Jump to content
SAU Community

Guilt-toy Now Running On E85 !


Recommended Posts

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

He was frying 4th on the M5 :)

Mine will be getting tuned next week.

I made 348 at 19psi.23psi will be the aim next week, id like to see what 25psi makes on the RB though.

PJ also has water injection, so that would keep the air charge temps way down.

Im excited!!! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was frying 4th on the M5 :)

Mine will be getting tuned next week.

I made 348 at 19psi.23psi will be the aim next week, id like to see what 25psi makes on the RB though.

PJ also has water injection, so that would keep the air charge temps way down.

Im excited!!! :)

Yes frying 4th at 160klm's.

He wasn't using the water injection in that 503hp dyno run.....insanely enough there is more power to come.

So he's found and extra 50 odd rwhp from the bigger ex housing, 1 psi more boost, upgraded fuel system, M&W CDI and retune.

He also mentioned EGT's were way down with the larger ex housing - as you would expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Been there done that. after a few sets of tyres you wonder what the fuss was all about in the first place.

With a 3076 tho? OK techically PJ is running a T25 flanged HKS 56 trim 3037 on a 2 litre.

Bigger turbo's on bigger engines make bigger torque so you'd kinda expect more fryability.

Edited by juggernaut1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With a 3076 tho? OK techically PJ is running a T25 flanged HKS 56 trim 3037 on a 2 litre.

Bigger turbo's on bigger engines make bigger torque so you'd kinda expect more fryability.

regardless of turbo / setup, you get over it after a while :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

regardless of turbo / setup, you get over it after a while :)

Haha....yes always modifying for that bigger "fix" once you get used to it.

I'm always fascinated how enthusiasts are raising the bar all the time - its amazing what people are screwing out of there motors these days.

However, what was awesome last year is average this year....and so on......where will it ever end. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question people. What will 555cc injectors run out at roughly (kw) when using E85 on a gts-t?

Depends on how much fuel pressure you are running.

Cheers

Gary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question people. What will 555cc injectors run out at roughly (kw) when using E85 on a gts-t?

About 340rwkw on std pressure using BSFC = 0.6(which is about what I've found).

BTW I've made just over 600rwhp on E85 using 60LB/hr(630cc/min) with 4Bar base pressure on an XR6T which confirms my BSFC calc of 0.6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just got an email from PJ (Paul) and he just ran 503 rwhp on the JEM dyno with 25 psi on a 3076 and 1.12 exhaust housing on E85 with 1600cc indy blue injectors.

He mentioned they did run up to 27.5 psi boost and made more power but were concerned for the intregity of the SR20 block as it wasn't sleeved.

376 rwks' has surely got to be a record out of a 3076 on any engine.....

I'm running RB25 with a .68 on a 3037 Pro S.

Standard Manifolds E85 etc etc.

post-46183-1246700127_thumb.jpg

Edited by RB25DETS2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is some off the chart torque there champ....

must be hell of a ride...

what other supporting mods?

Yeah mate lots of fun.

Just the normal stuff

PFC

HKS Turbz

850 Sard injectors

Blitz LM cooler

Blitz POD

Standard BOV

Z32 AFM

Nismo FPR

Bosch 044 in tank

Gizzmo EBC

oh and lots of boost :D (23psi)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that is some off the chart torque there champ....

must be hell of a ride...

what other supporting mods?

also at what revs is it making full boost?

where is the torque read out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heres a torque read out just for you GT....180or200's car in red (3582 .82) and mine in blue(3037 .68) overlayed on the same Dyno.

900nm, nice.. my car was making around 1080nm to 1180nm but it never had a aggresive tune, 500cc don't make too much difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah mate lots of fun.

Just the normal stuff

PFC

HKS Turbz

850 Sard injectors

Blitz LM cooler

Blitz POD

Standard BOV

Z32 AFM

Nismo FPR

Bosch 044 in tank

Gizzmo EBC

oh and lots of boost ;) (23psi)

standard internals? 23psi??

what's with people running massive boost on un-opened engines?? i think hamish is like 23psi as well on his 33?? :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pressure from pre-ignition is far greater, since E85 doesnt have that problem should be fine! I've seen Lee's car hold 30 psi on the road on a cold night, that was radical!

Edited by 180or200
Link to comment
Share on other sites

people still think that E85 is the ticket to more safe power. This is not the case! you are still limited to the engines internals.

it is easier and safer to make the power but if you are using standard internals or have a weak engine it will still break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well I had 2 choices from then on. I either had to (reluctantly) move it on to another potential buyer and take the loss on the chin. Or I stick with it and turn it into a restoration project. I chose the latter. Project Snowstorm began! The frp body kit was the first thing to go. Turns out the original colour used to be silver. The Neo and gearbox were removed, along with the prop and exhaust system before it took a trip to the bodyshop, where I wouldn’t see it again for quite some time due to the pandemic hitting very soon after they took it away. Eventually, progress began and damage assessments made. Even the front chassis leg was in pretty bad shape!     Then the chopping commenced. For these guys it was just usual routine, to me it looked absolutely terrifying!   More to follow as I’m struggling to focus on my screen at 12:45 am!!!
    • That's the most absurd thing I've ever heard. I would go cut bellhousing over that monstrosity of a flywheel all day, every day. It puts a lot more mass further from the last main bearing. I've had nothing but problems with Collins in the past and refuse to ever buy their products again. I would not trust anything they tell you. He's playing his salesman card.  I'm currently at 640whp on a mustang dyno (~770bhp) with the intentions of running E85 and a lot more power this upcoming spring. Cheers, 
    • Nah, it's not the reduced knock margin. It is a direct mechanical effect of having to initiate the combustion earlier, while the piston is still rising, which starts to exert combustion pressure on the rising piston earlier, making the rest of the engine work harder to finish driving the piston up to TDC where the combustion pressure stops being a negative and starts being a positive. Your modern engine that only needs ~10° to make MBT doesn't waste the other 10 or so degrees of crank rotation. That's almost all of it. The difference in knock margin might go either way. Remember that modern engines to which you are currently comparing the long tractor engine (the RB) are now running super high compression, direct injection, tricky cam control and maybe even cylinder pressure sensors. You're not comparing apples with other fruit. It's apples and sea weed, or some other evolutionarily primitive vegetation. And remember, squish only really comes into play at the very end of the stroke. It certainly does good things, but it is not the biggest contributor to what's going on. It is quite possibly much less important in 4 valve head than 2 valvers also, because there is so much less squish available to a 4 valve anyway.
    • Food for thought, a longer stroke motor would need less ignition timing vs. a shorter stroke motor requiring more ignition timing.
    • Thanks Duncan, HART is only 10 mins from me (I did my bike license there), it'd be awesome if it ran these types of things.  Sutton Road does look good and they take fewer cars than SMSP which is good.  Surely you have enough land to lay a few million tonnes of concrete and some sprinklers D? 
×
×
  • Create New...