Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Were they run on the same dyno??

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

dirt can you post up bp98 tune as well because i want to see comparison of hks t04z with garrett t04z on same fuel

mine made 428rwkw on 24psi (garrett) and another has made 468rwkw on 25psi (garrett). both were standard stroke 2.6l's

is this a 2.6l?

Yes still 2.6 & it made 422rwkw on 22psi & was on synergy8000.

my hks t04z has gone 585rwhp (440rwkw from my calculation) on 18psi on 98 pump fuel on a very very low reading dyno, another brand new dyno dynamics one i went on recently read 40hp more (520hp to 560hp) on lower boost tune, so i reckon it would of been a bit over 600rwhp on any other dyno.

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

actually it was a different dyno i think, cause my car was tuned on the new 4wd dyno (in 2wd) and chookos was on the old 2wd one

chookos made 454rwkw or 608rwhp with similar tune to mine, but made more with cam timing and further tuning. my cams never got moved from zero so may have been a little more in it!

same tuner, same workshop, same fuel and very similar engines etc etc

ok, could my standard valve springs and 260 poncams be limiting my power on 24 psi with a t04z to 376awkw (.84 split a/r ex housing)..???

Just a little bit, Dave. :bunny:

PS, I'm still waiting!

Yes, exact same dyno. Dyno Dynamics in Shootout mode.

and the 468rwkw one has run 132mph.

Can you post sheets please? Will help a lot of people decide if the HKS turbo is worth the 2k more...

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

brad!!!

clearly you should know you had about 150rwhp of timing in that tune to make that power

PING IS POWER

lol Simon, he has never done a power tune on my car only a run in tune on the first motor years ago ;) everyone knows he wont touch an autronic ecu hence why i never used him in the end.

Edited by unique1
interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

Simon's time (10.91 @ 132 with 460rwkw) was with a stock gearbox and $90 shitty tyres.

At 3256lbs (std 32 GTR weight) and 485hp (360rwkw) you shouldn't be running 134mph, more like 124mph.

Can I ask what turbo was used?

Let me guess, it's a 700+hp rated turbo, running in its peak efficiency, and "only" making 485hp at the treads. I'd suspect a very low reading dyno....

Besides the point, all I want to see is a compo between a HKS T04Z and Garrett version, someone post dyno's!!

interesting for me, that youve only run 132mph with 460rwkw. Ive seen an r32 gtr with 360rwkw go 134mph @ 10.8

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

something im struggling to believe unless it was a super low weighted car with a dog-box on slicks and with that ET i doubt it.

134MPH = at the very least 400AWKW in a R32 GTR

im pretty sure he ran around 134mph on another pass...

he was also running standard box so change from 2nd to 3rd was slower than leasurely which would have dropped the mph a fair bit i would imagine.

GRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHSSSSSSSSSSSS

r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

another r32 gtr with n1's went hi 11s @ 125mph, he had just over 300rwkw. Wasnt a fancy set up either.

My boat did 139.67mph with 456 rwkw although only 10.70 with 1.57 best 60 foot. It had 540 pound springs at the time in rear, yes way too hard and wouldn't weight transfer, and front diff not there.

PS Good power Dave and good result. PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

jpzed108a.jpg

Edited by Boosted Zed
r32 gtr, os giken gear set, hks t51r. Not sure if it was lightended, il have to ask him next time i see him.

LOL

HKS T51R... SPL or KAI? Either way its a ~900hp rated turbo, and you reckon it only makes 450rwhp.

Either it's being transfered through a rubber driveline or it's running 14psi.

As I said, thats one hell of a low reading dyno. It's physically not possible for a car that weighs as much as a GT-R to do ~135mph with 450rwhp.

PPG helical dog box would have less power drain I guess over stock synchro box??

No they would be about the same...the gears are the same basic design albeit a more agressive tooth profile and far superior parent material on the PPG. The way each gear is selected whether it be dog engagement or synchromesh has little bearing on the losses after the gear is selected.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh and my rear arms may need some attention too.    
    • Bushings are almost done. Check the date stamp 😂 these are likely the original bushings with 27 years and 243ks on them.     Was too dark to get a pic of the worst one.
    • Porous blocks are a known issue on something like a Porsche M96, it's not really something I've ever heard of on an RB26. It's possible what people thought was a "porous block" was really a cracked block that they just didn't spot the crack on.
    • This is a controversial subject really, the whole power vs fun thing I mean And this is the main reason I got back into a MX5 Of the last few notable daily cars I've owned whilst I have frequented SAU R33 GTS-t: fun, but because I'm a idiot I modified well past a reliable fun car and ended up hating it, although that was my fault because I tried to have a daily cruiser and race car all in one, the family called it the sometimes car, because sometimes it was working, sometimes it was broken, gladly sold it NB MX5: brilliant car, thrashed the Bejebus out of it, but, again, was stupid and deleted the air con, power steering and stripped the interior out, whilst still fun, and reliable, and super cheap on consumables, it was not a fun place to be going on long cruises, I did love it, but basically every family member hated going anywhere in it, sadly sold it 2015 WRX STI: soulless thing that looked like your average Kia sedan and had that horrible boxer engine with glass ringlands, the family did like it though, that thing was one of my stupidest purchases and I still regret it 2017 Toyota 86: 😪 if I didn't crash it, I would probably still have it, it was a fun little thing, even with that horrible boxer engine, the family did like it, the only reason I didn't get another 86, or, BRZ was the boxer engine, I should have learnt after owning the STI, but I'm a idiot VX SS: great cruiser, fits the whole family, and was fast as.....in a straight line, but a big fat thing, so no enjoyment throwing it around corners, the family was unimpressed with the whole boganness of if, but they did admit it was a comfy place to sit on long cruises As for the NC, I feel it is perfect for what I want, or need out of of a car, whether I'm cruising the Hwy, back roads, twisties or peak hour traffic, the Mrs doesn't mind driving it either, or cruising in it as well, although she does bump her head of the roof nearly every time she gets in, which is farking hilarious, and the kids love taking it for a thrash as well So basically, I've had constantly more fun, and way less headache and heartache, both on the track and on the street, in low powered cars,  go figure.....LOL One thing though, the Mrs has stated that the cams have made the exhaust sound much louder, which they have, but it doesn't bother me, in fact, I actually like it, but, to negate any future comments from the Minister for War and Finances I may look at some changes to the rear muffler set-up to drop the volume down a tad to appease her when we are out and about in it
    • You will need to extend the turbo inlet pipe somehow, which could/might be done with silicone/rubber pipe, but might need steelwork, depending on your intake. And you will need to change the pipework on the outlet in teh same way, but this is more likely to need steelwork.
×
×
  • Create New...