Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey, if you're looking for a 1989 R32 GTR and worried about the fifteen year rule, buy mine :P

It's already here, complianced and registered in Queensland.

See R32 GTR MUST SELL in Classifieds (Whole Cars)

I bought it off a guy who personally imported it in 1999, has all plates etc (he lived in Japan, was married to Japanese woman, they came back here to live and he brought the car, she decided she didn't like Australia, so they went back there to live and he sold me the car).

All this fifteen year stuff is muddying the waters and making it a bit harder to sell a car, so take advantage of me and my lower price without the risk of being stuck with a car sitting on a dock or in storage.

Just doing a bit more looking around (particularly DOTARS site).

My understanding:

- the first R32 GTR was made in August 1989 (but only about 50 that month, first full month of production (around 1000?) was September '89)

- you need an Import Approval before your car leaves Japan (or at least before the ships enters the destination port)

- it takes 30 days to process an Import Approval application

- the car has to be 15 years old to the month before you make the application for an Import Approval

then I suppose the first R32 GTRs to arrive under the 15 year rule will be August/September 2004 + time to process application + time to send to Australia = October/November/December 2004??? (how long does it take to arrange transport and get car from Japan to Australia once you have an Import Approval?)

Sound right?

...and finally, the only savings relate to the cost of DOTARS compliance, but there is a cost increase in State Transport Department compliance, and maybe a rise in GTR prices in Japan if demand is high enough, or people are trying to recoup the cost of having a car sitting in Japan for up to 12-15 mths waiting to get an Import Approval if they have mis-timed things?

So what will a R32 GTR REALLY cost at dealers from end of 2004/beginning of 2005 under the 15 year rule?

The prices will go up and the time delay will throw the whole thing out as the car isnt to leave Japan till the import approval has been issued.

So if Customs and DOTRS were around looking at your paperwork and your import approval was issued 3 days before the car arrived it wouldnt take much to work out that the car was sent with out a import approval in your possesion so if the rule was pushed they could make you re-export the car or destroy it.

We were working out delivery times in to Fremantle and waiting for import approvals the car would be sitting in Japan for around 2 months waiting since we only get a boat once a month.

Hey Driftt.

I think your mistaken there.

Now from what DOTARS actually say a vehicle is considered imported once it ENTERS the port where it is to land.

"An Import Approval MUST be obtained before a vehicle is imported. Importation occurs once the vehicle is brought within a port for the purposes of landing it. For example, a vehicle being transported by ship is “imported” once the ships enters the destination port. "

That is a direct quote from DOTARS.

Glenn

My mistake how about when you clear you vehicle and the date of issue is after the date the vehicle landed.

Import approvals cannot be issued for vehicles that have been imported.

Do not ship your vehicle to Australia until such time as you are issued with an Import Approval.

If you do ship your vehicle before receiving an approval and your vehicle arrives before the application is processed, an approval cannot be issued.

A lot of vehicles have been turning up before the import aproval has been issued due to the time frame it takes to process a import approval.

Last month 50 cars came on the boat with no import aprovals that had to be rexported due to vehicles being sold to people who dont understand the rules.

Every part of importing a car is being looked at including the approvals.

Its not a story like saying nothing is changing on the 15 year rule.

It takes so long to get an approval because of the amount of 15 year cars being bought in to Australia and DOTRS have put a lot more staff on to process the extra paperwok.

Import groups and the government want to cap the amount of cars coming in under any rule so unless you want a clean low klm car dont bother.

Import approvals are now taking as long as 30+ days to process,the delay seems to be in staffing with-in the Dept, and the usual give a F%$CK attitude constantly being displayed by our Federal friends.

It is allways a "smart move" to have the IA in hand before you ship your vehicle, although a vehicle is not officially classed as imported until the customs entry has been made.therefore if you import a vehicle and factor in a 14-20 day turnaround for your IA and your vehicle arrives and you still have not recieved your IA (it happens) DONT let your agent enter it , cop the storage . As the vehicle has no status until the entry is made and the Feds have no info on its wereabouts until that time.

We put three in two weeks or so apart for 15 year cars and all turned up together and one was in 17 days and one in 30 so it varys on the work load.

RAWS and 15 year import approvals are done in different areas as far as I know and with in 2 to 3 days of posting the cheque is banked so you might save one day.

You can email 15 year ones I have been told but you need credit card details and I might honestly save you a day or two.

I lived in Japan for a couple of years and was bringing cars to Australia on a small scale a few years back, when the major changes took place. (Most punters don't realize until ages afterwards, I found that even almost 2 years after i arrived back your average car enthusiast punter was just starting to catch on, even though the 2 year sunset period for existing compliance plate holders had almost run its course!!)

I found at that time the laws changed very rapidly indeed, I followed all the legislative changes very carefully and checked the DOTARS daily,( there was chopping and changing on almost a weekly basis, sometimes less). IF I were thinking of importing a car now, when there a rumours of changes to laws, I would be doing the same thing, if you didn't you'd be a mug. I have seen people who have had to re- export cars personally and there's no excuse, they just issue you with a notice and give you a month or so and its out.

There are powerful lobby groups at work when these changes are in the wind, for example a certain major car manufacturer,, (which will remain nameless), was a very strong lobbyist just before the big review took place in 2000, (it was strongly rumuored), that led to the current scheme that's in place.

There is usually some substance in rumours, maybe other parties have been at work who may have been effected by the growing import of 15 year old used JDM vehicles!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...