Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

wanted to see if dropping out of drive to neutral as often as i could (stopped, rolling into lights) would make a difference to my fuel eco. Its made a huge different now getting about 100Km/10.1L. Just wondering if anyone can think of any reason why i shouldn't do this? possible damage to the transmission or the TC?

I wondered how the it goes finding and appropriate gear if i suddenly put it back into drive while rolling?

cheers

Well when you are stopped at the lights, the engine is under load in anything other than P or N, you can hear the engine unload when you select neutral,park. It does save fuel, it won't damage your gbox. I'd only select neutral when stopped thoiugh, not rolling along in case you need to accelerate in a split second etc.

I wondered how the it goes finding and appropriate gear if i suddenly put it back into drive while rolling?

I've got a friend who does this stupid trick in his manual, and yes it does save SOME fuel, BUT you are sacrificing a degree of control over the car. What if you suddenly need to speed up to avoid someone whose about to rear end you, or dive into the next lane to avoid a someone literally trying to 'merge' with you? In both situations, if you can't plant it and get yourself out of trouble, your a sitting duck. In my opinion, diminished ability to accelerate (or NO ability in this case) is equally as bad as diminished braking capability.

Oh and whatever you do, don't turn the engine off altogether while rolling, like a mate's mate did - the steering wheel locked up and he was killed in a head-on (no 5h1t).

Go buy a econobox if you can't afford the petrol.

Edited by sl33py

I understand what your saying, but I'm pretty selective when i chose to do it, only coming to a halt. I have been racking my brain but cannot think of a situation where planting it will get me out of an accident without causing one at the same time. I was almost taken out by a Hi-lux which got under steer coming around a corner and headed straight for me waiting at the lights, but even then pushing forward into the intersection would have caused an incident also.

I'm more concerned about doing damage to the drive chain. either the fuel saved is huge or my odometer is reading wrong because I'm getting 10.2L per 100Kms consistently without changing anything else.

I can come up with a good reason, its called lubrication. your gearbox has a pump in it the faster you go the more it pumps, if your putting it in N at speed it reduces the oil being pumped. might not sound much but over time it will all add up. At the lights is fine and does work just dont rev up b4 putting it in D, real quick way to blow a gearbox. If u really want to save fuel when ur coming to the lights take your foot off the throttle and pull it through the gears manually, with no throttle and more revs than idle the ecm wont need to let any fuel through to the engine.

Edited by cankas
cannot think of a situation where planting it will get me out of an accident

I know people who have accelerated to narrowly avoid being rear ended by a *^%&tard.

But you do what you want - you're in Bris, I'm in ACT - doesn't bother me :ninja:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...