Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wanted to see if dropping out of drive to neutral as often as i could (stopped, rolling into lights) would make a difference to my fuel eco. Its made a huge different now getting about 100Km/10.1L. Just wondering if anyone can think of any reason why i shouldn't do this? possible damage to the transmission or the TC?

I wondered how the it goes finding and appropriate gear if i suddenly put it back into drive while rolling?

cheers

Well when you are stopped at the lights, the engine is under load in anything other than P or N, you can hear the engine unload when you select neutral,park. It does save fuel, it won't damage your gbox. I'd only select neutral when stopped thoiugh, not rolling along in case you need to accelerate in a split second etc.

I wondered how the it goes finding and appropriate gear if i suddenly put it back into drive while rolling?

I've got a friend who does this stupid trick in his manual, and yes it does save SOME fuel, BUT you are sacrificing a degree of control over the car. What if you suddenly need to speed up to avoid someone whose about to rear end you, or dive into the next lane to avoid a someone literally trying to 'merge' with you? In both situations, if you can't plant it and get yourself out of trouble, your a sitting duck. In my opinion, diminished ability to accelerate (or NO ability in this case) is equally as bad as diminished braking capability.

Oh and whatever you do, don't turn the engine off altogether while rolling, like a mate's mate did - the steering wheel locked up and he was killed in a head-on (no 5h1t).

Go buy a econobox if you can't afford the petrol.

Edited by sl33py

I understand what your saying, but I'm pretty selective when i chose to do it, only coming to a halt. I have been racking my brain but cannot think of a situation where planting it will get me out of an accident without causing one at the same time. I was almost taken out by a Hi-lux which got under steer coming around a corner and headed straight for me waiting at the lights, but even then pushing forward into the intersection would have caused an incident also.

I'm more concerned about doing damage to the drive chain. either the fuel saved is huge or my odometer is reading wrong because I'm getting 10.2L per 100Kms consistently without changing anything else.

I can come up with a good reason, its called lubrication. your gearbox has a pump in it the faster you go the more it pumps, if your putting it in N at speed it reduces the oil being pumped. might not sound much but over time it will all add up. At the lights is fine and does work just dont rev up b4 putting it in D, real quick way to blow a gearbox. If u really want to save fuel when ur coming to the lights take your foot off the throttle and pull it through the gears manually, with no throttle and more revs than idle the ecm wont need to let any fuel through to the engine.

Edited by cankas
cannot think of a situation where planting it will get me out of an accident

I know people who have accelerated to narrowly avoid being rear ended by a *^%&tard.

But you do what you want - you're in Bris, I'm in ACT - doesn't bother me :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi. A little bit of an update. It maybe(hope not) looks like i would need a new tranny(it would be "maybe" a cheaper or better option anyway) So i need some info. I know i need a different propshaft(i can make custom one) LSD is not a problem cuz the engine will be still(for now) N/A RB20. So if i buy RB25DET NEO tranny...is there something else i need? I read something about push/pull type but i do not know if i need to "change" something or i can just plug n play onto my engine a go? Thanks for the advice  
    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
×
×
  • Create New...