Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 374
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Awesome result!.

Sorry if I missed it earlier Trent, but what sort of AFR's was it running?

kinda like to keep that under wraps (like engine specifics and headwork etc) but leaner than the average tune i see come in.

Edited by URAS

Great peek whp result, I can't imagine what that would be like in 2wd with it as laggy as it is then having so much come in so quick, I can't see that car having alot of traction! lol.

If that engine was in a GTR what whp in 4wd do you think it would make around about?

I have a graph here of 850awhp at 7500rpm in 4wd at 1.9 bar on 98 pump gas done with a GT42 but it comes in sooner and less agressivley, be interested to compare results based on what you thihk that motor would have made in 4wd, do you have any numbers at 1.9 bar? and how much is "a touch over 2 bar"?.

Be interesting to see what it would do on the strip with some decent tyres too.

Rob

around 13.0:1

im serious

I know the Max NOS likes to be lean but it starts lean (when swapping from pump on the same map) and needs more duty on the injector to make it back to the same AFR. That's why I asked about the base fuel pressure cos the spec list says it only has 1000cc injectors in it.

It might be something to do with how dynapack HP translates into DD horsepower - I don't know.

this is a daily driver and response was more important.

Just throwing a question out to everyone - especially URAS - keen to know if people think this goal was actually achieved? I'm aware everyone will have differing views on "responsiveness" but given the graph & stats stated so far, I think it can be a YES / NO answer.

Most importantly, is the owner happy? Or does he/she want more?

I know the Max NOS likes to be lean but it starts lean (when swapping from pump on the same map) and needs more duty on the injector to make it back to the same AFR. That's why I asked about the base fuel pressure cos the spec list says it only has 1000cc injectors in it.

It might be something to do with how dynapack HP translates into DD horsepower - I don't know.

Thanks for giving the game away :banana:

I know the Max NOS likes to be lean but it starts lean (when swapping from pump on the same map) and needs more duty on the injector to make it back to the same AFR. That's why I asked about the base fuel pressure cos the spec list says it only has 1000cc injectors in it.

It might be something to do with how dynapack HP translates into DD horsepower - I don't know.

injector duty (btw i guessed 1000cc, i just looked at the color) was a concern during final runs and ultimately determined peak power (base pressure is also something i would like to leave unsaid) but it was an area well and sorted. All this stuff is really unimportant but anyway...cause at the end of the day it is only a figure but previous heavy hitters running in the 550-700rwkw range on my dyno went on to run nearly 150rwkw more on a dyno dynamics dyno on the westside of melbourne in a dyno comp in dd shootout mode (preparations for the next summer nats) so im pretty confident that the car makes between 950 and 1050 genuine horsepower... as ive said previous any doubters are more than welcome to bring thier cars down and run them up on the dyno for free (providing they make decent numbers, as my time is money) and they can see for themselves.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the replies and suggestions. Got the seats out (hoping I could find some existing grommets but no such luck). By tapping and measuring etc. I could figure out where I could drill through if needed. But first I borrowed an inspection camera and managed to go through factory holes in the chassis rail and could see that the captive nut was holding steady which is why it could retighten. So it was indeed a stripped section of thread, so I applied downforce by levering the bolt head with a screwdriver and went slowly back and forth until it came out. Camera helped a lot cos I could monitor that the captive nut was holding tight. Now I just have one very seized main subframe nut to tackle 😅
    • BOVs do have a purpose, if you ever log pressure before and after the throttle body, you will see a spike pre throttle on lift off from a WOT condition. Enough to bend throttle blades / damage e-throttle motors or simple assist in blowing off cooler pipes. FWIW, the above on really applies to those running at least 2 bar of boost. OP shouldn't have an issue, on the other hand, here are some videos of my shit box over a decade ago with some succulent dose with the airbox on and off. That shit box is unrecognisable these days 🫠    
    • I've tried all different combinations of BOVs/ no BOV and stock bypass valves over the years, on gear changes the stock bypass valve seems to get the car back on boost quicker because in part the turbos wheel speed isn't being slowed down by reversion, although they have issues holding boost much over the stock setting. Most aftermarket BOVs you can adjust the spring, tighter will make it open later and close sooner, but in my experience it'll cause a bit of flutter at low load/rpm anyway. I've also got some input into this whole no bov causing turbo wear, never had an issue on any on my turbos HOWEVER, I got my R33 GTST with 200k kms on it, with from what I can see still has the original turbo, no lateral shaft play but has about 4-5mm of play in and out which to me seems like a worn thrust bearing from years (100-150k kms?) of turbo flutter running no bov, so maybe there is some truth to it in the long run. But that'll never stop me loving the Stutututu while I have the car.   OP just wants to know if he can run a atmo vented BOV with no major issues and the answer is YES, plenty of people do it, there's no harm in installing it and seeing how it runs before spending $$$ on an aftermarket ecu, last time I bought a Nistune it was $2400 for install and a tune , unsure of todays prices but you get me. Crazy money to spend just to fix the minor inconvenience of stalling that can be overcome by letting the revs come down to near idle before putting the clutch in or a little bit of throttle to avoid it. You're better off leaving the ecu and tune for after a bigger turbo/injectors have been installed to take full advantage of the tune and get your moneys worth.   Let OP have his Whoosh sound without trying to break his bank haha
    • I see you missed the rest of the conversation where they have benefits, but nothing to do with avoiding breaking turbos, which is what the aftermarket BOV made all the fan boys, tuners, and modders believe was the only purpose for them...
    • But they do so for the other reasons to have a compressor bypass. It's in the name.
×
×
  • Create New...