Jump to content
SAU Community

Gt3582r 1.06 Turbine Housing Internally Gated

chris davey
 Share

Recommended Posts

chris davey Enthusiast

chris davey

Posted
Posted

Item: gt3582r 1.06 turbine housing internally gated, .70 comp cover ie. not an xr6t version.

Location: sunshine coast

Website:

Item Condition: used for a few thousand km's. very good, no shaft play.

Reason for Selling: don't really need the flow of a 400rwkw turbo for a street car :P

Price and Payment Conditions: Mainly looking for swaps. I am after a gt3076R turbo, internally gated with .82 rear housing or gt3582r internally gated with .63 rear housing. May also consider straight swap for another internally gated .63 gt35 turbine housing for just the 1.06 turbine housing currently on it. Don't want an externally gated version.

Extra Info:

Pictures: nope, still on car. looks like every other gt35 :no:

Contact Details: here or [email protected]

chris davey Enthusiast

chris davey

Posted
  • Author
Posted

it is on a 1jz cresssida. previous owner (my mate) bought it new. he sold the car to me unfinished basically ie. it got 250kms to a 60L tank so it was rarely driven. I have done about 500kms on it (I have a daily). Power made is not anywhere near potential as it was blowing the spark out so had to stop at 5400rpm. however still made 242rwkw at 16psi. This turbo will make close to 400rwkw if pushed to its limit. thing is I don't want that much power for my street car hence I am down sizing :)

Ryanrb25 Grand Master

Ryanrb25

Posted
Posted

Just be careful mate a GT3582r with an Internally gated .63 rear will need either a much larger internal gate or youll run minimum 25psi....It doesn't flow enough out gate to regulate boost too well. We have one on my mates Rb20 and luckily its built to run 25psi...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • sunsetR33
      Anyone know this frontpipe?

      By sunsetR33 · Posted

      Hi all. So I have my GTR on the lift and have been working on it a few days and today I unpacked the frontpipe that was wrapped with heat wrap stuff, because part of it was breaking down and soaked in oil. Noticed that the pipe itself does not actually look like a Mines, despite it supposedly being a Mines. But I could not find any fronpipe online that looks exacly like his, and I don't think it is a custom one. My amateur measurement also showed the two pipes are about equal length, so maybe this is just an old version of the Mines pipe? Would appreciate insight on this by the enlightened folks. greetings from Germany
    • silviaz
      Skyline’s charcoal canister !

      By silviaz · Posted

      Yeah. If I plug the connector in and connect the vacuum lines, I assume worse case scenario is that it simply doesn't work? Yep PFC.
    • GTSBoy
      SR20 to cefiro

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      I would think that rather than attempting to perform an engine swap, with all the difficulties associated with doing so in a country where the raw materials required are harder to get hold of, I would just build the CA20 for boost, find an EFI manifold for it and either add a turbo or a supercharger. Or both. You replace one set of difficulties with a different set, but I know which would be more fun.
    • GTSBoy
      Skyline’s charcoal canister !

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, a proper aftermarket ECU** SHOULD be set up to run the purge solenoid, same as the factory ECU would, so that the tank breather system continues to operate the way it is supposed to. I have no knowledge of whether the PFC (which is what I assume you mean when you say Apexi) has an output (and internal logic) to run the purge solenoid. If it does not, then given the product design intent for the PFC, which is to be a plug in replacement for the stock ECU, I would consider that a massive failing on Apexi's behalf and would be another reason to think that they were a half-arsed solution to the problem if programmable management on RBs. I would suggest that since Nistune came to market (which is a LOOOOONG time ago now) there has been no valid argument for choosing a PFC, especially if the PFC can't do things like this.   **ie, Haltach, Link, Motec, etc
    • MBS206
      Shifting questions

      By MBS206 · Posted

      Thanks for asking the question we were all thinking!
×
×
  • Create New...