Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Its that time of the year again, when our friends at Repco bring out their performance guide, and that means everyone gets a chance to have their car sparkle on the front cover of a publication going out to 30,000. If you win the comp, Repco will organise for a photoshoot and interview for the editorial, as well as a $2000 gift card.

This year the competition has gone digital, in the form of a voting site where anyone can make a personal profile of their car complete with images and detailed descriptions of the work they have done. Once you have your profile up and looking good its just a matter of sitting back and waiting for the votes to come rolling in. Visitors to the site can browse through each profile and when they find a worthy vehicle register their support in the form of a vote. Visitors can vote for as many cars as they want but only once for each car.

check it out at www.performancerepco.com.au

Don't not let another commodore win, it would be great to see a skyline there.

post-6492-1224040289_thumb.jpg

I just voted for your car Johnny. Hope u win!

Thanks man :D

voted for johnny too.

Wonder why no one had voted for the red commonwhore :(

:O

I cant believe the commodore is beating me!!! Dont worry skylinesaustralia were gonna have a comeback!!! SAU.....SAU

Catching up to ya there Johnny :) everyone vote for all the Skylines - SAU repping!

U got my vote mate

Would be sick for SAU if one of us wins; publicity would be mad!!!

Nice GTR Johnny, you got my vote champ.

Thanks man ;)

  • 1 month later...

My son entered my R32, which is about to become his this Christmas if he gets good marks for his end of year exams.

We are at number 4 atm, it would be great if the forum got behind him or another members car and got a GTR on the cover.

http://www.performancerepco.com.au/index.p...&entryid=65

We are sitting on 642 votes ATM.

Thanks all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was once told, who it was I'm to old to remember, that the length of the OEM wheels brace supplied with a vehicle is designed long enough for a average person to apply enough torque to do up, and undo the wheel nuts to the specified torque  What a average person is is anyone's guess though, i.e. average fat bastard, average knuckle head, average perfect sized human......like me Unless of course, a tyre shop has ugga dugga'd them up to "torque to yeild/strip" specs, used cross threading as natures lock tight, or a big breaker bar was used to tighten them up to get some nice stretch in the poor old wheel studs Me, I torque wheel nuts to 1 elbow joint click, lower torque settings are based of wrist clicks, higher torque settings are based of shoulder clunks, or total dislocation for anything that requires all of the torques 
    • I think the catch can design is pretty flawed. Evident in the fact that the V2 one moved to a larger top mounted filter which alone would have helped with overflow and reduce restrictions compared with the side filter. I also imagine there was a major improvement to the baffling design. It is worth mentioning that this catch can with the RB20 was never as much of an issue and the high kms RB25 is likely a part of the problem. I have gotten quotes for both a new "Vibrant Gen 3" catch can and to modify this existing ones but that may have to wait until after the track day. I hope the sump/head breathers/drains and cam splash plates will be enough
    • Yep, both. The ratio is 1.8 instead of OEM being 1.7. The rocker bodies are modified with a larger bolt hole and re-threaded with 10mm holes instead of the 8mm YT has stock. Finding out they don't actually fit the stock castings cause a lot of un-impressment by the person in the USA who tapped the new holes for the 'upgraded' YT product. He was very unhappy with them given their previous design did not require 'clearancing'
    • That too, but I think this is why she's put the work into the cam cover baffles. I mean, a catch can should only need to be a catch can, not an oil air separator also. Not to say that putting the effort into having it do a better job of oil-air sep is a waste of time, but doing the sep earlier is always going to make life better. And that should happen now anyway.
    • I think both. Higher ratio and more stout. I think at least part of his lift increase came from the rocker.
×
×
  • Create New...