Jump to content
SAU Community

Guilt-toy Now Running On E85 !


Recommended Posts

There are no ecu options for the M35 Stagea's yet, i'm running an Emanage ultimate and switching a second map for the e85 with the front panel dip switches. Cold plugs too, probably some of the reason i'm having issues with cold starts. Anything below 15 degrees and she wont fire.

I have to put 10% extra premium in the tank at the moment or it doesn't start. As the throttle is electronic, I cant gas it to dump some fuel. Once its running, no problem.

Next mod will be a small petrol canister in the engine bay, with a pump and injector powered from a switch on the dash. That should solve it. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There aren't many plug options (no cheap copper plugs available) but I would rather the colder ones for now, from what I have researched they will still give a better burn once the engine is warm and I won't sacrifice performance for a simple cold start issue. A petrol primer button in the dash seems like a better option for winter as it only needs a teaspoon to fire, I have all the parts to make it, and I don't have to pay to retune and rewire the emanage.

Is anyone else had any issues with the cold mornings lately? I understand you can just stab the pedal and dump a bit of fuel but what happens if you don't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mmm, my issue is with the actual cranking, once it has started (first 10 seconds) all is good, although you are right, a bit sluggish until you get some warmth into it.

The amount of steam coming out the back on a cold morning start is amazing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

there is sugarcane ethanol and wheatgrain ethanol

i find the wheatgrain to be a better product. both fuels reached the same kw, same tuner same dyno, but the wheatgrain used 2 deg less timing

then some barrel e85 is blended with 98 while pump e85 is blended with 91

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its been re-filled. I wonder if fresh ethanol goes any better like premium... :bunny:

Joey, why didn't you just take a jerry or two up with you? I got great economy on a run down to PI track for the classic meet. I'm not giving up all that killer midrange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Good to see!

I forgot to mention the possible variance in my comment, though hopefully E85 comes as 85% +/- 1% max.

Seeing as my car is being fitted with new turbo, Nismo 740's (overkill for 280rwkw in prep for this wonderful elixir), and the ViPEC, I hope to be one of the first in Canberra to be running this from the pump!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...