Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

main concern with s-hook style fasteners is in the case of an accident, which we hope never happens, the s-hook open up and you loose the load, sometimes off the trailer and onto the tow-car. i have personally seen this happen. I have been useing 2500kg ratchet straps with the ends that clip over themselves for years and havent had any issues. Usually use a safety strap also incase the car tries to come off the back.

Hook and keeper or s-hook ratchets and why?

My tie down points (eye bolts) are suited nicely for s-hook but not at all for hook and keeper style ratchets. I could use a d-shackle to make it ideal but I see plenty of s-hook style ratchets that are easily rated above what I need.

  • Replies 435
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

If you tie the car down correctly using the S hook style ratchet straps then in case of accident you shouldn't have a real problem, since the car should be tied down front and back there should never be enough slack for the hooks to open up.

Of course if the accident is serious enough to move the car that violently then I would guess no matter what is holding your car down it will bend/break or whatever you attached it to on the car will bend/break.

As a rule for safely tying things down we (Army) use a % of the cars weight to determine what is needed to tie it down, and that is:

80% front movement

50% rear movement

20% side movement

Now front movement means the straps holding it from going forward (for those not to sure) and rear and sides are self explaining. Side movement can be alleviated by tying the car down at angles, ie: going through the standard tow hooks and out at 45 deg to the front/rear of the trailer :)BUT! if you tie it down this way you have to add the percentages together since you are putting more stress on the straps this way :P

Most importantly don't forget to check over your straps often, its a very quick check to see that the sides aren't fraying, if they are and you keep using them to tie things down then you run the risk of having them tear right through and you lose your load :P

Happy towing!

Edited by mitch_SR32

So if the vehicle is 1000kg you would use 2x 800kg straps (or 2x 400kg = 800kg straps?) tieing down the back to stop forward movement?

I'm not really worried about the capacity of the straps as for anything with a decent quality ratchet they are all 2500kg.

If you use 2x 400kg straps to tie down the rear it won't be enough according to another rule which I forgot to mention:

When tying something down you have to assume that at any given time only 1 out of 2 or 2 out of 4 straps can end up taking all the load. Of course if you use the same strap to go through 2 points this is ok too, so long as both sides are made tight when you ratchet it down :) Here I am talking about hooking the strap at one corner of the trailer, running it through the 2 tow hooks (or whatever you use) and out to the other corner of the trailer.

Using the % method above with a vehicle weighing 1000kg, you would use as a BARE MINIMUM:

800kg straps to tie down from the rear

500kg from the front

200kg from the side

But as you said, if you use a 2500kg strap then that is overkill for any track car, so I always tell people to go for something like this if they are in doubt. There is no point running on the edge of your strap capacity. :)

Just personally, I am really not a fan of wheel straps since they do nothing to keep the body from moving on the suspension while the rims are held firm to the deck, which can get very annoying to drive with sometimes.

Edited by mitch_SR32

I bougt this little Atlas 200 about a year ago and it's not bad, just slow on the hiway. I might put a VH45 auto in it. If I do that i will rebuild most of the enclosed part of the tray into a motorhome and build an enclosed 5th wheel style trailer. These are the only pics which are from the day it came home. I am remaking the tray at the moment so the top can be a track side Grandstand (esp good for events like Gatton) and the sides are the same as a toughtliner that can be tented out to make a pitbay with shade. Funny thou, Im not sure I realy want to keep it. will have to take some new pics some time.

IM000993.jpg

IM000990.jpg

IM000994.jpg

sweet rig. :blink: now I want someone to buy my atlas and do similar with it. it's a bit newer than yours, but probably pretty similar. (well except for the alloy pantec vs ramps etc).

I've been trying to flog it for months now. at this rate I'll be lucky to get $18K for it. and it's like brand new... :blush: so if anyone needs a truck, give me a hoy.

post-3621-1231133726_thumb.jpg

post-3621-1231133750_thumb.jpg

That's some pretty damn smart stuff you posted Mitch. After watching some guy's tie their race cars down maybe I should print it out and hand it out.

I use 2000kg straps to all 4 wheels but I have no choice,,,got nowhere else to tie down. Besides my car weighs 500 kilo's wringing wet.

On long hauls I also chain the car front and rear on it's tow hooks,,,not tight but with very little movement.

Neil.

Thanks, (although honestly it's the tip of the iceberg, I kept it as simple as I could since we are talking small loads) going through the wheels doesn't hurt it, it just means you have some body roll on the trailer. Since race cars are usually stiff this isn't a real problem.

I should hope I know what I am on about after 5 years in the Army recovering any number of broken things onto trailers and tying them down for some very long rides :rofl: And yeah, some of things I see tied down around town and at race meets just makes me cringe!

Edited by mitch_SR32
Thanks, (although honestly it's the tip of the iceberg, I kept it as simple as I could since we are talking small loads) going through the wheels doesn't hurt it, it just means you have some body roll on the trailer. Since race cars are usually stiff this isn't a real problem.

I should hope I know what I am on about after 5 years in the Army recovering any number of broken things onto trailers and tying them down for some very long rides :rofl: And yeah, some of things I see tied down around town and at race meets just makes me cringe!

This is one reason I started this thread in the 1st place. I wanted to see what other guys do and get great tech posts like you have. Nothing like talking to an expert.

I remember a story about Victor Brays door-slammer not tied down properly coming back from WA one year and it copped a real beating bouncing around in their trailer across the nullabor.

I'm not real happy with the way my car ties down as I have to use the centre of my wheels and that can't be good for my wheel alignment.

Duncan pretty pic on page 4 is what i think is right but I don't have the room.

Neil.

Expert... :rofl:

Well I wouldn't quite say that but I do get paid a fair bit to know these things, its a definite advantage considering I had to move my own car by trailer twice in the last week.

If anyone has any other questions past what I have already posted fire away, either by PM or in here which is probably best so hopefully I can give an answer everyone can use :banana:

Edited by mitch_SR32

yeah correct hook up is paramount we have done over 150,000kms towing in the past 19 months, and in 3 and a half years the race trailer and poor old GU patrol (second engine :cheers: ) have done 210,000kms going to and from DA, G1, initial drift and general sprint days at wakefield, winton etc.

i prefer to hook the rear via the K FRAME (just behind lower arms see pics) in a"X" pattern and the same on the front tow hooks, i personally NEVER hook throught the wheels on anything that is worth a damn as it stresses suspension mounting points and effects wheel alignment especially after long trips.

We had the trailer made to make it easy to load, one of the highest priorities was no removal of bumpers to load, low tyre racks, lowered hieght to keep it under the GU's roofline (fuel efficiency), lightweight as possible, dual spares and longest ramps possible.

post-34927-1231197888_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1231197901_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1231198205_thumb.jpg

post-34927-1231198214_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS

K frame is not an ideal tie down point. You really want to use unsprung components. The movement of fully sprung components will be continually slackening and then shock loading the straps as they tighten... worst case scenario for snapping a tie down, and at very least can loosen them. The only way your wheel alignment can change by tieing down to suspension members or wheels is by bending something - and that's only likely to happen in an accident.

also take issue with the 80% of body weight for front movement idea. That will be fine if an accident would only pull 0.8G in a front on accident, but that's not realistic. You want gear with SWL at least 2 times the weight (200%) of the vehicle.

I use a big f**koff chain on the rear with rated shackles to an unsprung component, or at least the outer end on a semi-sprung component like a suspension arm. Handily my race cars are typically Datsuns with live axle rear ends so I just loop around the diff housing. Then tension that forward with ratchet straps around the front wheels (never had any wheel alignment problems towing up to 1200km at a time interstate) and add an untensioned safety chain around the front x-member too.

Edited by hrd-hr30
K frame is not an ideal tie down point. You really want to use unsprung components. The movement of fully sprung components will be continually slackening and then shock loading the straps as they tighten...

hence the fact you tie it in an x pattern to the rear and front of the trailer... not directley down. On a std car it may be an issue but we are talking race cars and in 10 odd years have never had a tie down break even in the unfortunate event of the car collecting a roo and leaving the road, trailer (previous setup, and years ago) bounced a mutitude of trees.... :cheers:

At the end of the day it is really personal prefference.

we tend to tow looong distances and find the trailer is heaps more stable at high speed (crossing the nullarbor and centre) if the cars is unable to bounce around on its suspension.... same principle as transporting trail and dirt bikes.

quick note to to those who tow cars with wings MAKE SURE YOU SET IT FLAT as it makes a HUGE difference to fuel economy and speed.

Edited by URAS
K frame is not an ideal tie down point. You really want to use unsprung components. The movement of fully sprung components will be continually slackening and then shock loading the straps as they tighten... worst case scenario for snapping a tie down, and at very least can loosen them. The only way your wheel alignment can change by tieing down to suspension members or wheels is by bending something - and that's only likely to happen in an accident.

also take issue with the 80% of body weight for front movement idea. That will be fine if an accident would only pull 0.8G in a front on accident, but that's not realistic. You want gear with SWL at least 2 times the weight (200%) of the vehicle.

I use a big f**koff chain on the rear with rated shackles to an unsprung component, or at least the outer end on a semi-sprung component like a suspension arm. Handily my race cars are typically Datsuns with live axle rear ends so I just loop around the diff housing. Then tension that forward with ratchet straps around the front wheels (never had any wheel alignment problems towing up to 1200km at a time interstate) and add an untensioned safety chain around the front x-member too.

1: Going from the K-frame is not a problem because it is an unsprung part of the car, the only place you should never ever tie down from is axles. No violent movement is going to occur if you have tightened it properly.

2: Where are you getting this 200% figure from? because if its simply based on an accident then I can tell you what will happen right now:

- The chain you are using will be fine since you factored it in for this big accident but its not immune to stretching either

- It will bend/break whatever you tied it to on the trailer AND the car since these aren't rated for this accident

- There is really no way to work out how to tie something down to save it from damage in an accident, hence why I doubt you will find anyone that can tell you how to tie something down with enough force (while not bending anything) to keep it stable in an accident

we tend to tow looong distances and find the trailer is heaps more stable at high speed if the cars is unable to bounce around on its suspension.... same principle as transporting trail and dirt bikes.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This :D

What is happening there is you don't have a constant shift in the CG (center of gravity) which can feel like the trailer is putting the brakes on as you drive.

Edited by mitch_SR32

One more thing, because I know a LOT of people don't do this and it can save you from losing your car clean off your trailer even while just cruising on the highways.

CHECK YOUR TIE DOWNS!

You should after tying it down check them at 3 key intervals:

200m after moving off (if the straps aren't on properly most of the movement is likely to happen in this short space, I personally have had to rip everything off and start again due to movement in this short distance)

3-5km after moving off (if you did it right on the first check then this should be a quick tighten or nothing at all)

Every time you stop after that (you are already stopped so what is hard about checking your car again)

The last step is something I see a lot of, people walk around to find straps loose or about to come off and say "jeez lucky I pulled over when I did". Don't be that person :D

1: Going from the K-frame is not a problem because it is an unsprung part of the car, the only place you should never ever tie down from is axles. No violent movement is going to occur if you have tightened it properly.

K frame is mounted to the body - its a fully sprung component.

tieing down from fully sprung components means if the car's suspension compresses slightly when you hit a bump, the tie down goes slack and then the car's suspension rebounds and shock loads the restraint. A loosening restraint also allows the load to move. Tieing down from unsprung components which stay perfectly still in relation to the trailer keeps constant tension on the load you are trying to restrain. That has to be the best way to go.

2: Where are you getting this 200% figure from? because if its simply based on an accident then I can tell you what will happen right now:

- The chain you are using will be fine since you factored it in for this big accident but its not immune to stretching either

- It will bend/break whatever you tied it to on the trailer AND the car since these aren't rated for this accident

- There is really no way to work out how to tie something down to save it from damage in an accident, hence why I doubt you will find anyone that can tell you how to tie something down with enough force (while not bending anything) to keep it stable in an accident

the 200% figure was just plucked out of the air. But the idea is to allow a safety margin rather than just speccing them to 8 tenths of the weight they're trying to secure. for example, my old U2L IPRA race car weighed 851kg - your 8/10s rule of thumb whould mean all I need is a single strap rated to 680kg! I use two 800kg straps to tension the front and prevent the load moving rearwards, wheras with your system all i need is two 200kg straps. may as well use Telstra rope!

I don't know what kind of G force a loaded trailer/4WD combo can pull under an emergency braking situation - maybe .5 to .6G?? Passenger vehicles can do .8 to .9G if I recall the wheels/motor tests correctly, so .6G is 50% less braking force than that which is probably realistic enough. There goes 3/4 of your SWL (safe working load) just in braking alone - not much margin for safety left, is there? I'll continue to err on the side of caution. It may be uneccesary/overkill, but it just has to be safer than strap only rated to 8 tenths of the load its trying to hold.

And yes, if there is a crash and parts of the trailer or car that the restraints are connected to bend, I'm fine with that - its much better than the alternative of the restraint breaking and the load flying off to cause more damage. Even if it still didn't hold, it has to absorb more energy before something breaks.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...