Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No, it comes down to pump fuel being horribly inconsistent and me not wanting to risk blowing up an engine because of one bad batch of fuel.

It's pretty simple to understand.

Horribly inconsistent.. If anything E85 should be quite consistent considering how it is contained at the servo unlike regular ULP and PULP.

There are others running around with 500rwkw (rb30's) without problems and not popping motors. Or is that an rb25 thing? :banana:

Horribly inconsistent.. If anything E85 should be quite consistent considering how it is contained at the servo unlike regular ULP and PULP.

There are others running around with 500rwkw (rb30's) without problems and not popping motors. Or is that an rb25 thing? :D

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

True.. However I think you worry too much given your fairly mild setup. :D

Unless that is you are throwing a GT42 or T51r and aiming for big numbers.

The GT35r 1.06. E85 or race fuel with good cams (265-272dur 10.5mm lift) your looking at ~420rwkw (behind a manual) on 20-22psi or so.

Your biggest problem are the cams when trying to make good power 350rwkw+ on reasonable boost levels.

Regardless you should be able to max out the turbo and able to 'easily' crack MTBT due to the GT35's large hot side on both E85 and race fuel. The tune WONT be ragged edge unless you try that on PUMP.

Any 'slight variation' in RON will not matter as you will be far away from the det threshold.

PULP is a completely different ball game as you won't get anywhere near MTBT so any slight variance in quality will have it knocking.

---

My ONLY concern with E85 is the blend variation between summer and winter.

There's a reason the market for Ethanol content testers has exploded in the states and it's not because it's the most reliably consistent fuel.

Let me put it another way:

If you tune an engine on the ragged edge, would you prefer to use a fuel with 0% difference between batches or 1% difference?

Why would you tune any engine on the ragged edge unless your a fool with lots of money.

True.. However I think you worry too much given your fairly mild setup. :/

Unless that is you are throwing a GT42 or T51r and aiming for big numbers.

Nothing wrong with aiming for big (mph) numbers with a 25 and GT35/1.06 combo. The engine combo was spec'd as an example of what can be achieved with a very, very common setup that people can relate to. Not a GT47-equipped dyno queen.

The GT35r 1.06. E85 or race fuel with good cams (265-272dur 10.5mm lift) your looking at ~420rwkw (behind a manual) on 20-22psi or so.

Your biggest problem are the cams when trying to make good power 350rwkw+ on reasonable boost levels.

Power figures only concern me to the extent that they're reflected by terminal speeds. My 5-speed stocker made 265kW on the bottle and ran 120mph @ 3240lbs race weight. Why could so many other similar cars only manage 114-116mph with 300kW? The point here is that I'd be happy for the dyno to show 150kW if it ran 140mph! :laugh:

Regardless you should be able to max out the turbo and able to 'easily' crack MTBT due to the GT35's large hot side on both E85 and race fuel. The tune WONT be ragged edge unless you try that on PUMP.

Any 'slight variation' in RON will not matter as you will be far away from the det threshold.

PULP is a completely different ball game as you won't get anywhere near MTBT so any slight variance in quality will have it knocking.

I'm not concerned with breaking records on PULP. If I was, I wouldn't have stopped tuning at 19psi and 11.xx:1 AFR's.

---

My ONLY concern with E85 is the blend variation between summer and winter.

I've highlighted the word that best describes my argument.

Regardless.

I'm not talking of comparing dyno figures/ET's or breaking records on pulp. :/

Simply pointing out where you may wish to improve if you want to squeeze every little bit out of that turbo.

Those cams are the down fall of the setup its as simple as that.

GT35r is a push over for E85. There is head room for a little variation due to MTBT (minimum timing best torque). I.e push more ignition in you make less power.

The summer/winter variation isn't too much of a hassle and will no doubt be sorted soon as summer approaches. Well at least on the dyno I run on as various track only cars have been setup for use with E85. I'll be sure to share the findings if the variation is an issue.

Regardless.

I'm not talking of comparing dyno figures/ET's or breaking records on pulp. :/

Simply pointing out where you may wish to improve if you want to squeeze every little bit out of that turbo.

Those cams are the down fall of the setup its as simple as that.

GT35r is a push over for E85. There is head room for a little variation due to MTBT (minimum timing best torque). I.e push more ignition in you make less power.

The summer/winter variation isn't too much of a hassle and will no doubt be sorted soon as summer approaches. Well at least on the dyno I run on as various track only cars have been setup for use with E85. I'll be sure to share the findings if the variation is an issue.

What cams are you referring to? The Poncams in my thing? The dyno seems to show that it's flowing well enough in all the right places. We'll see. The biggest problem I can see is that in my area, there's only one E85 servo and it's not what you might call busy or reputable. lol.

Interested in the fuel variation you see on the dyno.

Thanks for that.

The ragged edge is suicidal....! especialy with normal fuel's

With E85 it loses power before it detonates, so if your running on the edge with e85 you have a tune that is soooo far off from making max torque and power its not funny.

Say i would make max power at 25deg, i could turn it up to 35 and just lose power and torque with no detonation with e85 (this has not been tested but I am guessing for an example) :/

What cams are you referring to? The Poncams in my thing? The dyno seems to show that it's flowing well enough in all the right places. We'll see. The biggest problem I can see is that in my area, there's only one E85 servo and it's not what you might call busy or reputable. lol.

Interested in the fuel variation you see on the dyno.

Yeah the poncams. 256 8.5mm lift.

Obviously you want every little kw out of the setup possible (your ragged tune comment) so bigger lift cams are a way of doing this while improving 'reliability' and reducing the RON requirement of your fuel.

You may then feel happier within yourself running E85 and saving hundreds of $$ per tank as its not so 'highly strung'.

All though E85 is perfectly fine due to the huge amount of head room (MTBT) it provides.

My 5-speed stocker made 265kW on the bottle and ran 120mph @ 3240lbs race weight. Why could so many other similar cars only manage 114-116mph with 300kW? The point here is that I'd be happy for the dyno to show 150kW if it ran 140mph! :)

From what I've seen, 120mph with 260-270rwkw is right on the money. My numbers below were achieved at that power level.

From what I've seen, 120mph with 260-270rwkw is right on the money. My numbers below were achieved at that power level.

Not disputing that for a second. It's just people get so caught up with dyno figures it blows me away.

Found this link while doing some more research. Okay, I'll admit it, you guys planted enough of a seed to start my brain racing. Bastards!!

Aussie Ethanol

They list the Barrack Heights Ethanol service station as selling the stuff too. And the best bit? It's 2 mins drive from my house.

You bastards!

That is all.

You bastards.

Waiting for the final word from my tuner but yes, it's looking that way. I think the thing that sealed the deal was the servo so close to me and the fact that I'll give it a go, decide if it's worth the farting around and then go from there.

Adelaide had a shortage of E85 for a few weeks and i had to use varied blends of premium mixed with E85 and i was suprised how little E85 was needed to prevent knocking!! so i wouldnt stress too much if it's not 100% consistant, only downside i could see was a higher consumption!

Edited by 180or200

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
    • Some of them keep working fine. 9 out of 10 of them end up causing an absolute misery bleeding the system and get thrown on the workshop floor in a tantrum and never thought about again because they were never really needed and just added crap to the car that we could have done without. Same-same with HICAS, A-LSD, and various other stupidities that over eager 10x engineers thought we had to have.
×
×
  • Create New...