Jump to content
SAU Community

Guilt-toy Now Running On E85 !


Recommended Posts

fark.. you guys are still going with this :)

I been in Abu Dhabi in UAE tuning, fuel here costs 50c a litre for 98 =) and money is never a problem for guys wanting to build cars...

how different is the Caltex stuff to the United stuff? With e85 i never had any starting issues, only difference was a extra 4 cranks of the engine and that was it.

It's stickied mate, thread'll nevar die!!!

I never tried the united stuff so i can't really comment on it, appart from saying it's f**king awesome fuel :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was the wideband im thinking about getting, what do you think for the price?

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...e=STRK:MEWAX:IT

I agree, does it have a programmable output for the ecu? I find logging with the EMU the best way to track afr's.

I have the LC-1 kit, its been in for nearly a year with no issue. I know a few guys have had problems with these in the past but for $200 it has been a good buy. Perhaps running E85 prolongs the sensor life?

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/xcart/p...=262&page=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fark.. you guys are still going with this :P

I been in Abu Dhabi in UAE tuning, fuel here costs 50c a litre for 98 =) and money is never a problem for guys wanting to build cars...

how different is the Caltex stuff to the United stuff? With e85 i never had any starting issues, only difference was a extra 4 cranks of the engine and that was it.

I have used all three ethanol brands available from the pump, There wasnt that much between them but the Caltex E70 definitely starts much better in my car and feels stronger.

Im wondering if there is a happy mixture, with enough petrol to help burn the mixture completely during the downward stroke, rather than pump it out the exhaust...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

interesting write up. anyone else tested the ethanol content of united's stuff?

btw the reason for caltex's higher price is they're simply selling it at 20c/L less than ulp regardless of the mix. so it goes up and down with ulp by the same amount, even tho its only 15-30% ulp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive only ever used the United fuel. No complaints here.

As for cold start it would start every time on the 3rd crank.

Ive noticed mine starts MUCH faster in the warmer weather we have had lately.

Starts just as fast as my commodore (which is straight away)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have more of an issue as the fly-by-wire throttle doesn't allow me to give it a squirt of pedal to start, coupled with the Emanage not being great with cranking enrichment... I really appreciate the e70 any morning its under 15 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not real impressed with Caltex's reason to swing between E70 and E85. Might be OK for those commodores but not for us with a single tune for 85% Ethanol.!!!

They are just following the US lead they have been told to follow. Its a GM global push.

Nothing 5 litres of petrol wont fix, the main hassle is you wont know when they are changing the mix. Remember, none of us are supposed to be running Caltex bio Eflex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How will 5 litre of petrol fix the issue when the ethanol content is already less then it should/needs to be?

What does it need to be? Do you have an e85 tune from one of the other suppliers?

If you are running Caltex you will have an e70 tune which will run fine when and if they switch over to e85 by just throwing a few litres of 98 in... Good idea to have a wideband if you are playing with the Caltex brew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What does it need to be? Do you have an e85 tune from one of the other suppliers?

If you are running Caltex you will have an e70 tune which will run fine when and if they switch over to e85 by just throwing a few litres of 98 in... Good idea to have a wideband if you are playing with the Caltex brew.

It will be tuned on the United E85 so I would assume that would be 85%. But I now see what your saying. If you tune it on the "E70" and you get "E85" a few litres of normal fuel would make it a bit more even. But are you going to bust out the lab in the fuel station to work out what it is everytime you need a tank of juice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be tuned on the United E85 so I would assume that would be 85%. But I now see what your saying. If you tune it on the "E70" and you get "E85" a few litres of normal fuel would make it a bit more even. But are you going to bust out the lab in the fuel station to work out what it is everytime you need a tank of juice?

If you call a simple wideband sensor and gauge a "lab" lol, United e85 seems to be e90-95 from my experience, the Southland Manildra blend is closer to the mark. I would suggest tuning for the fuel you plan to use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have mine tuned on E85 from united. was already mega fat on the dyno due to a problem we had on the day, but around the 0.76 lambda mark.

today at winton, with the caltex E70 in it, used mix trim to take out 8% of fuel and it was still at 0.71 on the meter (microtech meter only reads as low as 0.71).

caltex mix is meant to be from march to mid november.

im going to give it a week, then get a litre from caltex and do another test to see if the tanks have been filled with E85 yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...