Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

has any1 modded or purchesed a custom plemun or modded there existing plenum that actually looks anygood

i have seen modded and custom plenums but im not happy with the look of em.

i would like to mod the existing 1 preferably.

any 1 that has done it or no anything good and bad bout it, info would be much appreciated

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Rb20_4valve

i would like to mod the existing 1 preferably.

that's bad news

they're designed the way they are in order to capture/disperse the air equally

when you move the inlet to the front (I take it this is what you mean?) then you aren't getting equal quantities of air into each cylinder

best way to go if you have to mod your plenum is get some engineered plenum (with the scoops etc) like a sub zero one, or get a brand name one as they've done the work already and have proven results (as far as I'm aware anyway!)

I'd jsut stay with the stock one and increase the tb size, as I read somewhere the other day they have better torque producing figures than the gtr plenum at high revs/boost

Although at the same time I could be talking bs, but that's what I remember

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-509561
Share on other sites

My mate can make a custom plenum on the existing intake runners. Looks very nice, and some of the cars running them have made 400rwhp+, so they work aswell. If you want details then PM me.

I agree that the cut and shut plenums seem like a bad idea, but I have seen a few that still seem to make good power.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-509607
Share on other sites

Originally posted by PSIKO

that's bad news

they're designed the way they are in order to capture/disperse the air equally

when you move the inlet to the front (I take it this is what you mean?) then you aren't getting equal quantities of air into each cylinder

The stock plenum has had sweet bugger all engineering into dispersing air evenly. It may do, somewhat, but thats more a matter orf course than design. Nissan's target was to lower the cost of ic piping and shorten its route. That they suceeded at, at the cost of an undersized 'cooler, but even air disperstion was not at the top of their list.

I should take pictures of the stock one I have lying around here. The throttle body is positioned such that it blasts air right down the neck of cylinder 3 and 4. No deflectors or trick engineering gone into it at all. I'd be willing to wager that cylinder 3 and 4 running lean is the cause for a substantional number of rebuilds.

Properly done, a cut'n'shut should have no problems out doing the stock plenums job, just have to take it to someone who has experience with it. If you're still sceptical, consider the number of oem plenums that are front facing log-on-top-of-runner styles: ca18det, sr20det, 4g63, 1jz and 2jz. All very similar to what a cut'n'shut ends up being (especially the last two).

The proof is in the works though and Steve-SST has given mine a thumbs up, so it'll interesting to see how it'll fair.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-511560
Share on other sites

how much for the rb25 tb's? will need one soon for a custom plenum, making it myself with the help of a fabricator so will see how it goes, shoudl save me the 600 he normally charges for this sorta work

also does using a larger tb require aftermarket manangemnt or can i use the safc to clean up the mixtures...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516480
Share on other sites

DCIEVE, I was going to sell it for $60 on another forum but you can have a SAU discount :). $50. Pic here.

As long as you can mate your current throttle position sensor onto the new throttle body, you shouldn't have many problems with the ecu recognizing the tb. Fueling might be an issue though and a s-afc won't be as good as a remap.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516489
Share on other sites

Originally posted by Gradenko

I should take pictures of the stock one I have lying around here.

In reply to myself, I finally got a pic taken. Not all that clear though. I was holding the plenum "steady" and the half a dozen beers I had before hand had some say in that.

Thats looking down the throttle mounting plate. The light you can see through there is coming in the through the entrance for runner 3 & 4, which is just off the top of the frame. So what happens to air thats blasting in there at 1-odd bar? Some of it hits the runner divider and scatters, but the rest, the majority, takes the path of least resistance to low pressure goodness and ends up in cylinder 3 and 4.

Horrible design.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/23809-rb-custom-plenums/#findComment-516500
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • But we haven't even gotten to the point of talking about stateless controllers or any of the good stuff yet!
    • You guys need to take this discussion to another thread if you want to continue it, most of the last 2 pages has nothing to do with OP's questions and situation
    • And this, is just ONE major issue for closed loop control, particularly using PID. One such issue that is created right here, is integrator wind up. But you know GTSBoy, "it's just a simple PID controller"...  
    • Nah. For something like boost control I wouldn't start my design with PID. I'd go with something that originates in the fuzzy logic world and use an emergency function or similar concept. PID can and does work, but at its fundamental level it is not suited to quick action. I'd be reasonably sure that the Profecs et al all transitioned to a fuzzy algorithm back in the 90s. Keep in mind also that where and when I have previously talked about using a Profec, I'm usually talking about only doing an open loop system anyway. All this talk of PID and other algorithms only comes into play when you're talking closed loop boost control, and in the context of what the OP needs and wants, we're probably actually in the realm of open loop anyway. Closed loop boost control has always bothered me, because if you sense the process value (ie the boost measurement that you want to control) in the plenum (after the throttle), then boost control to achieve a target is only desirable at WOT. When you are not WOT, you do not want the the boost to be as high as it can be (ie 100% of target). That's why you do not have the throttle at WO. You're attempting to not go as fast as you can. If the process variable is measured upstream of the throttle (ie in an RB26 plenum, or the cold side pipework in others) then yeah, sure, run the boost controller closed loop to hit a target boost there, and then the throttle does what it is supposed to do. Just for utter clarity.... an old Profec B Spec II (or whatever it is called, and I've got one, and I never look at it, so I can't remember!) and similar might have a MAP sensor, and it might show you the actual boost in the plenum (when the MAP sensor is connected to the plenum) but it does not use that value to decide what it is doing to control the boost, except to control the gating effect (where it stops holding the gate closed on the boost ramp). It's not closed loop at all. Once the gate is released, it's just the solenoid flailing away at whatever duty cycle was configured when it was set up. I'm sure that there are many people who do not understand the above points and wonder wtf is going on.  
    • This has clearly gone off on quite a tangent but the suggestion was "go standalone because you probably aren't going to stop at just exhaust + a mild tune and manual boost controller", not "buy a standalone purely for a boost controller". If the scope does in fact stop creeping at an EBC then sure, buy an EVC7 or Profec or whatever else people like to run and stop there. And I have yet to see any kind of aftermarket boost control that is more complicated than a PID controller with some accounting for edge cases. Control system theory is an incredibly vast field yet somehow we always end up back at some variant of a PID controller, maybe with some work done to linearize things. I have done quite a lot, but I don't care to indulge in those pissing matches, hence posting primary sources. I deal with people quite frequently that scream and shout about how their opinion matters more because they've shipped more x or y, it doesn't change the reality of the data they're trying to disagree with. Arguing that the source material is wrong is an entirely separate point and while my experience obviously doesn't matter here I've rarely seen factory service manuals be incorrect about something. It's not some random poorly documented internal software tool that is constantly being patched to barely work. It's also not that hard to just read the Japanese and double check translations either. Especially in automotive parts most of it is loanwords anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...