Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

Do you know whta the problem is with the SAFCII ? Does the standard computer try to over right the settings and take control?

The guys at Unique Autosports tried to fit one to my ARX with no success.

They had previously installed on on my 300zxtt with very positive results.

I'm currently investigating having the chip reprogrammed by Silverwater Automotive Services.

Did the guys at Unique motorsports say what the problem was? The ecu can't really "override the settings" because all the SAFC does is to modify the signal from the AFM thus creating a new reality for the ecu. One downside can be that it alters your timing so they should really be fitted together with an Apexi SITC so that your timing can be fine tuned. I will be fitting both over the weekend together with a wideband sensor and afr meter (LM2) so I can start tuning - although this is on an RB25DET. I don't know how the V6 is different but think the SAFC/SITC should work OK too.

p.s some tuning tips from SK which may or may not be useful to your particular car/engine:

Recently a few guys have been asking me about how to get around the DFA (SAFC) compromise of leaner A/F ratios at high boost and higher rpm and richer A/F ratios during (and sometimes just after) boost build. The problem is if you increase the AFM voltage at higher rpm (to get richer A/F ratios) the standard ECU sees this as increased airflow, which may push it into R&R mapping. Which results in power dips and a lack of response. Sometimes this doesn't show up on the dyno but raises it ugly head when you drive in variable conditions on the road or track.

To fix this “R&R versus too lean at higher boost” problem you have to increase the fuel pressure (via an adjustable fuel pressure regulator). The trick is to increase the fuel pressure just enough to get the A/F ratios to the target (say 12 to 1) in the rpm range that it is currently running too lean (usually above 4,500 rpm).

For adjustable FPR I use the Nismo bolt on style, ~$150 from Nengun.

Set the FPR to give 45psi above boost when boost has stabilised (anything above c3000 rev/min).

Once you get the higher rpm A/F ratios in the range that you want them, you use the DFA (SAFC) to lean it out in the other rpm ranges where it will then be too rich. This (reduced AFM voltage) also helps with preventing the ECU going to R&R, as it uses lower airflow map load points. So you get 2 benefits.

In order to lean out the A/F ratios, the DFA settings are used to reduce the AFM voltage (that the ECU sees), which usually advances the ignition timing. So the SITC is used to retard the ignition timing. This retarding is mostly required at revs over 4,500 rpm. Most times under 4,000 rpm you can sneak in a bit more advance, which improves the response considerably.

If you are using a suitable turbo (eg; GCG ball bearing high flow) the adj FPR, DFA and SITC you should be able to get the boost up to 1 bar, maybe 1.1 bar. That will give you another 30 to 40 kW over the 12 psi that you may well be restricted to if you don’t use the adj FPR to cure the high rpm leanness first. It does require some fiddling around, but no more than trying to achieve the same results with a Power FC on a manual. It’s just a matter of tuning the right bit first.

Hope that was of some help to fellow auto owners.

Did the guys at Unique motorsports say what the problem was? The ecu can't really "override the settings" because all the SAFC does is to modify the signal from the AFM thus creating a new reality for the ecu. One downside can be that it alters your timing so they should really be fitted together with an Apexi SITC so that your timing can be fine tuned. I will be fitting both over the weekend together with a wideband sensor and afr meter (LM2) so I can start tuning - although this is on an RB25DET. I don't know how the V6 is different but think the SAFC/SITC should work OK too.

p.s some tuning tips from SK which may or may not be useful to your particular car/engine:

Recently a few guys have been asking me about how to get around the DFA (SAFC) compromise of leaner A/F ratios at high boost and higher rpm and richer A/F ratios during (and sometimes just after) boost build. The problem is if you increase the AFM voltage at higher rpm (to get richer A/F ratios) the standard ECU sees this as increased airflow, which may push it into R&R mapping. Which results in power dips and a lack of response. Sometimes this doesn't show up on the dyno but raises it ugly head when you drive in variable conditions on the road or track.

To fix this “R&R versus too lean at higher boost” problem you have to increase the fuel pressure (via an adjustable fuel pressure regulator). The trick is to increase the fuel pressure just enough to get the A/F ratios to the target (say 12 to 1) in the rpm range that it is currently running too lean (usually above 4,500 rpm).

For adjustable FPR I use the Nismo bolt on style, ~$150 from Nengun.

Set the FPR to give 45psi above boost when boost has stabilised (anything above c3000 rev/min).

Once you get the higher rpm A/F ratios in the range that you want them, you use the DFA (SAFC) to lean it out in the other rpm ranges where it will then be too rich. This (reduced AFM voltage) also helps with preventing the ECU going to R&R, as it uses lower airflow map load points. So you get 2 benefits.

In order to lean out the A/F ratios, the DFA settings are used to reduce the AFM voltage (that the ECU sees), which usually advances the ignition timing. So the SITC is used to retard the ignition timing. This retarding is mostly required at revs over 4,500 rpm. Most times under 4,000 rpm you can sneak in a bit more advance, which improves the response considerably.

If you are using a suitable turbo (eg; GCG ball bearing high flow) the adj FPR, DFA and SITC you should be able to get the boost up to 1 bar, maybe 1.1 bar. That will give you another 30 to 40 kW over the 12 psi that you may well be restricted to if you don’t use the adj FPR to cure the high rpm leanness first. It does require some fiddling around, but no more than trying to achieve the same results with a Power FC on a manual. It’s just a matter of tuning the right bit first.

Hope that was of some help to fellow auto owners.

Thanks for the advise, Since I dont know much about tuning but have an understanding of what you are talking about, would it be fair to say that when you talk about using a FPR to increase the fuel pressure above say 4000 rpm to get the A/F ratios correct at high boost would it fair to say that you could achieve this also by installing slightly larger injectors then using the SAFCII to adjust the A/F ratios under other operating boost pressures and conditions.

Would this be a better option if you have or are about to install a bigger / higher flowing turbo?

Thanks for the advise, Since I dont know much about tuning but have an understanding of what you are talking about, would it be fair to say that when you talk about using a FPR to increase the fuel pressure above say 4000 rpm to get the A/F ratios correct at high boost would it fair to say that you could achieve this also by installing slightly larger injectors then using the SAFCII to adjust the A/F ratios under other operating boost pressures and conditions.

Would this be a better option if you have or are about to install a bigger / higher flowing turbo?

Disclosure: I used to be a mechanic back in the last century but my hands on experience with RBs is pretty much limited to my S1 Stagea. Whether bigger injectors are indicated for now or later would depend on the duty cycle now - if they are running at only 60- 70% now they should not require replacing. And even if they do or maybe especially if they do you still need to ensure an adequate fuel supply from your fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator. Increased boost will require increased fuel pressure to get the fuel out of the injectors at the required rate.

Disclosure: I used to be a mechanic back in the last century but my hands on experience with RBs is pretty much limited to my S1 Stagea. Whether bigger injectors are indicated for now or later would depend on the duty cycle now - if they are running at only 60- 70% now they should not require replacing. And even if they do or maybe especially if they do you still need to ensure an adequate fuel supply from your fuel pump and fuel pressure regulator. Increased boost will require increased fuel pressure to get the fuel out of the injectors at the required rate.

Cheers, Sounds like the fue pressur regulator is the way to go, Install the SAFC2 and see what the tuner can do.

WIll keep you updated on the progress.

  • 6 months later...
  • 1 year later...
http://www.apexi-usa.com/content/pdf5486.pdf

Apexi AFC NEO lists the M35 VQ25DET Stagea.

I'm sure the SAFCII also works.

I agree if your engine is lean to raise the Fuel pressure then uses your AFC to lean it out...Will keep it away from boost cut as well :P....unless the boost sensor stops the party...in that case put the boost sensor on the wastegate side of you boost controller and it will see less than actual boost.

I put a standard air regulator on my boost sensor so it sees 8psi, I don't know if it helped, but I run 20psi now, no dramas.

The stock ecu does a fine job of keeping the burn stoich, I don't like the idea of just modifying the airflow signal, I much prefer the voltage clamp p1ggyback units use as the low end mapping isn't changed much.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yuck. But it's kinda the same principle, moving timing around to make car run bad but sound good.... I went for a more spirited tuning drive to iron out a few things. Car no longer stalls, and it loved to dip RPM low when you clutch in. After tuning this (and the 4-5 tables that HPTuners/LS1 OEM ECU wants for idle air correction) it's now behaving somewhat normal. All expected because there's a new TB, new Intake manifold and that new TB which is 102mm vs 78... has an entirely different IAC passage which is smaller because ????? Unfortunately at this point I went to make further fine tuning changes to avoid it flaring up, you know... _tuning_ the HPTuners dongle died. Well to be more accurate - The USB cable died in a fashion that anyone who has ever charged a phone will recognize. After the app demanding I resync it 50 or so times (which all 'succeeded' but all failed) the device does not want to sync and I've logged a ticket with support to see if it's fixable. US Support said it was a 'storage issue' but after removing the SD card inside it and formatting it/fixing it the issue does persist. Unfortunately usually the fix is "Turn in your old dongle and pay $700 for the upgraded one" it's cheaper because I get some free licence credits I unfortunately don't need. However I'm 10 minutes down the road from HP Tuners AUS/VCM so at least I won't need to post it, and logged a new ticket for support over here. Definitely drives different. My SOTP dyno believes it's probably making 310-320kw instead of the 280 before.  It scrambles for traction a little now whereas it previously different. It drives like a bigger cam car up top even though the cam is smaller, likely due to the cam not being advanced 6 degrees. The timing is deliberately low and the fuel is very rich so who knows if this will improve on the dyno. It may, imperceptably. Also funny is removing the pineapples definitely makes the car squat more and axle tramp less. So this behavior of having more top end, squatting more, and scrabbling for traction more makes me think = more power. But I could have just been sitting on the threshold of that kind of behavior before. Time will tell if my butt dyno is calibrated right. I need the exhaust leaks fixed before dyno tune for obvious AFR related reasons - I repositioned the pipes but I'm not confident it's fully sealed even if it is better. At least the car does drive around while I cannot tweak/tune it for now. And I have aircon again. medium success!
    • Don't use that manifold. Please don't use that manifold. Sunk cost fallacy is not worth the later pain. None of these will be relevant to the change that will come from the different turbo and manifold. As in, the effect of the exhaust will be nil, regardless of what else is changed. And all the cam and fuel system stuff is not changing either way, so has no effect. The turbo and manifold (and to a small extent the wastegate)....big change.
    • Just wanted to say thank you for your input   my man (lead mechanic by trade) and I have done a heap of work as you can imagine just to make the hot side work with the dump pipe, stupid massive intake on turbo, trying to get the waste gate on was not fun.  I’m kinda getting to the point where I don’t know if I try and make this work and not throw all this cash and time away or do I scrap the lot and start again? the Apexi I’ve got was tuned for a few slight differences:   Tomei pon cams (mine are stock neo) Turbo smart 38mm external waste gate (mines 45mm replumbed) with stainless screamer pipe  3inch turbo back exhaust with high flow cat Sard 800cc top feed injectors Sard adjustable fuel pressure reg    
    • Out here E90s are the cheapest way into a sporty-ish car because everyone knows just how expensive the repairs can get. 8-10k USD for an automatic 335i. 
×
×
  • Create New...