Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, don't post on here much (if at all), but i hope u can still help. I searched, i didn't find.

Didnt know if this should go in forced induction or n/a forum, since its got aspects of both... There should be an electrical/ecu subforum.

Basically, my friend has gone and purchased pretty much everything he needs to turbocharge his n/a S1 R33 (1993) off these forums (bar dump pipe, which he is getting tomorrow). We swapped the injectors and ecu over and now his car wont start. Everything is connected the way it was before and it doesn't sound like the fuel pump is priming, so that would be my first guess.

All the turbo parts (bar intercooler piping, which isn't attached) are off the same car, which was running at the time the parts were removed but I'm not sure if the car was an S1 or an S2.

So, basically, is there any reason why a S1 RB25DE R33 running just the ecu and injectors from a RB25DET R33 wont start, remembering it may possibly be s2 ecu? Is there any wiring/control differences in the fuel pump/ecu circuits, or could the ecu just be a dud?

Only mods to his car are pod filter, exhaust, steering wheel, rims and springs, so none of these should be making the difference.

EDIT: He got the turbo bits off "R34GTFOUR" so if you could reply stating if S1 or S2, I was the one who said I would be putting it together :P

Edited by Mitchd03

The pump should still work, the only difference is a relay for upping the voltage to it under load, that doesn't come into effect at idle.

Where is the AFM hooked up? You need a closed system so the air goes through it and gives a reference voltage for the ECU.

Also has he got the turbo fuel pump fitted? He'll run into dramas with it leaning out if it's not already in.

Yep grab a GTSt pump and fuel regulator (or did you get the complete injectors and rail?) if you can...but saying that, your car isn't starting for another reason....as it will still idle on a GTS pump just fine

Well all we did last night was remove fuel rail and insert the new GTST injectors and then plug in the GTST Ecu, is it possible we need to reset the settings by unconnecting the battery? Could it also be something to do with a fuse?

Ok, it starts and idles now, but it blows light grey smoke, and misfires. Smells like there's no catalytic converter.

Could this be wrong fuel pressure for the turbo ecu? If so, what is the correct fuel pressure, as we are using an N/A fuel press reg.

Remember, its an RB25DE with T injectors and ecu.

EDIT: Just took it for a drive and its definitely running way too rich, the cat light came on when taking it to higher (4-5k) revs, huge exhaust pops when shifting gears, hunting for idle etc. but the misfiring got better (wasn't cured) at higher rpm (around 3)

Stuck injector? Wrong fuel pressure? Fuel pump? (remember, NO BOOST, its still an n/a, no more air than before, therefore no more fuel needed, so pump should be capable for now)

Edited by Kyro

why are you installing injectors before the turbo.... the ecu is tuned to run the injectors with the forced induction, all the problems you have are the sign of over fueling, if you's keep running it u'll burn out the cat (thats why the light is coming on, it's getting to hot), install all the components needed Turbo, intercooler, pump, FPR...

why are you installing injectors before the turbo.... the ecu is tuned to run the injectors with the forced induction, all the problems you have are the sign of over fueling, if you's keep running it u'll burn out the cat (thats why the light is coming on, it's getting to hot), install all the components needed Turbo, intercooler, pump, FPR...

The ecu adds fuel as the AFM reads more air, if the ecu just smashed more fuel in all the time, the car would be rich (like this) when not under boost, then stoich when boost hit

You can have a turbocharged car with ecu and injectors designed to run boost, remove the turbo and it will run fine.

I know this is true, i've done it twice. One time to my ford Telstar TX5 turbo. It uses an air flow meter, just like nissan use. The only difference is the tx5 has one massive injector instead of smaller ones on each cylinder (like a carbie). The turbo blew an oil seal, i pulled turbo out, reconnected the afm and it runs fine, its just really slow and loud.

The second time to my z31 300zx. It was a VG30E, naturally aspirated. I had turbo injectors and a turbo ecu lying around, waiting to get a turbo. I had to pull the intake manifold off, so i changed injectors and ecu at the same time. The car runs exactly the same as it did before (misfiring, a little rich, hunts at idle, backfiring on overrun, it's always done this, its an '84 model car). Old injectors were ~180cc, new ones are 269cc (they sound tiny i know, but higher fuel pressure than RB25DE) and the ecu is calibrated to those injectors. We did exactly what i did to the zed, yet i got a completely different result, and my assumption was the fuel pressure regulator, as with the RB swap we kept the n/a fuel pressure reg, but on my VG30E I swapped the regulator with the turbo one (as i got a complete rail).

And now that an N/A ecu is running bigger Turbo injectors, when the turbo ecu couldn't run them... it doesn't make sense. If you put big injectors in the car goes really rich, anyone who has tuned a car should know this. You then have to shorten the injector times to get it to run stoich again, which is what the turbo ecu does.

Bah!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
    • Does it make a difference in your turbo having a shorter life if you have a cat converter as it causes that back pressure versus less/no back pressure with a decat? (Not sure if this is accurate) Also slightly different question if you went from a oem cat to a decat or vice versa will it require a tune? I heard if you change the dump pipe onwards it requires a tune?
    • No. Have only gotten as far as contemplating the task of having to put in the required fairly heavy wiring and fusing to run it (along with the big alternator), and preferring not to. But otherwise, it would be nice to have a little extra freedom as to exactly where the compressor is located and free up some space around the exhaust side of the engine.
    • Following from this in a related by not closely-related sense... Because I was buying a bunch of other GKTech stuff, I got some rear subframe collars. The history that leads up to this is: 25+ years ago the car arrived into the country with stock subframe bushes. At some point shortly thereafter I added Whiteline pineapple rings, set up neutral, and it improved the rear end behaviour. Well, it is my vague memory that I was happier with it with them in. Less axle tramp on launches, generally better, etc etc. ~2012 it got a new non-HICAS subframe with new stock bushes. No pineapple rings. I reckon that ever since then I've been dissatisfied with the axle tramp. Recently I've been f**king around a lot with all aspects of the suspension. One contemplation has been to relocate the rear lower control arm front mount points (and do the other things needed to make that work) to improve longitudinal rear grip by getting rid of some of the stupid anti-squat that Nissan ladled into the R32. But.... before doing that I thought I'd put some collars in. And.... The collars are good. The rear sounds a little bit different, but there has been no significant increase in NVH coming up into the body. In terms of rear behaviour - expansion joints on long sweeping elevated freeway ramps that would sometimes cause the rear to jiggle around a bit, no longer seem to do so. It appears that jamming chunks of metal into the gaps in the rubber so they can't move much is a really good thing. And the launch behaviour and general forward traction situation seems to be greatly improved too. It's impossible to be really sure, because the tyres are completely shagged - they are freakishly willing to let go right now. But as an A-B test with the same tyres it certainly seems to grip up a lot better. Highly recommended to anyone who still has stock bushes.
×
×
  • Create New...