actually removing the weight from it, and the rest is from underdriving the accessories!

I'd agree that off the aircon off is barely making a difference.. my physics isn't great but wouldn't *any* friction on the pulley caused by the belt would cause some loss? Even if is not actively spinning?? But anyhow, the aircon wasn't the main factor, as like above, you'd get the same effect just by turning it off (simple)

However the fan would have to place some noticeable placing draw?? and like wise the waterpump must be placing draw?? as again (physics knowledge not great) isn't any device running off that pulley system effectively creating an increase in rotational mass?? it works as "one" system, rather than simply a weight of an individual component??

as you can see with the question marks I have absolutely no idea, but I'm just keen to find out why/why not :-)

Hi predator, I have already completely removed the A/C and the viscous fan has been replaced with an electric one. Based on other results I have seen, an electric water pump is not on my list. I have also replaced the standard flywheel and clutch with an OS Giken twin plate. So pulleys are next on the list of rotating things to lighten.

You are right Predator, the water pump does draw power from the engine... but if we could get our hand on a light weight crankshaft pulley, it would be easier, and less expensive.

Out of interest, Issue 40 of "High Performance Imports" (GTR Special No. 4) - has an add on page 11 for a super light weight crankshaft pulley for the RB26DETT, by Power Enterprise. I wonder if they make one for the RB25DET?

Trust/Greddy makes a set of pulleys, all *bar* the the main crank (I assume for the risk/perceived risk of the balancing issues discussed).. Favourites nengun have them for approximately $300: http://www.nengun.com/product_info.php?cPa...4694af6628dcbea

Pulley.jpg

I guess the main one everybody has been talking about is the main crank pulley, however I feeling trust would have invested a bit to see whether it was safe enough to reliably put on a stock balanced RB engine and the answer was no. For fitment, I assume they are same across RB25 and RB26, seeing as everything around this "area" is pretty much transferable (water pump, timing belt, ex. and inlet cam gears, even the cam cover)

Hi Sydneykid,

Curious to hear about the results of your rotating mass reduction experiments. Have you produced any sort of measurable results thus far? I guess in racing it all matters, but I was just wondering if you have been able to deduce how much power was being sapped by the heavy pulleys experimentally? Also, I dont understand how the state of engine balance, i.e. dynamic balance of the crank, and static balance of rods/pistons etc, has anything to do with the harmonic balancer. I was under the impression that its task was to reduce torsional oscillations, not moments produced by dynamic imbalances which lead to crank bending perpendicular to its axis. Do you think you'll get an accurate representation of torsional effect without the use of an encoder device on the crank snout? Interesting...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can perhaps see how the R33 appreciators would think so.  
    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...