Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Ive owned both and the 350 wins hands down in terms of build quality, handling and looks. Although a GTT can be modded cheaply for more power. A 350 you need to spend serious dollars to get the car going

The 350 does have very limited boot space but we still managed to go away on holidays with adequate luggage. You just need to improvise with the space available.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4176444
Share on other sites

:D guys u aint helpin, its 50 /50 at this stage. And no not looking into GTR, just standard turbo. well its turbo or no turbo? or 4 seats or 2 seats?.....dunno what do go 4? 350z does look abit classier have to say. but ive seen some r34 that wuld shit all over a 350z. boot space im not 2 fuss about, i mean once u load up the subs into the boot of the r34 then u pretty much got the same space as a 350z. does the SAU club accept 350z with open arms?? :) if i did go 4 the 350z cruizing with the crew wouldnt blend in. :D lol. helppppp
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4177680
Share on other sites

its abit of a price difference, ive driven both and they both completely different, r34 is way more practical, and at the moment i see the 350z as a midlife crisis car and abit of a chicks car, look around and most people driving them are midlife crises people and older women..... not to say the 350z isnt an awesome car.... but most people expect to see a stereotype in them (well me anyway). An r34 has character, 350z looks like a girls skyline lol. Also r34 is cheaper, more parts available, if you need to carry more than 2 people it will do it easy and an r34 will loose allot less value than a 350z will....

if i had the money i'd go the new GTR and for the same price as a 350z i'd go a gtr R34 hands down, no questions asked

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4177827
Share on other sites

but most people expect to see a stereotype in them (well me anyway).

The same goes with a skyline driver, only less midlife/girl and more 'backwards cap wearing, wacko, doof doof hoon'

Also r34 is cheaper, more parts available, if you need to carry more than 2 people it will do it easy and an r34 will loose allot less value than a 350z will....

I wouldn't be too sure on that one, look at the values of 33 gtst's now, as compared to what they were five to six years ago. 34's will go the same way. In that timeframe a Z will still have a lot of value on it.

Go the Z imo, 34's are tough, but it's not a match for a Z. Good performance from stock, it'll still hold value, and it will give you the peace of mind you'll never get from an import (genuine k's, service history, you can take it to ANY nissan dealer and get it serviced, rather than having to go to a select few workshops in major cities). Not to mention, they have a bit of menace about them to begin with.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4178003
Share on other sites

....you can take it to ANY nissan dealer and get it serviced, rather than having to go to a select few workshops in major cities).....

sorry i don't agree. there are more competant import workshops than nissan dealers in sydney.

not to mention nissan though it was OK to leave or z without a radio for 3 months when we had a warranty problem. yeah, thats the sort of top shelf service you can expect from nissan.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4178055
Share on other sites

:blink: guys u aint helpin, its 50 /50 at this stage. And no not looking into GTR, just standard turbo. well its turbo or no turbo? or 4 seats or 2 seats?.....dunno what do go 4? 350z does look abit classier have to say. but ive seen some r34 that wuld shit all over a 350z. boot space im not 2 fuss about, i mean once u load up the subs into the boot of the r34 then u pretty much got the same space as a 350z. does the SAU club accept 350z with open arms?? :) if i did go 4 the 350z cruizing with the crew wouldnt blend in. :O lol. helppppp

You havent stated what you want the car for, looks? space? power? tuneability?, what do u want to do with it?

as stated there is a significant price difference, for a really nice 350 track your probably pushing the 45-50k mark, for that price you could get a decent 34gtr, which would be a lot closer in specs than the gtt would be to the 350,

the gtt you could pick up for 17-25k depending on the level of modification, the 350 starts off at a high price.

If you want to be able to take people in the back seat, the gtt can accomodate you, not very well as the rear is quite cramped but the seats are there whereas they are not in the 350, same with boot space.

the 350 is a newer car, so chances are, the ones floating around are in a better condition than a car that is now up to 10 years old, thats not to say that you cant find some nice gtt's with good k's and in great condition,

The point is, everyone on here is going to give you their own opinion, and like it or not, it will be based off what they would use the particular car for, some people like 33's, some people think they're barges... (no offence to 33 owners, i like them but there are people who will say this) it is all a difference of opinion.

FACTS:

350z will cost between - 40-50k for the track model depending on k's and condition

34gtt will cost between - 17-25k, maybe more for highly modded ones which ill assume you probably dont want

350z - is a much newer car, starting production in around 2003

34gtt - older car that started production in 98

350z - 287kw +- at the flywheel

34gtt - 206kw +- at the flywheel

350z - as stated, takes more $$ to push out large figures

34gtt - has a lot of bolt on support to quickly increase power at a low cost

Just a few things to think about, at the end of the day, just think about what you want to use the car for and consider some of the above

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4178090
Share on other sites

The average 2003 model 350Z does not cost 40-45k anymore. Try 30 to 37, depending on condition, kms, colour.

true, but the majority of the track models that fit into that price range are,

(A) 03-04 models

(B) have above 80k on the clock

Just depends how high u want your k's and what year/how new you want the car

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4178652
Share on other sites

The same goes with a skyline driver, only less midlife/girl and more 'backwards cap wearing, wacko, doof doof hoon'

I wouldn't be too sure on that one, look at the values of 33 gtst's now, as compared to what they were five to six years ago. 34's will go the same way. In that timeframe a Z will still have a lot of value on it.

Go the Z imo, 34's are tough, but it's not a match for a Z. Good performance from stock, it'll still hold value, and it will give you the peace of mind you'll never get from an import (genuine k's, service history, you can take it to ANY nissan dealer and get it serviced, rather than having to go to a select few workshops in major cities). Not to mention, they have a bit of menace about them to begin with.

nope nope i very VERY strongly dissagree. I don't know where you been looking at but a 2003 350z cost about $75k brand new drive away right? 70 if you want the basic one.... have a look around now and a 2003 350z can be picked up from $26k drive away from a few places includeing the net and the trading post in australia. I'm looking at an old HPI magazine atmo and in 2003 the average price for a manual r34 gtt was $35-40k, it's now 5 years on for both cars and the average sale price of a gtt is alittle over $20k with the cheapest being about $16k for a very battered one. In that 5 year span I would have ratherd lost $15-20K with a gtt rather than around about $40k in 5 years.

The 350z will do similar to a 300z in the same time frame excludeing the convertible model which will hold it's value alittle better.

If we look at the r33gtst the ones selling 5 years ago for 20K (series 2's) are still around $12-16K i think thats pretty good for 5 years. (don't look at the shit box thrashed ones that some lebbo has killed and thrown stolen parts into it and can afford to sell it for $8k)

they all loose money but everyone knows a private import holds value allot better because the importers keep the prices up.

we all know just about every import has dodgey k's on them, your kidding yourself if you think australian deliverd cars are any better???? ive seen cars being driven around often and only do 3000km a year.... being serviced them selves, winding the clock back 8000km ever 10000km. And if its a digital tacho its even easier to wind them back.

you could take the 350z to any nissan dealer but you will endup owning a complete new car with the money you would have spent taking a 350z to nissan and there are allot better qualified mechanics that look after skylines as a specialty that see skylines every day in there life..... a nissan mechanic will see a 350 once a week if there lucky and more people know skylines than 350z, allot of r34 parts are interchangeable with silvias, VL commodores, EL falcons, Nissan maximas. the 350z is completely different and the only real parts alternative is a r35 skyline or your left testicle from nissan lol

the only thing your right is an r34 will attract more attention from the cops, and there are more hoon steryotypes with a skyline, but if your not a wank on the public roads this isn't an issue.

the 350z is better for certain things but depends what you want it for....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/238993-r34-gtt-or-350z/#findComment-4178765
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, all the crude is used for fuels and petrochem feedstocks (pesticides, many other chemicals, etc etc). But increasingly over the last few decades, much of the petrochem synthessis has started with methane because NG has been cheaper than oil, cleaner and easier and more consistent to work with, etc etc etc. So it's really had to say what the fraction either way is. Suffice to say - the direct fuels fraction is not insigificant. Heavy transport uses excruciatingly large amounts. Diesel is wasted in jet heaters in North American garages and workshops, thrown down drill holes in quarries, pissed all over the wall to provide electricity to certain outback communities, etc etc. Obviously road transport, and our pet project, recreational consumption camouflaged as road transport, is a smaller fraction of the total liquid HC consumption again. If you're talking aboust Aussie cars' contribution to the absolute total CO2 production of the country, then of course our share of the cubic mile of coal that is used for power generation, metallurgy, etc adds up to a big chunk. Then there is the consumption of timber. Did you know that the production of silicon metal, for example, is done in Australia by using hardwood? And f**king lots and lots and lots of hardwood at that. Until recently, it was f**king jarrah! There are many such sneaky contributors to CO2 production in industry and farming. NG is used in massive quantities in Australia, for power gen, for running huge water pumps (like, 1-2MW sized caterpillar V16 engines running flat out pumping water) for places like mine sites and minerals/metals refineries. And there are just a huge number of those sort of things going on quietly in the background. So NG use is a big fraction of total CO2 production here. I mean, shit, I personally design burners that are used in furnaces here in Oz that use multiple MW of gas all day every day. The largest such that I've done (not here in Oz) was rated to 150MW. One. Single. Gas burner. In a cement clinker kiln. There are thousands of such things out there in the world. There are double digits of them just here in Oz. (OK< just barely double digits now that a lot of them have shut - and they are all <100MW). But it's all the same to me. People in the car world (like this forum's users) would like to think that you only have to create an industrial capability to replace the fuel that they will be using in 10 years time, and imagine that everyone else will be driving EVs. And while the latter part of that is largely true, the liquid HC fuel industry as a whole is so much more massive than the bit used for cars, that there will be no commercial pressure to produce "renewable" "synthetic" fuels just for cars, when 100x that much would still be being burnt straight from the well. You have to replace it all, or you're not doing what is required. And then you get back to my massive numbers. People don't handle massive numbers at all well. Once you get past about 7 or 8 zeros, it becomes meaningless for most people.
    • @GTSBoy out of the cubic mile of crude oil we burn each year, I wonder how much of that is actually used for providing petrol and diesel.   From memory the figure for cars in Australia, is that they only add up to about 2 to 3% of our CO2 production. Which means something else here is burning a shit tonne of stuff to make CO2, and we're not really straight up burning oil everywhere, so our CO2 production is coming from elsewhere too.   Also we should totally just run thermal energy from deep in the ground. That way we can start to cool the inside of the planet and reverse global warming (PS, this last paragraph is a total piss take)
    • As somebody who works in the energy sector and lives in a subzero climate, i'm convinced EV's will never be the bulk of our transport.  EV battery and vehicle companies over here have been going bankrupt on a weekly basis the last year. 
    • With all the rust on those R32s, how can it even support all the extra weight requirements. Probably end up handling as well as a 1990s Ford Falcon Taxi.
    • Yes...but look at the numbers. There is a tiny tiny fraction of the number of Joules available, compared to what is used/needed. Just because things are "possible" doesn't make them meaningful.
×
×
  • Create New...