Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :ermm:

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :ermm:

what do jun make for turbo application? Theyre very quiet at idle but anything over 2500 rpm is a very throaty sound

-D

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :)

probably designed for a little back pressure

+1 for ET.

rad guy, great work, and good price. twin 2.5" straight pipes from the cats (basically straight off the extractors), junBL x-pipe, lukey resi's, sounds awesome.

buy mine,

full jap spec system, with twin drift pipes

3 inch the whole way, hi-flow cat like you've never seen before (no its not gutted)

and ask a few ppl on here that know my car it looks tough and sounds tougher.

I was recommended the Spiral muffler from ET also. I did a little research and they are not recommended for turbo application.

The JunBL Spiral muffler is designed for N/A application.

But in saying that 3.5" with 400hp at the fly I can't see it being a problem. :)

that's crap he and mark formulated that muffler for all types of cars and i know this because i know Mr LIm aka JunBL owner inventer ect and Marky

i dont know why Kellie said metal cat, cos im pretty sure she doesn't even hav a cat on her car :bunny:

thats right i dont have a cat i said all that stuff about the exhaust because thats what Marky would recomend

:D

heaps funny for someone to get defected :)

that's crap he and mark formulated that muffler for all types of cars and i know this because i know Mr LIm aka JunBL owner inventer ect and Marky

oeeerrr. :P

Crap.. the spiral is there to kill noise with 'minimal' impact on exhaust flow given the size of the Milotin.

If you wish to make some reasonable 250rwkw+ power out of the car and worried about noise then its worth while considering 2x larger body 3-3.5" straight through mufflers.

Straight through is by far the best especially if you have plans for the car. Those louvres occupy area within the pipe reducing the available area for air to be pushed through.

If a 3" straight through muffler begins to struggle over 270rwkw reducing the available surface area will introduce backpressure. Sure it will sound quieter but it will kill power.

The spiral muffler is a shit load better than the multipass 'turbo' muffler but none the less if its all out performance you want straight through is the best.

Especially if your pushing your size pipe near its flow limits.

JunBL no where claim the spiral offers better 'power' performance than a straight through muffler. It simply states they are one of the best on the market that 'increase' (overstock) power while retaining streetable noise.

Canons are shit at noise control. So IMO its run a Milotin with reduced performance but a quieter exhaust or run a large body straight through muffler with reasonable sound control and improved performance.

All depends on the plans for the car. Their 3.5" spiral should be fine but from speaking to a few workshops the 3" kills power a tad.

Get Mark to throw up some dyno sheets of his new released 3.5" spiral. Would like to see something making up around 300rwkw+ with one. 3.5" tyypically = 300+rwkw territory.

A nice comparison - No mufflers, straight through canon, spiral canon.

The spiral muffler is a shit load better than the multipass 'turbo' muffler but none the less if its all out performance you want straight through is the best.

Especially if your pushing your size pipe near its flow limits.

Hence why I went for a Kakimoto dual setup (approx 103db unfortunately).

When I want quiet, I shove a couple of cone silencers into the two tips and reduces by approx 10db.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Another question sorry, what stainless do u use in the turbo external WG plumb back piping? Is it 321, 316 or 304?
    • Right, its been a while for updating this car, but I made some small but important progress today. In the end I bought an Ecutek dongle from the Australian distributor Tunehouse (for local hardware support) but have gone with a remote tune from Racebox in the US (because they have done millions of these, and I could not find any tuner where I could access the tune anyway as they are all password locked). The App is reasonably easy to work with, but the PC software reminds me of Haltech's ECU Manager that you need to use with the Plat Pro ECUs, it is a nightmare.  Anyway, I sent the details over, got back a tune file and a request for data logs. I finally got a chance to access a private test track today as they want redline logs in 3rd and 4th, and have sent them back for the first round of reviews. The main difference in the tune is going from 1.0 (stock) to 1.3 bar (19psi), although I'm sure is a lot of other stuff in the background. Keeping in mind this is a dead stock car with 125,000klm, this is what the App's performance test claimed: Before After Interesting to note that both 400m tests had the same terminal speed (158klm/h) but different ETs. And no, the speed limiter seems to be higher than that at 186kl/h. Summary of the key logged parameters for the 3rd and 4th gear runs were: Those little turbos were certainly whizzing at 200,000rpm+.  Also I'm really not that excited about oil pressure 55psi at redline so I think I'll go thicker than 5w30 (nissan recommend 0w20....) and see if that improves it. Other than that (and the big boost spike....) everything looks good as a start to me.
    • Just one more post to show the final result and the original "janky" solution for a laugh. Everything feels really tight and no wobbling at all, very pleased 🙂
    • After drying a few days, time to put her back together 
×
×
  • Create New...