Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Am currently building an RB30DET with GT3582R for my Stagea.

Car will be running straight LPG via gasresearch products (twin convertors, 440 throttlebody, CTI etc) For this reason I only need an ECU to control ignition and was hoping to use the standard ECU along with an Apexi Super ITC... HOWEVER I am worried about hitting R&R. Will a single or twin Z32 AFM's fix this problem?

Also can I have the ECU remapped in order to remove the R&R feature, remove the speed limiter & have the rev limiter lifted to a higher RPM??? Would prefer not to use an aftermarket ECU if possible...

Edited by inmate
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235556-standard-stagea-ecu-avoiding-rr/
Share on other sites

I thought about gas injection but chose to stick with GRA for the following reasons:

1. I would need to go duel fuel which would be a compromise in performance/tuning.

2. I don't want a gas tank in the cargo area. It defeats the purpose of owning a wagon.

3. I already have the GRA gear here from my previous ride.

Am currently building an RB30DET with GT3582R for my Stagea.

Car will be running straight LPG via gasresearch products (twin convertors, 440 throttlebody, CTI etc) For this reason I only need an ECU to control ignition and was hoping to use the standard ECU along with an Apexi Super ITC... HOWEVER I am worried about hitting R&R. Will a single or twin Z32 AFM's fix this problem?

Also can I have the ECU remapped in order to remove the R&R feature, remove the speed limiter & have the rev limiter lifted to a higher RPM??? Would prefer not to use an aftermarket ECU if possible...

You can avoid R&R with an Apexi SITC and SAFC (or the Jaycar DFA) and a good boost controller such as Jaycar EIBC.

There are at least a couple of guys on this forum who will remap your ECU: Toshi and Dr Drift

A piggyback or any stand alone ECU would suit my needs but would be a waste of money as I do not need any fuel mapping at all. The GRA system has a closed loop injection system which controls gas supply via the standard sensors so spending $1000+ on 1 of the above just to control the ignition is pointless IMO. I have found that I can purchase an ignition only ECU from Microtech although this is not much cheaper than buying a fuel/ignition system OR another option is a 2nd hand Haltech IG5 (they are no longer in production)...

Microtech = approx $950 for ignition only so not very cost effective.

Haltech = approx $500 for ignition only & is as rare as hens teeth.

UPDATE:

I have spoken to Toshi & having the ECU remapped is deffinately a possibility.

If I chose this route I won't need the SITC as he can adjust timing to suit. Hmm decisions, decisions...

Edited by inmate

I am running similar dedicated LPG GRA system to yours on my Stagea (Series II) + SITC, mostly stock.

My CAS is advanced all the way and my SITC settings are:

800 rpm, +15 degrees

2400 rpm, +15 degrees

4000 rpm, +5 degrees

5600 rpm, -7 degrees

7200 rpm, -7 degrees

I don't know exactly what these equate to as total timing advance but it is a lot and the car can still do with more up to 2400 rpm (no sign of detonation at all).

Your tuner will need a lot of time (preferrably on dyno) to get your ignition advance sorted which ever way you go, however the results with dedicated LPG will be startling and well worth the effort!

The SAFC piggy back to minipulate AFM signals + SITC is another way to go to combat R&R.

The RB30DET VL guys on dedicated LPG I know go for the Microtech or Haltech for ignition control (only), but that is because they don't have other options like us, SITC etc.

How flexible is the remap ECU with ignition timing if you wanted to do some minor changes later on?

and will you be able to control your timing curve throughout the rev range (individually) like the SITC if you needed to without taking it to a specialised workshop? Remember you will need a lot of initial advance and then need to take degrees out as you come on boost (even more so with LPG).

Decisions, decisions.

I would be interested in your final decision as I may go down the more modification path in the future.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...