Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

Do you know whta the problem is with the SAFCII ? Does the standard computer try to over right the settings and take control?

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

Did the guys at Unique motorsports say what the problem was? The ecu can't really "override the settings" because all the SAFC does is to modify the signal from the AFM thus creating a new reality for the ecu. One downside can be that it alters your timing so they should really be fitted together with an Apexi SITC so that your timing can be fine tuned. I will be fitting both over the weekend together with a wideband sensor and afr meter (LM2) so I can start tuning - although this is on an RB25DET. I don't know how the V6 is different but think the SAFC/SITC should work OK too.

p.s some tuning tips from SK which may or may not be useful to your particular car/engine:

Recently a few guys have been asking me about how to get around the DFA (SAFC) compromise of leaner A/F ratios at high boost and higher rpm and richer A/F ratios during (and sometimes just after) boost build. The problem is if you increase the AFM voltage at higher rpm (to get richer A/F ratios) the standard ECU sees this as increased airflow, which may push it into R&R mapping. Which results in power dips and a lack of response. Sometimes this doesn't show up on the dyno but raises it ugly head when you drive in variable conditions on the road or track.

To fix this “R&R versus too lean at higher boost” problem you have to increase the fuel pressure (via an adjustable fuel pressure regulator). The trick is to increase the fuel pressure just enough to get the A/F ratios to the target (say 12 to 1) in the rpm range that it is currently running too lean (usually above 4,500 rpm).

For adjustable FPR I use the Nismo bolt on style, ~$150 from Nengun.

Set the FPR to give 45psi above boost when boost has stabilised (anything above c3000 rev/min).

Once you get the higher rpm A/F ratios in the range that you want them, you use the DFA (SAFC) to lean it out in the other rpm ranges where it will then be too rich. This (reduced AFM voltage) also helps with preventing the ECU going to R&R, as it uses lower airflow map load points. So you get 2 benefits.

In order to lean out the A/F ratios, the DFA settings are used to reduce the AFM voltage (that the ECU sees), which usually advances the ignition timing. So the SITC is used to retard the ignition timing. This retarding is mostly required at revs over 4,500 rpm. Most times under 4,000 rpm you can sneak in a bit more advance, which improves the response considerably.

If you are using a suitable turbo (eg; GCG ball bearing high flow) the adj FPR, DFA and SITC you should be able to get the boost up to 1 bar, maybe 1.1 bar. That will give you another 30 to 40 kW over the 12 psi that you may well be restricted to if you don’t use the adj FPR to cure the high rpm leanness first. It does require some fiddling around, but no more than trying to achieve the same results with a Power FC on a manual. It’s just a matter of tuning the right bit first.

Hope that was of some help to fellow auto owners.

Did the guys at Unique motorsports say what the problem was? The ecu can't really "override the settings" because all the SAFC does is to modify the signal from the AFM thus creating a new reality for the ecu. One downside can be that it alters your timing so they should really be fitted together with an Apexi SITC so that your timing can be fine tuned. I will be fitting both over the weekend together with a wideband sensor and afr meter (LM2) so I can start tuning - although this is on an RB25DET. I don't know how the V6 is different but think the SAFC/SITC should work OK too.

p.s some tuning tips from SK which may or may not be useful to your particular car/engine:

Recently a few guys have been asking me about how to get around the DFA (SAFC) compromise of leaner A/F ratios at high boost and higher rpm and richer A/F ratios during (and sometimes just after) boost build. The problem is if you increase the AFM voltage at higher rpm (to get richer A/F ratios) the standard ECU sees this as increased airflow, which may push it into R&R mapping. Which results in power dips and a lack of response. Sometimes this doesn't show up on the dyno but raises it ugly head when you drive in variable conditions on the road or track.

To fix this “R&R versus too lean at higher boost” problem you have to increase the fuel pressure (via an adjustable fuel pressure regulator). The trick is to increase the fuel pressure just enough to get the A/F ratios to the target (say 12 to 1) in the rpm range that it is currently running too lean (usually above 4,500 rpm).

For adjustable FPR I use the Nismo bolt on style, ~$150 from Nengun.

Set the FPR to give 45psi above boost when boost has stabilised (anything above c3000 rev/min).

Once you get the higher rpm A/F ratios in the range that you want them, you use the DFA (SAFC) to lean it out in the other rpm ranges where it will then be too rich. This (reduced AFM voltage) also helps with preventing the ECU going to R&R, as it uses lower airflow map load points. So you get 2 benefits.

In order to lean out the A/F ratios, the DFA settings are used to reduce the AFM voltage (that the ECU sees), which usually advances the ignition timing. So the SITC is used to retard the ignition timing. This retarding is mostly required at revs over 4,500 rpm. Most times under 4,000 rpm you can sneak in a bit more advance, which improves the response considerably.

If you are using a suitable turbo (eg; GCG ball bearing high flow) the adj FPR, DFA and SITC you should be able to get the boost up to 1 bar, maybe 1.1 bar. That will give you another 30 to 40 kW over the 12 psi that you may well be restricted to if you don’t use the adj FPR to cure the high rpm leanness first. It does require some fiddling around, but no more than trying to achieve the same results with a Power FC on a manual. It’s just a matter of tuning the right bit first.

Hope that was of some help to fellow auto owners.

Thanks for the advise, Since I dont know much about tuning but have an understanding of what you are talking about, would it be fair to say that when you talk about using a FPR to increase the fuel pressure above say 4000 rpm to get the A/F ratios correct at high boost would it fair to say that you could achieve this also by installing slightly larger injectors then using the SAFCII to adjust the A/F ratios under other operating boost pressures and conditions.

Would this be a better option if you have or are about to install a bigger / higher flowing turbo?

Thanks for the advise, Since I dont know much about tuning but have an understanding of what you are talking about, would it be fair to say that when you talk about using a FPR to increase the fuel pressure above say 4000 rpm to get the A/F ratios correct at high boost would it fair to say that you could achieve this also by installing slightly larger injectors then using the SAFCII to adjust the A/F ratios under other operating boost pressures and conditions.

Would this be a better option if you have or are about to install a bigger / higher flowing turbo?

Disclosure: I used to be a mechanic back in the last century but my hands on experience with RBs is pretty much limited to my S1 Stagea. Whether bigger injectors are indicated for now or later would depend on the duty cycle now - if they are running at only 60- 70% now they should not require replacing. And even if they do or maybe especially if they do you still need to ensure an adequate fuel supply from your fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator. Increased boost will require increased fuel pressure to get the fuel out of the injectors at the required rate.

Disclosure: I used to be a mechanic back in the last century but my hands on experience with RBs is pretty much limited to my S1 Stagea. Whether bigger injectors are indicated for now or later would depend on the duty cycle now - if they are running at only 60- 70% now they should not require replacing. And even if they do or maybe especially if they do you still need to ensure an adequate fuel supply from your fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator. Increased boost will require increased fuel pressure to get the fuel out of the injectors at the required rate.

Cheers, Sounds like the fue pressur regulator is the way to go, Install the SAFC2 and see what the tuner can do.

WIll keep you updated on the progress.

  • 6 months later...
  • 1 year later...
http://www.apexi-usa.com/content/pdf5486.pdf

Apexi AFC NEO lists the M35 VQ25DET Stagea.

I'm sure the SAFCII also works.

I agree if your engine is lean to raise the Fuel pressure then uses your AFC to lean it out...Will keep it away from boost cut as well :P....unless the boost sensor stops the party...in that case put the boost sensor on the wastegate side of you boost controller and it will see less than actual boost.

I put a standard air regulator on my boost sensor so it sees 8psi, I don't know if it helped, but I run 20psi now, no dramas.

The stock ecu does a fine job of keeping the burn stoich, I don't like the idea of just modifying the airflow signal, I much prefer the voltage clamp p1ggyback units use as the low end mapping isn't changed much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...