Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey, im about to set my ring gap on my rb25 and would like some opinions from you guys. im using cp's with 40 thou over pistons. cp reccommend bore x 0.0065/0.007 for top ring, bore x 0.007/0.008 for 2nd and min. of 0.015 for oil.

my bore is 3.425'' so top works out at 0.023, 2nd at 0.0274.

is this suitable or is should i be running something smaller. thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/
Share on other sites

umm, id take 5 thou of that. for both. there gaps are a little big for a street motor.. somwhere around 15 and 18 is fine.

correct...the ring gaps quoted by Elite are excessive to say the least.

i wont quote what ring gaps i use but some where around or near to whats quoted above

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4179720
Share on other sites

correct...the ring gaps quoted by Elite are excessive to say the least.

i wont quote what ring gaps i use but some where around or near to whats quoted above

Great! so now you know more than the piston manufacturer. Congratulations.

I just hope this guy has the good sense to not listen to your comment and instead listen to the people who make the piston and rings.

But hey, I could be wrong. While you're at it, give him your rule of thumb on piston to bore clearances. We wouldn't want him making the mistake of using the piston manufacturers specs on that one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180288
Share on other sites

Run them where you/he likes...its your/his engine

ask my customers have they ever had a problem with an excessive breathing rattly engine when using CP pistons.

my piston to bore clearances are none of your business...i don't want to give you any more free advice. :banana:

Yeah nice.

But when he cranks the boost up and binds the ring ends because you told him to run 17thou, how are you going to explain that to this guy. If you don't follow the instructions made by the manufacturer then you are asking for problems. Or do you just choose the information you adhere to or not? I don't really care what piston to bore clearance you run and I certainly don't need your advice. I just think you need to think about the consequences of giving advice like that in a place like this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180313
Share on other sites

Great! so now you know more than the piston manufacturer. Congratulations.

I just hope this guy has the good sense to not listen to your comment and instead listen to the people who make the piston and rings.

But hey, I could be wrong. While you're at it, give him your rule of thumb on piston to bore clearances. We wouldn't want him making the mistake of using the piston manufacturers specs on that one.

Run them where you/he likes...its your/his engine

ask my customers have they ever had a problem with an excessive breathing rattly engines when using CP pistons.

my piston to bore clearances are none of your business...i don't want to give you any more free advice. :banana:

Edited by DiRTgarage
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180305
Share on other sites

....and I wouldn't call 28thou excessive in a 3.425 inch bore. People cringed when engine builders started running closer to 3thou BE clearances but it was all for a reason. Ring technology these days is that far advanced from the 90's. You don't need to run tighter end gaps to keep it sealed.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180324
Share on other sites

After seeing how well my engine stood up to the work i put it through before the clutch explosion, I am not arguing with 3lit3 32. I dragged it, raced it, and generally did all you can do in a high performance car. On teardown the piston.s rings. and bore.s were still like new. He built it and is building the replacement and i wouldnt have it any other way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180325
Share on other sites

ive already done them to elites spec. and yeah its also what cp reccommend so cant be too wrong. just wanted to double check. last thing i want is the rings binding. and yeah it is turbo (garrett t04z), planning on running high boost. street car but will be seeing the track a fair bit! thanks again.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239144-cp-ring-gap/#findComment-4180842
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Dunno what to tell you, when I look at it on Consult I can see this warmup timing map kicking in around 40C coolant temp and it sticks around for a while:  At part throttle on the normal base timing map it peaks around ~43 degrees of timing or something like that, this warmup timing map drops it to like 12-15 degrees. 
    • I don't think that's what you're seeing. Something else doing that. The only time I've seen it get so retarded is when it's trying to control idle (in which case we're not talking about mapped timing tagets anyway) and when there is an extreme coolant temperature sensor fault. The RB26 ECU is essentially the same as the 20 ECU and I knew that ging inside out. There is no facility for it to retard that heavily on cold start. The OEMs never used to do it back then. I mean, shit, the catalyst is abotu 3 miles down the exhaust anyway. Early light-off was just a twinkle in some EPA arsehole's eye back then, not a regular engine control strategy.
    • I must preface my comments with a general expression of ignorance. I have no specific knowledge of these NA automtaic things. I can only assume that the "steering wheel button" is for enabling the tiptronic controls. Wierd that it would even need/want a button for that... But anyway.... Was the car previously tiptronic? Did you put a new cluster in as part of all this?
    • Regardless, it doesn't seem wise especially on RBs to actually chase MBT. Timing scatter is the big one on stock CAS, even if that's fixed overshoot is worse than undershoot. 
    • It's all about reducing the overall output. Reduce the source of it, you have wayyyy less to deal with in every other step and trick you play with. It's why something like a modern vehicle, so VW, Audi etc, there's thousands of tables for the ECU to calculate what it should be doing with the engine.   Why would you NOT reduce emissions the most effective way possible, when it has very minimal tradeoff, AND manufacturers are always struggling to meet the current standards.
×
×
  • Create New...