Jump to content
SAU Community

Anybody Out There Using Jjr Turbo Or Intake?

MissTara

By MissTara,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

MissTara Enthusiast

MissTara

Posted
Posted

Well, went and had a look around. seen Just Jap have forward facing intake plenums for the RB25DET. Just wondering if anybody on here bought one of these, and was it ok to install? Also looking at there JJR 330 or 430 Turbo's. Wondering if anybody on here has used them and if they like them or not. I'm not really interested if your mates mate has a sister who has a turbo and its shit. I want to know if you know somthing for fact, if you have used it yourself. cheers. :)

rev210 Grand Master

rev210

Posted
Posted

The factory side facing plenum is actually reasonable from a flow perspective. If you are looking at the cheap stuff my assumption is that you are on a budget. If this is the case give the whole forward facing plenum a complete miss as the return on the investment power wise is far better in plenty of other areas.

Better questiion to ask is what sort of equipement to go buy to achieve 'x' goal/s.

Think about what you like about the car now and also what you want to improve. Ultimately what you want to do with the car. There is huge amounts of experience on how to get a variety of setups right once you get this info sorted.

Hope that helps :)

MissTara Enthusiast

MissTara

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks Rev210. Ive only just came accross just jap, i see alot of there parts are pretty good. I know you always get what you pay for when you buy top end stuff, like a greddy plenum or Garrett Turbo, just people don't talk about the JJR Turbo much, Yeah im on a budget. just week to week upgrades sort of thing, Honestly i wouldnt get the forward plenum for responce.. mainly for a clean engine bay./less piping. Thankyou for the reply.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • welshy_32ZILA
      Welshys 32ZILA and the 8HP.

      By welshy_32ZILA · Posted

      I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • welshy_32ZILA
      Welshys 32ZILA and the 8HP.

      By welshy_32ZILA · Posted

      It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • PranK
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By PranK · Posted

      Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • GTSBoy
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Wazmond
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By Wazmond · Posted

      Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...