Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Next door, she drives a R33 GTST S2 97 and just under 300tho I think from memory.

Her engine runs very nicely still. Her ABS just went recently though.

I own R33 GTS 95, NA

102,500

My old R34 was 1999 model with log books for 47,000km....when it was stolen (repairable write-off) in 2005 it had 160,000km.

Reappeared on Paramatta Rd with 35,000kms :P

Current R34 is a 1998 model with log books for 27,000km, just hit 100,000 the other day

mine had 85,000 ks when i got it 3 yrs ago now showing 115.000ks thats about 10.000ks a yr plob slow down a bit now as it just sits in the garage hasent been driven for about 4 or 5 weeks just lost intrest in them really the novelty of been a skyline owner has worn off .

and how many of these odometers are genuwine?????? lol none

I think it's undeniable there is a common trend in odo readings. Although if you've got log book proof, you'd be fine to believe yours is genuine.

The people that have theirs in the 100k+ figures are just people that drive their cars as dailys and manage to clock plenty of kms fast. I've clocked 40 000 odd in the 2 and half years of ownership of my vehicle. Bought it with 97 000, which I knew was a pretty whacked figure for a 93 model car and had to have been tampered with.

Edited by KeyMaker

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, there's a very minor drift left that happens a few seconds after letting go of the steering wheel, but not enough to bother me. Enjoying the car still!
    • Got you mate. Check your email!
    • I see you've never had to push start your own car... You could save some weight right now...
    • Sounds good.  I don't 100% understand what your getting at here. When you say, "I keep seeing YouTube videos where people have new paint and primer land on the old clearcoat that isn't even dulled down" do you mean this - there is a panel with factory paint, without any prep work, they paint the entire panel with primer, then colour then clear?  If that's what you mean, sure it will "stick" for a year, 2 years, maybe 3 years? Who knows. But at some stage it will flake off and when it does it's going to come off in huge chunks and look horrific.  Of course read your technical data sheet for your paint, but generally speaking, you can apply primer to a scuffed/prepped clear coat. Generally speaking, I wouldn't do this. I would scuff/prep the clear and then lay colour then clear. Adding the primer to these steps just adds cost and time. It will stick to the clear coat provided it has been appropriately scuffed/prepped first.  When you say, "but the new paint is landing on the old clearcoat" I am imagining someone not masking up the car and just letting overspray go wherever it wants. Surely this isn't what you mean?  So I'll assume the following scenario - there is a small scratch. The person manages to somehow fill the scratch and now has a perfectly flat surface. They then spray colour and clear over this small masked off section of the car. Is this what you mean? If this is the case, yes the new paint will eventually flake off in X number of years time.  The easy solution is to scuff/prep all of the paint that hasn't been masked off in the repair area then lay the paint.  So you want to prep the surface, lay primer, then lay filler, then lay primer, then colour, then clear?  Life seems so much simpler if you prep, fill, primer, colour then clear.  There are very few reasons to go to bare metal. Chasing rust is a good example of why you'd go to bare metal.  A simple dent, there is no way in hell I'm going to bare metal for that repair. I've got enough on my plate without creating extra work for myself lol. 
×
×
  • Create New...