Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just wondering what you guys think of this setup im working on where ive place the intercooler behind the radiator support and the radiator behind that. im looking at a plazmaman or similar plenum just to finish it off. tell me what you think any constructive critisism would be helpful. the cars currently being setup for hillclimbs and motorkhanas so im looking for response. and yes the afm is mounted in the cooler piping

post-50393-1223963221_thumb.jpg

post-50393-1223963240_thumb.jpg

post-50393-1223963253_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/240155-intercooler-setup/
Share on other sites

different

did you do this to minimise intercooler piping? was there a big difference in response due to it? just curious

edit: oh just realised that its not complete yet.

tbh i didnt notice a massive difference in lag when i have gone from smic or tmic to fmic. a lot of extra piping but i doubt there would be much difference in laptimes due to response

Edited by InterCooL
different

did you do this to minimise intercooler piping? was there a big difference in response due to it? just curious

yeah that was the idea not quite complete yet because i still havnt decided on what plenum to use i reckon response should improve a bit i was running a normal fmic before this so as the pipings probably over a meter shorter i am expecting an improvement

edit: oh just realised that its not complete yet.

tbh i didnt notice a massive difference in lag when i have gone from smic or tmic to fmic. a lot of extra piping but i doubt there would be much difference in laptimes due to response

yeah its probably not really all that necessary but i like to think every bit helps. also as the car has a vg30 turbo the lags annoying me so if i can reduce that even just slightly i will be happy

IMO your going to struggle.

Removing the clutch fan and replacing it with a set of thermo's is one thing (and generally doesnt seem to work that well)

But to then then stick a cooler infront of it further restricting the air/function of the radiator... thats another. Especially with lower speed events like hillclimb/khana's where big speed (and therefore airflow) isnt neccesarily going to match the high ends of 1st/2nd gear

I'd expect issues keeping the car cool. yYour going to need as much ducting as possible, blanking off the sides to force air through etc etc

If you wanted to improve response, using a more appropriately sized cooler would have been a better idea... and at the same time moving it infront of the rad support to reduce the heatsoak/transfer.

Any gain from moving the piping is going to be lost by the increase in heat (and size of cooler) as i see it.

People might/might not agree, but thats what i reckon with buggering around with my varying setups over the years.

yeah heat transfer from the radiator is something i was concerned about. on the track i will be running water spray and possibly a water injection system to try help keep it cool. ive already started making some ducting and various deflectors to try and direct as much air to the cooler as possible. itll be running at least two 10inch ir possibly bigger spal thermo fans that will be left on constanly ie. no thermo switch and also a nismo thermostadt. the afm is also going to be placed either back in the intake or onto the cold side of the intercooler. and all cooler pipes are to be wrapped in thermo tape. it will also be using a vertex front bumper thats been modified to supply more air to the coolers

Hey Phunky, my tuner has done that setup with an SR in an S14 using an inverted ARE cooler. From memory there is a larger gap btn the cooler and radiator which has then been sealed. Probably to minimise radiant heat. Used AU thermo fans.

Anyway it puts out 440rwhp and apparently holds the lap record at Barbagello on the short circuit. It also generally wins the supersprints and hill climbs at Barbagello....which is not bad for a streetcar with full interior (with half cage). So it can't be a bad setup.

I also spoke to Wayne Embleton of Embleton Engineering here in Perth about that sort of setup some time ago. He mentioned that the response from the shorter piping was noticeably improved.

Cheers,

im my general opinion, there is always going to be a big letdown to these style of modifications ie something thats different. Cars are designed to be optimal from factory but can be improved by adding a fmic etc, but i'd just follow what others have done successfully as they have already experimented with it and have reported good results.

my concerns are you'll need to carefully duct air to them, and not enough gap between rad and intercooler. you are going to get a lot of heat transfer from rad to intercooler which is not good. especially when you are sitting still at the start of a hillclimb for example your intercooelr is going to get heatsoaked very quickly. with it getting up to 80degrees plus BEFORE you even begin pumping any boost through it. it might end up being an interwarmer for the first half of a run! also with so little room between engine and rad you certainly can't fit the standard engine fan and will have trouble fitting any decent sized electric fans either.

I really don't think any benefit in piping length is worth the negatives. also you now have some quite tight radius bends in that pipework which wouldn't be so bad in a more traditional layout.

I'm all for trying new things and the idea had some legs but in practice I don't think it will prove worthwhile.

hey thanks for all the comments guys i'll be taking them into consideration. a few problems have already been rectified. i have placed the afm back into the intake and mad a new hot pipe which is a lot smother and is one piece. it seems everyone is generally against the idea of thermo fans if anyone here is running thermo's can you let me know if theyre working any good. i still like the idea of this setup and have seen several track and drift cars running a similar setup. i am currently working on some ideas to try and reduce heat soak into the intercooler. heres an updated pic

post-50393-1224037213_thumb.jpg

Here is another option.

Basically the intercooler is in the typical location, however the piping enters up the top and at the back of the cooler. Your reduce your piping length and reduce heatsoak. However, it nessecitates cutting the body work on each side of the radiator for the pipe work. This setup is made by Full-Race (home of the twin scroll specialists) in the US.

Car9.jpg

^^ mine is similar in thought, the piping goes under/behind the headlight rather than right around either side, very short

I see 69-70 degree temp on a 25 degree day with a bit of a poke :D

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63198.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63195.html

^^ mine is similar in thought, the piping goes under/behind the headlight rather than right around either side, very short

I see 69-70 degree temp on a 25 degree day with a bit of a poke :D

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63198.html

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/co...image63195.html

nismoid. with your set-up why does the pipe turn 180 degrees, then airflow needs to turn 90 degrees again inside the cooler. you could have just had it go straight into the side of the cooler instead of making it curve back on itself and come into the front of the cooler and then it's hitting the tank at right angles instead of straight in. possibly not the best plan. the pipe run is a good idea though, but the entry to the intercooler is weird. way harder than it had to be...

in fact doing it that way would have saved more piping length too and got rid of a few bends.

gallery_709_1130_73782.jpg

I would just do it like this:

medgallery7091130737821kf1.jpg

yeah i know.

Its hard to see from the pics, but the end tank is curved and the exit point you show is the skinniest part of the end tank... was far too hard to get it to be done the other way

would have required new end tanks etc etc.

Its a replacement core for a GTS-R (ARC) so i didnt wanna butcher it too much incase i sell or something later on.

Im thinking of going a one-off custom one at some point, but it'll have to do for now!

I have twin spal thermo's on my rb26 with a thick 57mm koyo radiator and dont have any issues. The weekend we got it running it was straight to a local car show where it cruised around at speeds lower than 20km'h in 35-40deg heat with regular burnouts, sitting in lines for up to an hour idling etc. According to the ecu water temps never went above 87degC. The previous year with a clutch fan and stock radiator temps were only a few deg lower (obv at low speeds the thinner radiator performed better, and during burnouts the clutch fan would have been pulling more air but overall there wasnt a great deal of difference).

yes im bringing this post back to life to say that i am now looking at a boot mounted radiator setup not unlike the team orange drift cars or garage sauras gold r32 GTR i think this setup will provide a solution to al the previously mentioned problems with my original design. Before you all tell me how complex this is to do please keep in mind i am well aware of this and have the necessary equiptment and skills to complete such a modification. once again any coments or constructive critisism would be much appreciated

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • What do you mean?  In between the two I shared?  They're the same boost   This will be insane.   A mate has a GTSt with a 9:1 RB30/25 with Tomei 256 cams and a Borg S362SX-E that is already a beast from the basement but has a stock 5 speed and will probably get a ZF8 one day.  After the G35 900 RB26 setup I'd be lying if the topic of "Wtf would a divided G35 be like on this thing?" idea hadn't come up - you'd definitely want a wide boost control range setup with it, as even with the less responsive and potent S361 we're having to ramp boost in from very low levels in the early gears.
    • ZF8 is faster, wider ratio spread, better in every way. I do not dispute this. But I have brain damage and I want the feeling of shifting gears. To me the extra work is fun, but I daily an automatic and in the US like 90+% of cars are automatic so a manual transmission is an "exotic" experience. If I want an automatic I've driven an F80 M3 with DCT more than a few times and it's incredibly capable but it's emotionally vacant to me.
    • Different folks for different folks I guess - for me, the 6MT > ZF8 claim is wild.  If I had a manual Skyline I'd be saving up fix that with a ZF8.  I went for a M135i, has the N55 which resolves a lot of the issues the N54 has, it already has the ZF8, is barely heavier than an R34 GTt, full boost before 2000rpm while also being real-word-faster than my old 280kw @ hubs R33 GTS25t and doing absolutely everything better.  There's nothing I'd change on it to be more like my old Skyline, tbh... it doesn't sound the same but it's got it's own awesome sound - definitely not worse.   To be fair I can't argue with most of those points.  I guess i was pointing it out as a comparison for a Skyline GTR and it's much closer all around there, like the weight difference between an M240i and an R34 GT-R isn't that much etc.   As above, I ended up getting an M135i which is in the 1400kg range - the M140 and M240is that you can get up till 2018 are B58, ZF8, RWD and in the 1400kg range which is a bit of fun... but doesn't fit the tyre etc of the Supra.  They are a run drive, though- maybe no an A90 Supra but a huge upgrade over a Skyline "sporty chassis" wise.    
    • Im loving this thread. I have a g35/900 t4 split 1.00 ar going on my rb30/25 with 9:1 and 264 cams. its drive by wire and with vct i think it should spool nicely. I have the 8speed gearbox on the floor ready to go on so full boost changes will be a thing if the tyres can deal with it. it should always be on boost
    • The trouble for me is the automatic takes away so much from it. And the E92 has hydraulic power steering. Even after putting in an LSD you're looking at re-mapping the xDrive to be more like a Skyline which is just a lot of effort for something that is supposed to be easier and cheaper. I consider the E92 335i 6MT to basically be the obviously superior car to something like an R34 GTT. Half the price out here, the N54 makes so much more power so easily, is a far more refined car, etc. You do have to deal with the nightmare of the N54's foibles vs the B58 which is comparatively miles better and if a turbo does fail it's only one of them vs two and a lot less pipe spaghetti.  996 or 997 Turbo has the AWD system mapped like a Skyline. Basically always RWD unless engaging the front axle makes sense. A coworker let me drive his 997.2 Turbo 6MT and it's absolutely tremendous. I don't think I'd want more power in a street car.
×
×
  • Create New...