Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My car (r34 vs2) is stuck at the compliance shop. I get different

stories but basically it barely starts and if it does it doesn't hold. Initially they said

the injectors were getting pulse but now they say they are not. Runs for two seconds,

they said. Plugs checked and not fouled. ECU is nismo, not stock, but must be close.

No check engine light. Alarm disarmed.

I call tuning shops and they are all backed up, and/or need the car flatbed to them and

back. I'm having trouble with the idea that it is a major problem as the car came

from zele and they don't have cars in their showroom that can't even be started.

Anyone here know someone who can do a visit (south brisbane) to diagnose the problem

at least to the point of being sure it needs to go to a tuning shop?

please PM me.. running out of options. If it won't start, it can't get complied -- I'm trying

to avoid more flatbed trips, charges mounting up.

thanks!

Edited by r34nur
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/234568-mobile-efimechanic-guy/
Share on other sites

Hey mate,

Spoke to Barry twice this afternoon. By the time I rang him he had already sent it up to another diagnostic guy. He is a German fellow that does ECU diagnostics for a living. Hopefully he will have some success with it but when I spoke to Barry at the end of the day he had not made any progress. He said the car will not turn over now.

Barry mentioned to me something about the two immobilisers but I think we can do something to bypass these. I also think there may be any issue with the Nismo ECU. I don't know if you are the same bloke that I have spoken to on a couple of different occasions regarding the Nismo ECU in your R34 GTR but if not, then that's ok. I will be heading down there with some diagnostic equipment tomorrow at lunch so if the German bloke has no luck with it, hopefully I will be able to tell Barry why it won't go.

Cheers, Daniel

Hey mate,

Spoke to Barry twice this afternoon. By the time I rang him he had already sent it up to another diagnostic guy. He is a German fellow that does ECU diagnostics for a living. Hopefully he will have some success with it but when I spoke to Barry at the end of the day he had not made any progress. He said the car will not turn over now.

Barry mentioned to me something about the two immobilisers but I think we can do something to bypass these. I also think there may be any issue with the Nismo ECU. I don't know if you are the same bloke that I have spoken to on a couple of different occasions regarding the Nismo ECU in your R34 GTR but if not, then that's ok. I will be heading down there with some diagnostic equipment tomorrow at lunch so if the German bloke has no luck with it, hopefully I will be able to tell Barry why it won't go.

Cheers, Daniel

thanks mate, I really appreciate it.

The immobilizers (factory and clifford) keep getting blamed but the clifford is 100% off/disarmed/inactive..

so that just leaves the factory nissan alarm. Presumably it indicates its state via the red light on the dash,

and is a lot simpler than the clifford.. you press unlock, and hear the door locks chunk.. starter motor wouldn't

even turn over if the factory alarm was getting in the way. And the clifford guy points out that when the

clifford arms nothing lights up: no dash, no starter, nothing. So I really don't see how it can be an immobilizer

unless its a third secret hidden one.

I look forward to what today brings. So far we've had Barry, an alarm expert, Warren (another alarm expert

but with all the clifford software) and someone else with a nissan consult interface, now this german guy

and probably you as well. This car is turning into a serial killer of experts ... I am scared of seeing the final bill

for "compliance", lol.

I'm sure everyone is on the edge of their seats on this one so I'll wrap it up with a semi-happy ending:

$180 spent on the above-mentioned german fellow traced the fault to the nissan factory immobilizer .. which was beaten back into shape somehow, and now the car runs as it should have to begin with! I should be able to get my hands on the thing by next week now after compliance finishes up.

Tossing up whether to drive it down sans-plates to sydney, or ship it down..

I'm sure everyone is on the edge of their seats on this one so I'll wrap it up with a semi-happy ending:

$180 spent on the above-mentioned german fellow traced the fault to the nissan factory immobilizer .. which was beaten back into shape somehow, and now the car runs as it should have to begin with! I should be able to get my hands on the thing by next week now after compliance finishes up.

Tossing up whether to drive it down sans-plates to sydney, or ship it down..

Fly up, I'll give you a beer for your trouble and drive the thing back to Sydney so you can teach it a lesson on the way home.

Inland route isn't bad, and is generally quicker time-wise than the coast route (despite being ~30km longer). Last time we went to Sydney we came back by heading west via Musswelbrook, then north through Tamworth (we have a photo of the 33 parked in front of the Golden Guitar lol), Armidale etc, then east to Coffs via Bellingen, then up the coast. If you want to go inland the whole way, instead of heading to Coffs you can continue north via Glenn Innes and Tenterfield and come out around Warwick.

Reverse this for your purposes of course but that's how we plot our trips back from Sydney :banana:

how about max octane fuel en-route :banana:
We had no problems getting 98 the whole way. Make sure you fill up just inside the Qld border though, fuel jumps in price once you hit NSW.

Coffs Harbour, Armidale, Muswellbrook should all have 98, if you need to stop before you make it to Sydney you can stop at Hexham or Wyong. I'm not sure about going via Tenterfield, they may or may not have 98 so if you need that, you're safer heading south to Coffs then west to Armidale, then south from there to Musswelbrook, then head towards Sydney.

done the coast road several times, byron, nimbin and all that jazz

but is an inland route worth doing? mountains forests .. ?

how about max octane fuel en-route :)

So how long till you finally came out of nimbin.. hemp-bar lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean I can be OCD'y but this is really over the top. At that point why not just run a full wideband fuel controller? Especially if you run 3 widebands. The system works pretty well, which is trimming low load stuff to be within a few percent of the base map. Pre-engine _change_ the base map was only 1-2% off, depending on ambient temp, elevation, etc. Under load the LS is really very straightforward to tune, enough that a wideband closed loop would be overkill. If I really cared (and I hope I don't) I can always just go back to the MAF system the car actually came with. Which does all those nice calculations for me (temp, altitude, etc), now that you can buy 102mm MAF's that do not cause restrictions.
    • Good afternoon Team , just a quick update on performance mods  Current Mods list (Installed) HKS - Power Editor (Came with the car) looks to be some kind of boost controller RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Cat Back  RV37 Skyline 400R (SKYLINE) | FUJITSUBO  - Front Pipe AMS  - INFINITI Q50/Q60 RED ALPHA COLD AIR INTAKE KIT AMS  - Performance Heat Exchanger Intercooler Not Yet AMS Alpha Performance Full Race Down Pipes  - to be installed in May 
    • I'd be installing 2x widebands and using the NB simulation outputs to the ECU.
    • Nah, it's different across different engines and as the years went on. R32 era RB20, and hence also RB26, the TPS SWITCH is the idle command. The variable resistor is only for the TCU, as you say. On R33 era RB25 and onwards (but probably not RB26, as they still used the same basic ECU from the R32 era), the idle command is a voltage output of close to 0.45V from the variable resistor.
    • It's actually one of the worst bits of Nissan nomenclature (also compounded by wiring diagrams when the TCU is incorporated in ECU, or, ECU has a passthru to a standalone TCU).... the gripe ~ they call it the TPS, but with an A/T it's actually a combined unit ...TPS (throttle position switch) + TPS (throttle position sensor).... ..by the looks of it (and considering car is A/T) you have this unit... https://www.amayama.com/en/part/nissan/2262002u11 The connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit, is the TPS (throttle position sensor) ...only the TCU reads this. The connector on the unit body, is the TPS (throttle position switch) ...ECU reads this. It has 3 possible values -- throttle closed (idle control contact), open (both contacts open, ECU controls engine...'run' mode), and WOT (full throttle contact closed, ECU changes mapping). When the throttle is closed (idle control contact), this activates what the patent describes as the 'anti stall system' ~ this has the ECU keep the engine at idling speed, regardless of additional load/variances (alternator load mostly, along with engine temp), and drives the IACV solenoid with PWM signal to adjust the idle air admittance to do this. This is actually a specific ECCS software mode, that only gets utilized when the idle control contact is closed. When you rotate the TPS unit as shown, you're opening the idle control contact, which puts ECCS into 'run' mode (no idle control), which obviously is a non-sequitur without the engine started/running ; if the buzzing is coming from the IACV solenoid, then likely ECCS is freaking out, and trying to raise engine rpm 'any way it can'...so it's likely pulling the valve wide open....this is prolly what's going on there. The signal from the connector on the flying lead coming out of the unit (for the TCU), should be around 0.4volts with the throttle closed (idle position) ~ although this does effect low throttle shift points if set wrong, the primary purpose here is to tell TCU engine is at idle (no throttle demand), and in response lower the A/T line pressure ... this is often described as how much 'creep' you get with shifter in D at idle. The way the TPS unit is setup (physically), ensures the idle control contact closes with a high margin on the TPSensor signal wire, so you can rotate the unit on the adjustment slots, to achieve 0.4v whilst knowing the idle control contact is definitely closed. The IACV solenoid is powered by battery voltage via a fuse, and ground switched (PWM) by the ECU. When I check them, I typically remove the harness plug, feed the solenoid battery voltage and switch it to ground via a 5watt bulb test probe ; thing should click wide open, and idle rpm should increase... ...that said though, if it starts & idles with the TPS unit disconnected, and it still stalls when it gets up to operating temperature, it won't be the IACV because it's unused, which would infer something else is winking out...  
×
×
  • Create New...