Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Were they run on the same dyno??

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

dirt can you post up bp98 tune as well because i want to see comparison of hks t04z with garrett t04z on same fuel

mine made 428rwkw on 24psi (garrett) and another has made 468rwkw on 25psi (garrett). both were standard stroke 2.6l's

is this a 2.6l?

Yes still 2.6 & it made 422rwkw on 22psi & was on synergy8000.

my hks t04z has gone 585rwhp (440rwkw from my calculation) on 18psi on 98 pump fuel on a very very low reading dyno, another brand new dyno dynamics one i went on recently read 40hp more (520hp to 560hp) on lower boost tune, so i reckon it would of been a bit over 600rwhp on any other dyno.

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

actually it was a different dyno i think, cause my car was tuned on the new 4wd dyno (in 2wd) and chookos was on the old 2wd one

chookos made 454rwkw or 608rwhp with similar tune to mine, but made more with cam timing and further tuning. my cams never got moved from zero so may have been a little more in it!

same tuner, same workshop, same fuel and very similar engines etc etc

ok, could my standard valve springs and 260 poncams be limiting my power on 24 psi with a t04z to 376awkw (.84 split a/r ex housing)..???

Just a little bit, Dave. :bunny:

PS, I'm still waiting!

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

lol Simon, he has never done a power tune on my car only a run in tune on the first motor years ago ;) everyone knows he wont touch an autronic ecu hence why i never used him in the end.

Edited by unique1
interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

Simon's time (10.91 @ 132 with 460rwkw) was with a stock gearbox and $90 shitty tyres.

At 3256lbs (std 32 GTR weight) and 485hp (360rwkw) you shouldn't be running 134mph, more like 124mph.

Can I ask what turbo was used?

Let me guess, it's a 700+hp rated turbo, running in its peak efficiency, and "only" making 485hp at the treads. I'd suspect a very low reading dyno....

Besides the point, all I want to see is a compo between a HKS T04Z and Garrett version, someone post dyno's!!

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

im pretty sure he ran around 134mph on another pass...

he was also running standard box so change from 2nd to 3rd was slower than leasurely which would have dropped the mph a fair bit i would imagine.

GRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSSSSSSSSS

r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

another r32 gtr with n1's went hi 11s @ 125mph, he had just over 300rwkw. Wasnt a fancy set up either.

My boat did 139.67mph with 456 rwkw although only 10.70 with 1.57 best 60 foot. It had 540 pound springs at the time in rear, yes way too hard and wouldn't weight transfer, and front diff not there.

PS Good power Dave and good result. PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

jpzed108a.jpg

Edited by Boosted Zed
r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

LOL

HKS T51R... SPL or KAI? Either way its a ~900hp rated turbo, and you reckon it only makes 450rwhp.

Either it's being transfered through a rubber driveline or it's running 14psi.

As I said, thats one hell of a low reading dyno. It's physically not possible for a car that weighs as much as a GT-R to do ~135mph with 450rwhp.

PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

No they would be about the same...the gears are the same basic design albeit a more agressive tooth profile and far superior parent material on the PPG. The way each gear is selected whether it be dog engagement or synchromesh has little bearing on the losses after the gear is selected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Price seems pretty good to me. Also seems a hell of a lot cheaper then buying another vehicle that only ever gets used for towing.  I'm a long way from you mate, I'm a couple of hours out of Brizzy. 
    • New [400]Z, they're available in manual and you don't have to worry about parts scarcity. 
    • Just planning to have the wiring neat and hide as much as possible.
    • The sodium acetate, mixed with citric acid, doesn't actually buffer each other. Interestingly though, if you used Sodium Acetate, and acetic acid, THAT becomes a buffer solution. Additionally, a weak acid that can attack a metal, is still a weak acid that can attack a metal. If you don't neutralise it, and wash it off, it's going to be able to keep attacking. It works the same way when battery acid dries, get that stuff somewhere, and then it gets wet, and off it goes again breaking things down. There's a reason why people prefer a weak acid, and it's because they want TIME to be able to be on their side. IE, DIY guys are happy to leave some mild steel in vinegar for 24 hours to get mill scale off. However, if you want to do it chemically in industry, you grab the muriatic acid. If you want to do it quicker at home, go for the acetic acid if you don't want muriatic around. At the end of the day, look at the above thumbnail, as it proves what I said in the earlier post, you can clean that fuel tank up all you want with the solution, but the rust that has now been removed was once the metal of the fuel tank. So how thin in spots is your fuel tank getting? If the magazine on the left, is the actual same magazine as on the right, you'll notice it even introduces more holes... Well, rust removal in general actually does that. The fuel tank isn't very thick. So, I'll state again, look to replace the tank, replace the fuel hanger, and pump, work out how the rust and shit is making it past the fuel filter, and getting into the injectors. That is the real problem. If the fuel filter were doing its job, the injectors wouldn't be blocked.
    • Despite having minimal clothing because of the hot weather right now, I did have rubber gloves and safety glasses on just in-case for most of the time. Yes, I was scrubbing with my gloves on before, but brushing with a brush removes the remaining rust. To neutralize, I was thinking distilled water and baking soda, or do you think that would be overkill?
  • Create New...