Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

I been looking around and reading about the best way to make a RB30DET by looking at other builds and info on this site etc, i have 3 questions where i am just stuck on as i don't have enough experience.

I know the R32 RB25DE non VCT will go straight on., But will the RB25DE with VCT go straight on as well? (bar the fact that you have to drill some things to the block etc for VCT to work)

To me with not much experience in making RB30s etc this seems like the RB25DE with VCT head Vs the R32 RB25 non VCT will be a lot more expensive is this true? as i wont be doing it myself.

and lastly is it worth the trouble to connect VCT? I am wanting to run twin turbo system on this and im not sure if VCT is even worth the fuss?

Thank you.

Edited by raZ1911
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/236685-rb30-pre-build-advice/
Share on other sites

VCT is good for a daily driver and most will say its worth the effort (its not hard to connect, just a simple oil feed)

If you running big cams and big turbos and arent worried about the down low repsonse and cant be bothered hooking it up thats fine, a few people that have done the conversion havent connected it and its fine, but if you were running stock cams i would definately hook it up.

The rb25de vct bolts straight up the same as the r32 rb25de head, you just have to block the oil feed on the bottom of the head on the vct head, its all in the rb30 pdf though

Yeah i want the whole down low response thats why i want the RB30 haha :down:

Yeah i read that RB30 pdf, was a good read. Just thought i would ask to be sure as i dont want to go out and buy a RB25DE VCT head then go damn its to much work.

So the RB25DE with VCT head goes straight on pretty much, just have to set up and drill a few spots for the VCT to make it run, other than that its the same as the R32 RB25de non VCT head from then on?

On the R32 25DE the cams are different (32 style to not suit VCT), the cas is different (again R32 vs R33), and you need to upgrade to GTR valve springs as the R32 25DE springs will start to give valve float with not a lot of boost.

On the R32 25DE the cams are different (32 style to not suit VCT), the cas is different (again R32 vs R33), and you need to upgrade to GTR valve springs as the R32 25DE springs will start to give valve float with not a lot of boost.

Not necessarily true, my R32 25DE head made 365rwkw @22psi in it's old car with no float whatsoever.. stock cams and springs ;)

Edited by bubba

it all depends on the car its going into...

R32-the R32 RB25DE head is the pick as its almost as simple as taking everything off your RB20DET and putting it on the RB30DET with no sensor etc etc changes

R33-then you'd obviously go the R33 RB25DE as you wouldn't need to change any sensors.

If you decide to put a 33 25de into a 32, you will need all the R33 RB25 sensors and the R33 RB25 ECU for the conversion to work....

the simple rule is:

Use the same ECU and sensors from or for the car you got your head from to make life easy

Price wise, you will pay more for an R32RB25DE head as they are rare as i got mine for 800, but a R33RB25DE would go for around 500

The R33 RB25DE also bolts straight on...bar the VCT work

Edited by R32Abuser

Yeah i have a RB20DET in the car at the moment. But i can sell / swap for RB25 parts that i need.

But if im doing it now i may as well do it right from the get go and keep VCT, as if i dont it would allways be on my mind.

As R32Abuser said about sensors and what not, Will keeping VCT make it more expensive to upgrade?

and is it true that you can use a remapped VG30DET ecu as it has VCT?

Keeping VCT will only make it more expensive due to tapping to feed, and needing an RB25DET ecu to run it rather than your RB20 ecu that you have which can be remapped. Whereas teh RB25DET ecu cannot or is more difficult. As you said you can get a VG30DET comp to run the 33 head, but at the end of the day id personally rather go with a PFC.

If its going in a car which had a RB20DET, go with the R32 RB25DE head...trust me it will cause you less headaches in the long run. VCT isnt that great in the scheme of things, and if you ever want to do cams you lose this ability anyway.

So if i dont go with the VCT head then im not missing out on much?

Because it seems like if i go with the R33 RB25de VCT head then i have to get the different set of side feed injectors, different ECU, sensors Loom, etc

Bit if i go R32 RB25DE then i can use loom, ECU, Manifold, exh manifold, sensors etc.

The only thing im worried about is low down power, Would i see much of a difference between a RB30 with VCT and without?

Im aiming for around 400 hp to 500 hp max, So would i most likely have to get cams in there anyway to achieve this so would going to all the bother of getting the R33 head on there be pointless?

more or less going with the 33 head is pointless in a 32 unless you cant find a 32 RB25DE....

for example, Cubes makes 308kw with a GT30R, which gets full boost all in before 3000RPM i believe and a set of cams (you'll have to check with him on specs)...which is around the 420hp range. This is with a 32 RB25de from a R32. You would reach this power level without cams however you would require a larger turbo or larger A/R on a GT30 to push the appropriate flow, which lessens your low down response and is more ideal for higher end RPM power-something you don't want.

As what has been said, go with the R32 RB25DE. Its easier to fit in the car, and the small (read very small) gain to be had from using vct, is not worth the hassles you would have to go through to fit it in a 32/ceffy.

Edited by R32Abuser

Yeah i think i will just go with the R32 RB25DE head.

I created a list of everything i need, does this seem right:

1. RB25DE (R32) Head

2. GTR valve springs

3. Head Gasket

4. Inlet Manifold and Plenum (RB20DET)

5. grind down the water galleys protruding lumps that run from the front to the rear of the block.

6. Short Motor (RB30E Series 2)

7. RB30E Pistons (~8.2:1 CR)

8. Prepped stock rods

9. full length crank collar installed

10. Engine Bearings, (Genuine Nissan Bearings or better?)

11. Oil Pump RB20DET

12. Water pump & Thermostat (RB20DET)

13. Power steer bracket grind the lug flat so the bracket is able to sit flat on the block.

14. Use a longer piece of oil resistant hose for the oil drain pipe, you will also be required to bend and stretch the oil and water lines to meet with the turbo.

15. Gearbox RB25 Series 2

16. Relocate 33mm of tensioner studd

17. Cam Belt

3. not just the head gasket you will need all the new gaskets.

7. if you do go with forged pistons there are many options available however the CP 9.0:1 CR pistons are the normal recommendation.

8. for the price of prepped stock rods seriously consider the spool imports forged rods as they are not that expensive - see user spoolup on these forums

11. use an RB26 item or jun/tomei if the budget allows.

12. use a standard RB26 item.

14. if possible use a mostly metal oil return, the rubber/silicone drys out and cracks after a while due to the heat.

Yeah I wouldn't bother with prepping the stock rods, I am chasing a lowly power figure (300rwkw) for now which should be well within the realm of possibility for my stock RB30 rods. When I decide to chase more I'll be going for a set of Spool rods (and maybe even a stroker crank :banana:).

stroker sounds nice! :thumbsup:

So ill take out the prepping the stock rods i can do that later with more power.

For what would i need just to get the thing running and in the car without anything fancy does this sound right:

1. RB30E S2 block

2. R32 RB25DE head

3.Head Gasket (But what one just to get it running?)

4. Inlet Manifold and Plenum (RB20DET)

5. grind down the water galleys

6. stock RB30E Pistons (so for now the CR will be decent)

7. full length crank collar installed (do i need to do this?)

8. Engine Bearings

9. Oil Pump RB20DET (just to get it on the road)

10. Water pump & Thermostat (RB20DET) (just to get it on the road)

11. Power steering bracket

12. "Use a longer piece of oil resistant hose for the oil drain pipe" - will i have to do this with a stock RB25 turbo?

13. Relocate 33mm of tensioner studd and Cam Belt

14. RB20DET ECU - remapped

And that should get it running so i can drive it around for the time being (i wouldn't be driving it hard.)

I'm just running a new RB20 headgasket.

That will get you around driving, I drove mine for a few months on an ecu chip from a groupbuy (basically just had airflow cut and speed cut removed).

That said, you WILL max your airflow meter.. I maxed mine pretty quickly so when I went for a tune I threw a z32 afm and some 550cc injectors in there to make the most of the tune cost.

Yeah i have a Mines ECU in the RB20 at the moment.

But i think its best if i get some GTR injectors (when using the R32 RB25DE head?) and a AFM and tune it wit the stock ECU (not myself obviously)

The car I have is a 180sx with a RB20DET with a RB20DET box behind it, now i know its ok for the 20 box to go with the RB25 as its a lighter car than a 33 and such, BUT how long do you think it will last with the RB30?

Will it be ok seeing as though it is in a 180sx? (only for a short amount of time.)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...