Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have always liked Subaru's

Rex's, foresters, liberties..... i think they are very nice looking cars...... but i have to say that the new rex and the forester look like they were designed by the same people that designed daihatsu's and the honda CRV..... They look awful.

I have tried to let the new rex grow on me but its not working, its been half a year now and they still look ugly to me.

what are your views???

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239351-whats-the-deal-with-the-new-subarus/
Share on other sites

Impreza's have let the public down big time.

Ever since the lead designer from I think it was Alfa (correct me if im wrong) moved to Subaru, he has destroyed that model.

I think the last good looking Impreza/WRX was the MY03 model.

I remeber when i saw spy shots of the 'bug eye' - hideous.

Now they have totally lost the plot.

everyone hated the bug eye but they had grown on me, the sti just before this hatch came out was sweet, i saw a 2 door old skool impreza in the city last night, i'm still a fan of the 22b's

everyone hated the bug eye but they had grown on me, the sti just before this hatch came out was sweet, i saw a 2 door old skool impreza in the city last night, i'm still a fan of the 22b's

22b's = epic win.

current model = epic fail.

...the only models i didnt like is the one now and the bug eyed one...but even the bug eyed one looks like jessica alba compared to the hideous one we have now. its lost all its 'rexiness'...

although that being said, performance has been pretty good...engine etc. just the exterior killed it...and the interior..is so cheap and nasty.

hatches arn't that bad, look at the current astra coupe, they also come in a turbo version that would rival my gtst in a straight line..... the VW R32 is very sexy aswell and even the mazda 3 MPS looks pretty decent and hammers very hard, the new rex and the forester are going to kill their sports enthusiast side of sales..... really would you buy a rex sti at the moment or a VW R32, same power, similar price, both awd, vw looks so much hotter....... personally i'll stay with skylines but still.....

Hey buddy,

I work for subaru, the reason they designed the new impreza/wrx the way they did was because they were trying to appeal to a different market. When you previously thought WRX etc you normally thought young males..or older males (40ish)

They wanted to appeal more towards women and try and grow their "fan base" but in doing so alot of die-hard WRX/STI fans have been turned away purely because they don't like the shape.

However they will be bringing out a sedan later this year (the official launch was last month) however i still think it'll turn alot of ppl off the WRX.

As for the forester, i can't comment much, and i do think that the previous model XT (turbo) Forester looks better than the current. I think they were just trying to go with the current design trends of the market (Mitsubishi Outlander looks somewhat similar)

Hope this helps you mate

Nick

^ beat me to it. lol

If i remember correctly, Subaru's official statement was that it wanted to shed its 'boy racer' reputation for a more mature stance.

well it worked...no one with a decent sense of taste can love that thing.

This generation around, the evo design team has owned subaru...even a normal lancer looks more appealing.

Edited by JI34GT
i think it's Subaru going for a more conservative image.. to appeal to more family-minded people. Thus, the harder-edge WRXs of old were given the boot.

so now subaru is allowed to make cars ugly because they are trying to appeal to the same people that are up to their throats in loan repayments and mortgages?????? not a smart move lol

^ beat me to it. lol

If i remember correctly, Subaru's official statement was that it wanted to shed its 'boy racer' reputation for a more mature stance.well it worked...no one with a decent sense of taste can love that thing.

This generation around, the evo design team has owned subaru...even a normal lancer looks more appealing.

exactly

Love the new STi. Went and had a look and sit in it about 3 weeks ago and to me it had an awesome interior with everything looking well finished, nothing looking takky at all. Outside with the flared guards and the little designer features to make it look more sporty went down a treat.

Not a big fan of the other models ( rs, wrx, etc ) but sorry to say but I think this one has it over the older models. For me the older models were a rally car and looked the part, this thing looks much more like a sleek and stylish car you could do your everyday motoring in.

i still see fail all over it, a sports car is a sports car lol, let the other market buy the outback..... the new sedan still looks pretty average.... imagine nissan bringing out the new gtr looking like that....

also sales figures show this car isn't selling, although the basic model imprezzas are selling better than the wrx and sti's.... and the comment about the boy racer sounds right but its a f**king rally car to begin with lol whats next???? a ferrari being made into hatchback to get rid of the pompas rich boy racer image or to get rid of the drug dealer image???? or mabey ford will reintroduce the F250 as a honda crv rival????

Isnt this why car makers have different models in the first place?

Most car companies have the racer image in one of their models...

nissan= skyline, silvia, 350z (silvia is meant to be relaunched again next year)

Toyota= supra, chaser, they trying to make the bloody Aurion a racer car

Subaru= used to have the rex, not anymore ( too busy trying to make themselves better with the older generation)

Suzuki= little rally version swift from mid $20k drive away

even hyundai with the tiburon (although it failed here was a great success in USA)

Impreza's have let the public down big time.

Ever since the lead designer from I think it was Alfa (correct me if im wrong) moved to Subaru, he has destroyed that model.

I think the last good looking Impreza/WRX was the MY03 model.

I remeber when i saw spy shots of the 'bug eye' - hideous.

Now they have totally lost the plot.

agree the 03 was the nicest shape to date

DSC03348ed.jpg

Edited by Amir

when i first saw the new WRX i seriously thought someone had badged a totally different car lol... shouldnt they use a totally different make of car to appeal to other ppl.. lots of ppl buy because of the racer image.. why not just make a ghey version and a racer version.. as Kujotk said.. every brand has their racer cars..

but on the side of attracting women.. on my trip to/from work.. i see more women driving WRX/RS then men now.. And that's the bug eye version.. not this new creation of a blind man.. so the older models were attracting other groups

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam camp bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
    • A thing I wasn’t happy with with enthusiast was during the initial phone call they told me they’d insure it for 130k but needed photos.   I then sent them photos and they told me $80k as there were other cars either similar modifications available for around that price, I told them to send me the links to said cars so that I can buy them. i then sent the modification list with prices of the parts (no labor) and the price then came to 115k, which is still shy of the 130 that was agreed in the initial phone call 
×
×
  • Create New...