Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeah sounds a bit too high, my 34 with exhuast, fmic, ~9psi, pod makes 185rwkw, so id guess on 11psi ish youd be at 185rwkw-190rwkw. how have you achieved that boost increase?

Jeff at turbo tune said something on the lines of the stock solenoid has a high and low setting. Mine started at 6 psi and then made its way up to around 11.5. When I get the dyno sheet scanned you'll see where the boost increase will be.

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

auto salon was dead on actually. i had just got my car dyno tuned at boost worx a week prior and it made 2kws more than it had been tuned for.

anywho.. i dont find it hard to believe 200. i mean 11.5 is lot of boost for a rb25.

The Autosalon dyno was the Graham West dyno, yeah?

correct cronic.

Zak, yeah you've got a real gem of a 33 there, seems your fmic and exhuast is working very nicely with your engine.

And Steve, i was just asking how he achieved the boost increase, a jump to 11.5psi from just minor mods isn't seen too often.

Edited by Damo_R34

yeah i edited that, it came out completely wrong lol. 6psi sounds like a fair gain in boost, i wouldn't mind having mine looked at. Guess i'd start with hi flow/no cat and removing the restrictor.

201 is a too me sounds about right.

i made 205 with the same sorta mods when i had me ebc fitted and set at 11 psi...

got alot more now though :P :P

Edited by craig R33
he wont be able to add it now Dale, you have 10 mins to edit your post unfortunately. Has a nice increase at 150kw's, Jumps to 170!

I think you'll find that that is AFR related. the factory maps are a bit all over the place as they are only tested at certain points in the rev range not over the whole range. So at the points were they are tested they have good emission's and every where else it's tuned for safe power.

Zac has an SAFC II in the car but it hasn't been played with at this stage and has 0 correction factor at every point so when he takes it to Jeff next the AFR's will be more constant and there will be a bit more power (~10kw).

P.S. thanks for letting me know about the editing time, I never could figure out why you could edit your post some time but not others. On NS where I do most of my posting you can edit it any time. I guess it pays to be a post whore on more than one forum.

Edited by D_Stirls
wheres the Dyno settings at the bottom Dale

i thought it was more like 30mins editing either way we need editing rights

I'm not sure where the info is, I just checked the printout and it's not on there.

But I also looked at the printouts for my car that were done on the same dyno and there aren't on there so it might be the way TT have there printouts setup. I would say the the temp are correct because every time I have seen Jeff drive a car on the dyno the first thing he does is enter the humidity and temp from the weather station they have setup next to the dyno.

Ive been in and driven IZZMO 33's car and it feels very much like 200+rwkw with minimal mods aswell..very impressive.

to me that dyno is reading a wee bit too high

i had my car dynoed at Willall Racing and they use a mainline dyno

with a front mount, boost increase to 9psi, full zorst, splitfire coilpacks, pod....my car made 188.7 rwkw on a reasonably warm day

so from the mods that you are saying you have i would expect the same sort of power that my car has pulled out

plus no boost controller and ur hitting 11.5psi....umm have you had that reading out off a boost gague or from the stock gauge.

My R31 with series 1 rb25det and my r33 with series 2 rb25det both made 203rwkw and 205rwkw with 10psi, cooler and exhaust on a few different dyno's give or take 3-5kw

You WOULD have about 200rwkw if there was an aftermarket computer or your ecu has been remapped........

not necessary mate. Every car is different.

over 30 posts and no one has mentioned ramp rates.

how much brake against the rollers.........you need to compare apples for apples

God dam it pete, you beat me to it! hehehe

People dont realise that its up to the dyno operator to choose the specific ramp rate that the dyno produces...this alters your power output...usually a standard ramp rate for these things is around 150.

So many people are quick to assume every car is the same and will make simular power with simular mods. Every car is different. So many variables come into play when it comes to output on a dyno...remember people its just a number.

Edited by Ryanrb25

oh and i forgot to mention we've had plenty of 33's on the dyno at Aussies and alot of them make good power (190-200rwkw) with basic mods yet others make average power (160-180rwkw) with simular mods...SO many variables. Believe it or not other cars have had a much harsher life than others.

Edited by Ryanrb25
oh and i forgot to mention we've had plenty of 33's on the dyno at Aussies and alot of them make good power (190-200rwkw) with basic mods yet others make average power (160-180rwkw) with simular mods...SO many variables. Believe it or not other cars have had a much harsher life than others.

and some over 300rwkw Ryan...lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
×
×
  • Create New...