Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys have found what turbo i want for my rb20 but there are 3 differant types of the 8cm exhaust housing one, they are:

TD06S-20G 8cm

TD06S L2-20G 8cm

TD06SH-20G 8cm

Going too be buying one soon and would like to know the differances, names of the turbos were taken off the greddy website...

Greddy Wedsite

Thanks Luke

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242126-td06-20g-differances/
Share on other sites

TD06S-20G 8cm

TD06S L2-20G 8cm

TD06SH-20G 8cm

Basically the TD part is the turbine, the 20# is the compressor

So the TD06SL2 has a different exhaust wheel to the TD06S, from the dyno sheets i have seen there is no difference in response or power. The TD06SH is bigger again and would most certainly be laggier as it is the exhaust wheel used on the T67-25G and TD06SH-25G

Yes the nice Trust spec turbine is the "TD06 SL-2" version . More open blades and I think from memory 11 blades rather than 12 . It's actually slightly smaller in diameter than garden variety TD06 turbines but works quite well for its size .

Mobs here in Australia can build you turbos based on that turbine , GT Pumps is one . They also usually stock the three trim sizes of that compressor family - 16/18/20G . Don't quote me but TD05/6 may be based on the same center section .

The main challenge , as always , is getting the flange to suit your exhaust manifold . Trust Greddy sometimes use a 3 hole pattern but I'm sure I've seen Mitsy (MHI) turbine housings with T3 sized mounting flanges on them .

Whats the bite for a Trust TD06xx these days ?

A .

L2 is the pick of the bunch....it is the turbine that comes in the Greddy kit :laugh:

Have you seen a straight TD06 vs the TD06SL2 comparison? Interesting to read if others experiences vary.

I dont think there is really much in it. vsute has an R32 GTSt that is near identical to mine. Same ECU, same injectors, same tuner, same dyno and both completely std RB20s with cam gears. Our graphs are identical except for the fact our cars run different diam tyres so the dyno sheets look identical only just offset from one another.

He runs the L2 i run the norm TD06, i dont think its even a TD06S, well not according to the tag on the compressor cover. So i wouldnt lose any sleep over makign sure its an L2 version.

I know its only one expample, but its a pretty controlled example. Our cars made within 2kws of each other at the same boost level.

260rwkws at 18-19psi. I have run 22psi in it, but i dont think there is much more power in it. Shit load more midrange, but ultimately about the same top end power

gallery_462_50_59282.jpg

The red line was with some cams i tried, the amount of ignition we were able to wind into the engine suggested that the cams were simply too big for the little RB20 with a small TD06 8cm on it. Cams were Apexi 260/8.8mm

The std cams work pretty well, with over 240rwkws from 130km/h to 185km/h

I have no idea. The workshop i use for tuning is doing something right as he gets great results out of std cams. My car was on Dr Drifts dyno and i think it made 20rwkws more then any other std cam RB20 he had run before. Not sure if it was 20rwkws, but was soemthing like that. That was almost 2 years ago so he may have seen some more decent RB20s come through the workshop.

But i have to say if i was going to try cams it would be the Tomei 256 jobbies. Some also have good results with the HKS, but i just sold my set as i was not willing to spend the dollars experimenting when what i have already works well enough for me.

LOL, did i ramble enough? :) Real answer is fark knows :) It woudl be interesting to see you do a proper before/after comparison on the same dyno and same tuner. It seems Dr Drift got good reslts with the Tomei....but more cars getting the same result would be nice :)

Have you seen a straight TD06 vs the TD06SL2 comparison? Interesting to read if others experiences vary.

I say its the pick of the bunch because you get the L2 with the manifold pipes etc etc for the RB20.

I have seen greddy kits come with turbos not specified for the kit, however, trust seemed reluctant to do such a thing.

However, yes looking at the specs on the turbos from greddy they are a much of a muchness. :ermm:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...