Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

scan0002.jpg

scan0001.jpg

So I've recently replaced my old HKS 2530'S with the GARRETT 2860'S-5. I was instantly impressed with the low down power. I'm still trying to convert the speed into RPM to get a direct comparison. Because the shop that did the power run with the garrett's was a V8 place they didnt realise the RPM limit, getting off it at around 7,000rpm in 4th opposed to 8,200rpm so the run was never complete.

Now, they were different dyno's but I've had my car on both previously making nearly the same power. But needless to say these GARRETT turbo's are good bang for buck. On the garrett run we had major issues with wheel spin, seen in the dyno also.

HKS 2530'S made 21PSI at 5300

GARRETT 2860'S made 20PSI at 4,300

Edited by monga
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/239481-garrett-2860-5-v-hks-2530s/
Share on other sites

Can you get it on the same dyno? Just from the corrections you can see a number of differences

IT Temp - 52degree vs 23 (which will affect outright power signifigantly)

Shoot6F vs Shoot6

And the list goes on :happy:

That first graph though, the 2530's come on pretty late :banana:

Have you changed anything other than the turbos??? Like cam gears, cams, tune etc?

I ask as the 2530's arent making 320rwkw till 5800rpm so there was definately something 'up' with the 2530 run. They should be markedly more responsive than that.

Change nothing, just took those turbo's off then replaced them with new ones. The two dyno's make very similar power, as I've compared in the past. Regardless its a tuning tool and turbo's worth just over 2k are good value.

What mods are done to your car?

And it might be good to get another dyno done showing RPM. Might be worth it since you have gone to this length of trouble.

IMO the biggest difference between hks 2530 and the -5 is that HKS changes the inside of their housing which allows more airm gives slower spool up time but more top end if that makes sense.

What mods are done to your car?

And it might be good to get another dyno done showing RPM. Might be worth it since you have gone to this length of trouble.

IMO the biggest difference between hks 2530 and the -5 is that HKS changes the inside of their housing which allows more airm gives slower spool up time but more top end if that makes sense.

R32 GTR's do 28.5 km/h per 1000rpm in fourth.

Change nothing, just took those turbo's off then replaced them with new ones. The two dyno's make very similar power, as I've compared in the past. Regardless its a tuning tool and turbo's worth just over 2k are good value.

Oh there is no dbout price vs effectiveness the garretts win hands down, totally agree there.

Im just @ a loss as to your 2530 response (or lack there of), its very sub-standard where they should be much closer to the -5's response :banana:

240rwkw @ 5000rpm is no good for the 2530!

Do you have cam gears?

Maybe the 2530's like a different setting to the -5's perhaps? (just thinking what could be the cause)

No cam gears dude.

I think the 2530's are reasonable, here is Jonn's dyno with the 2.8 stroker with the same sort of power line locally here also.

34nl5si.jpg

I think the 2530's would handle more boost and rpm, the 2860's feel awesome for the track ect.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...st&id=15204

Thats a 2530 graph, and you can see its very similar to your -5's graph give or take a bit which is fair enough.

It was m&m's setup from a couple years ago.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...t&p=1797201

Its all interesting :(

You've got big cams too dont ya? (was looking @ ur post in RB26 dyno thread)

Cam's are reasonable dude, depends on tune also I guess if we increased the timing the power band could change. I'll hunt around but I've got my garagesauras power run around here somewere and its got bulk timing tuned to 102RON and brings them on much earlier.

generally do the 2530s run out of puff or blow first?

I was thinking 350kw should be achievable from my car with 2530s without too much lag

it was laggy before with the 2530s, exhaust and boost controller, but i was thinking porting, and cam gears should be enough to help avoid this?

I think the 2860's will run out of puff before the 2530's, which technically will make more outright and topend power. 350kw is achievable wth both.

Depends what you call lag, if your happy with power around 4,500-5,000rpm you should be fine.

Few graphs from here on the West.

xnhmp4.jpg

Great graph...would have loved to see -7's and -9's plotted as well.

2530's and -5's improve response with a good set of Cams.

GT-RS can only improve with a larger displacement.

Interesting graph comparo Brockaz, some setups have given interesting results!

Actually Brockaz - do you have Gav's graph with the new turbos on it to stick into that?

It would be something to drool over :banana:

im about to install a set of -5's on my gtr in the next week or so, waiting for them to come in as they are out of stock.. will post my graph as soon as its dynoed.. our goal is the low to mid 300kw at all 4s mark

from what i have heard, definately great bank for buck with the garretts

Actually Brockaz - do you have Gav's graph with the new turbos on it to stick into that?

It would be something to drool over :banana:

I only have one of his preliminary tunes.

I'll see if I can get a copy of his latest graph, which shows the -5's with roughly the same top end as the GT-RS's but with the massive midrange.

I can probably get a copy of a set of GT-SS's running abour 460hp to compare as well, so I've kept all the data and will add to it when I get the chance.

Oh, and the 2.8L of John's with the 2530's is running roughly 20psi.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other question, is there a chance that changing the idle speed can lead you down a rabbit hole and is the reason the tuner didn't touch it? Reason I ask is because if that's the reason the tuner avoided it then I probably shouldn't be touching it lol.
    • Pfft. As if I'd ever point a high pressure washer at my car.
    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I could do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free. It's only about 50L per year, but that's ~$100. A few extra pizzas is always welcome. Note that I have a record of every tank of fuel that has ever gone through my car except for a handful put in by someone else, like my mechanic. I can show you the difference between stock RB20 and tuned RB20, stock RB5Neo and tuned, winter and summer fuel blends, winter and summer fuel blends when the ambient temperature is not appropriate for the blend, working O2 sensor, blown O2 sensor, boosting f**k out of it and frightened to boost it because it is pinging, and so on. OK, I probably can't do all that now with 100% clarity - but at the time when any of those things were in event, you could see it in the records. There's 25+ years of simple tank after tank records, so you have to look for landmarks to work out approximately how old any single record is. What's really important is the meta data and that lives in my head.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
×
×
  • Create New...