Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Guys,

I have just created a Petition thread in the facebook group: http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?topic=10...gid=32246238262

I want to put together a petition to send to the fuel companies to get in there faces about distributing this fuel more widespread keen as to get it in brissey

so yea chuck on your details and show your support :)

Cheers,

Dan

One thought on petitions... In the States (I'm from Las Vegas) they market E85 as a "Green Fuel".

It helps the environment and is renewable (and drives the food prices up because we are converting grain into ethanol instead of eating it…) so you might consider that approach.

Australia is obsessed with the environment and so called “green” things. So, instead of the “it’s good for my car” approach, try “it will help the environment and make us less dependant on foreign oil!” The government will love that! The servos can market it!

I have friends in the states that have converted their cars to E85 and they love it too!

I ran 15% E85 and 85% Premium in my STI and had great results. (Helps my GTR also!) Alway fun mixing fuels at the pump!

Edited by rapidroy

I have mentioned this before but here we go again.

There is no point doing petitions to get fuel companys to sell e85. Don't you think that if there was a way a fuel company could make more money they would be there making it?

Its not that they don't want to sell E85 its because the cost outlay to get the servo's fuel tank prepared and converted over to e85 is very expensive, it cost Rozelle $40,000 to upgrade the servo to stock E85 and the only reason why they have gone through this trouble is because they have a contract to supply E85 for CSR's company cars so they will be able to continually sell the fuel to make the money back.

Thats why all the other servo's had to stop selling E85 is because they have not had the required upgrades and you could just think about it like this, when could a independant servo be able to afford $40,000 just so they can make 1c a litre of sales from E85.. How many litres of fuel would they have to sell to make the money back before making a profit ?

a hell of alot, for the moment I think we are pretty lucky that United have offered E85 in few outlets they have so we have been able to do some testing and learn a bit out ethanol and even more so we are very lucky that they are selling it to the public as well! yes it does have a great potential but I just don't think that we will be seeing more outlets in the near future just because of this legal requirement to sell e85.

Does anyone know what happens to the E85 that stored in a non approved tank? the extra water that gets in there would be a concern has there been any tests ? do we know for sure what happens to the fuel in non converted tanks? whats the whole reason behind all this bullshit???.

I think that would be the place to start you might get more traction that way.

just something to think about.

555's

If that's 13B turbo 555's they actually flow 565 to 570 cc's at 34 psi. My standard FPR was 38 psi, so they were actually flowing 580 cc's. For the R33GTST I bumped that up to 3 bar, 44 psi, with a Nismo AFPR and they now flow more than 650 cc's plus the atomisation looks better on the flow tester. So 350 rwkw on E85 should be possible.

Cheers

Gary

If that's 13B turbo 555's they actually flow 565 to 570 cc's at 34 psi. My standard FPR was 38 psi, so they were actually flowing 580 cc's. For the R33GTST I bumped that up to 3 bar, 44 psi, with a Nismo AFPR and they now flow more than 650 cc's plus the atomisation looks better on the flow tester. So 350 rwkw on E85 should be possible.

Cheers

Gary

I ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at 340rwkw.

I have mentioned this before but here we go again.

There is no point doing petitions to get fuel companys to sell e85. Don't you think that if there was a way a fuel company could make more money they would be there making it?

Its not that they don't want to sell E85 its because the cost outlay to get the servo's fuel tank prepared and converted over to e85 is very expensive, it cost Rozelle $40,000 to upgrade the servo to stock E85 and the only reason why they have gone through this trouble is because they have a contract to supply E85 for CSR's company cars so they will be able to continually sell the fuel to make the money back.

Thats why all the other servo's had to stop selling E85 is because they have not had the required upgrades and you could just think about it like this, when could a independant servo be able to afford $40,000 just so they can make 1c a litre of sales from E85.. How many litres of fuel would they have to sell to make the money back before making a profit ?

a hell of alot, for the moment I think we are pretty lucky that United have offered E85 in few outlets they have so we have been able to do some testing and learn a bit out ethanol and even more so we are very lucky that they are selling it to the public as well! yes it does have a great potential but I just don't think that we will be seeing more outlets in the near future just because of this legal requirement to sell e85.

Does anyone know what happens to the E85 that stored in a non approved tank? the extra water that gets in there would be a concern has there been any tests ? do we know for sure what happens to the fuel in non converted tanks? whats the whole reason behind all this bullshit???.

I think that would be the place to start you might get more traction that way.

just something to think about.

This is very interesting. Around $40K is what it would cost these days to install a complete new underground tank of around 10,000 litres based on what I heard around the servos a few years back when 98 was introduced. Some had to have an extra tank and pumps installed so they could sell 92, 95 and 98. I can't see how it would be necessary to spend $40K to upgrade an existing tank for E85, a water filter and control valve would be a few hundered dollars and most. Recalibrating the existing pumps is a no brainer, lucky to cost $500 to do it. My thoughts are that anyone quoting $40K is talking about installing a brand new tank, not upgrading an existing one.

That's were the volume comes into play, obviously Rozelle had enough volume to justify the extra tank hence the $40K, or maybe CSR subsidised the tank. Once Holden introduces the E85 Commodore I suspect that the volume will be there for new tanks to be installed. Until then the only viable option would be for servos to convert existing tanks to E85. That means losing one other variety of fuel that they currently sell. That's still a volume question, will they sell more E85 than the current fue lthat is in that tank. Right now my guess would be no, there simply isn't the volume of E85 users.

But there is another alternative, instead of making only 1 or 2 cents per litre from the current E85 cost of 99 cents per litre, how about they charge the same as unleaded 92, that's $1.10 to $1.30 depending on the day of the week. Now that's 11 to 31 cents profit per litre, hence paying for the $40K tank with around 2,000 tank fills. I for one wouldn't mind paying 92 ron prices for 105 ron fuel. The truth is I would save the difference by not having to drive to Rozelle or Lansdown. Plus it's cheaper than buying E85 in drums which some guys do now.

Food for thought?

Cheers

Gary

yeah it is all well and good to sell e85 at 92 ron prices for the racers out there but I don't think people would pay that price in flex cars because then they could get more km's out of a tank of 92 for the same price then a tank of e85.

I believe the whole bowser needs to be replaced and the tank needs to be completly re-lined on the inside for e85 ??

I aint 100 % sure of the process but I was told that it costs 40k to convert over and seeing the amount of servo's that have had the upgrades you would think that there would be high cost involved.

I ran out of injectors with Nismo 740cc at 340rwkw.

What fuel pressure?

What boost?

What RPM?

It's a bit of a circle, as usual with cars.

Smaller injector plus higher pressure = higher flow

Until the fuel pump runs out of flow at that pressure

Then bigger injectors at lower pressure works as the pump doesn't have to work as hard against that lower pressure

That is further complicated when we add boost into the equation. Effective fuel pressure for the injectors + boost pressure = pressure that the pump must deliver.

It is possible for one car to make 340 rwkw at 1 bar, but another car might take 2.5 bar to make 340 rwkw, this effects the fuel flow.

Add to that the fact that a 340 at 1 bar engine can accommodate a wole lot more ignition timing and runs lower inlet temps, so it makes the 340 "easier" than the 340 at 2.5 bar engine.

To further complicate it, the higher rpm the 340 is developed at the smaller time the injector has to be effectively open (ie; while the inlet valve is open).

Should I mention tuning variations? Suffice to say there are still quite few arguments going on about what A/F ratios to use for the best from E85.

Keeping the above factors in mind I couldn't give an absolute yes or no, hence why "350 rwkw on E85 should be possible". Most certainly not guaranteed and very much depending on lots of factors.

Cheers

Gary

yeah it is all well and good to sell e85 at 92 ron prices for the racers out there but I don't think people would pay that price in flex cars because then they could get more km's out of a tank of 92 for the same price then a tank of e85.

The two flex cars I have tried, both SAAB's, used 25% to 30% more E85 than 92, about 20% to 25% more than 98. So the same price for 92 and E85 would work out around the same cost per K. And slightly lower cost per K than 98, both for better performance.

I believe the whole bowser needs to be replaced and the tank needs to be completly re-lined on the inside for e85 ??

About 1/3rd of all undergrounds tanks are the older, uncoated style. They have to be replaced, regardless of E85, in the next 5 years to pass EPA requirements. The later under ground tanks (the other 2/3rds) are all coated. So I don't see that E85 is a big issue for the 2/3rds and the other 1/3rd has to do it anyway. That was the situation in 2005 when the audit was carried out by AAL. Obviously it's better (more coated tanks) now.

I aint 100 % sure of the process but I was told that it costs 40k to convert over and seeing the amount of servo's that have had the upgrades you would think that there would be high cost involved.
Neither am I, but I do know that you could spend $40K on new multiple outlet, temperature and fuel density corrected, EFT enabled pumps. And they are being installed everyday in servos all over the place. If the volume is there then the money is, the trick is getting past the time of small volume, because there is no doubt that E85 will be mainstream in not too many years.

In the electronic industry we are what would be called "Early Adopters" and as such we have to pay more for the priveledge of being first with the latest. Compared to what blue ray players and their DVD's cost, paying for E85 at 92 prices is not so bad. In car speak, people pay more for a Prius than an Echo, just for the sake of being seen green, we wouldn't be paying more for being green, just the same or even less if you talk 98. That's not so terrible after all.

Cheers

Gary

Who's pulled their pump recently to checkout their sock after running E85?

E85CloggedFilter.jpg

Almost thinking its a bogus pic. :S

Damn!! thats a concern!!!

I will have to check mine when if i ever see my car again

Definitely that sock looks fairly extreme.

I've got mine apart again doing a little more work so I might as well pull the pump and check out the socks condition.

yeah you need to post up results and info etc etc

ok guys, my car is now running on E85. It's a NISTUNE remap and i don't have the cable or software yet, so yeah... can't switch if i run out of fuel in the middle of nowhere :P

Thought i'd add some thoughts on the injector talk. I've got 480cc Nismo's at the moment in the car, and stock FPR. We're running out of injectors at around 260rwkw, 15psi.

By rough calculations, 480cc = 480hp = ~350kw less 50kw drive-train loss = 300rwkw. That's what i was thinking... but yes, forgot to add that there is a 30% fuel increase with E85 :D So yah, we ran out... bugger.

To add to more good results with this fuel, i was getting 250rwkw at 17.5psi and with 2.5psi less, and not quite a flat AFR (runs pretty rich near top end, there's a little bit there if that's flattened out) we got +10rwkw, increased full boost response by about 100-200rpm and about 30nm more torque i believe. Don't have the dyno sheet, but yeah, basically the curve moved left and up, a weird looking combo, but cool none-the-less :P

getting some 740cc injectors asap. My tuner doesn't like adj FPR's, so we didn't go down that road.

That would be Paul,

His car is an animal. One of the quickest S13s in the country.

The 3076 is rated at 525hp. So it makes sense that the current power level is the highest efficient limit.

348 is at 19psi and 6800rpm.

At 23psi we might reach 360rwkw which would be really pushing the turbo. For the sake of reliability 350rwkw is plenty.

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

Edited by juggernaut1

I had a short chat with the manager at Lansdowne today, he has locked the E85 pump until something is cleared up, wouldn't tell me what, why or when. So it's back to Rozelle for me.

Cheers

Gary

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...