Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok so its a known fact from a past thread that....

BP 98 is the only 98 Octane fuel that is refined to 98 Octane and not refined to 92 or 95 and then boosted by additives.

Caltex Vortex, Shell Optimax and all that other shit is just normal fuel on steroids which in turn means the fuel is less dense and is less economical whilst giving similar performance.

Just buy BP 98 and you will be using the best.

I fang a bottle of pro strength booster into a 3/4 tank of 98 every now and then and I feel a decent increase again. You will notice a better improvement with an octane booster on BP 98 as well.

ive been comparing V power Shell vs Vortex Caltex. noticed better economy with v power. even with a week of spirited driving i returned 12.8km/100 vs ~13.5km/100 on Caltex

Been getting the same results . Vpower has done wonders. Better fuel economy, more responsive and less detonation

Bp is also the bees knees. No critisms of it either.

Edit: Actually, after reading the remaining post, i believe it Just depends on your tune. Mine was with Vpower so go figure I get the best result with shell.

Edited by wedge_r34gtr
  • 5 years later...

Between dyno trials, drive feel and also inspections after running on an old carby powered engine in a separate vehicle ..

Found that for us, Mobil 98RON has always out performed the shell, bp and vortex.

Each to their own with your preferences of course..

But the Mobil fuel has been great. ( now 7 eleven)

Nothing to do with 98RON (off topic!), but back to back driving Sydney to Kiama and back in my R31 with Shell 91RON and Mobil 91RON, Mobil gave me extra 50km hahaha (45L).

I put 20L Caltex 91RON in it once (E10 unfortunately) and the R31 would stall/run rough in cold start. It didn't like BP 91 (E10, ran a bit rough) but liked Mobil E10 (no difference between Mobil 91 and E10, I still wouldn't put E10 in such an old car).

I've put only 98 Mobil in my cars ever since lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
    • Well, do ya, punk? Seriously though, let's fu<king go! The colour and kit looks amazing on the car. Do you have any shots from the rear? I don't quite follow how the model came around. You bought the white kit and he modified it to match your car? Looks nuts either way!
×
×
  • Create New...