Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've been doing a bit of research on twin turbo upgrades on the RB26, but now decided to go single. :)

So I'm just wondering what is the most cost effective (also reliable) way to go about it and how much roughly it is going to cost.

Aim is around 300awkw since the engine is still stock and only has cat back, ebc, new nismo fuel pump.

So I assume I still need the following.

- Turbo (which one?) Garrett equivalent of HKS and alike

- Manifold (which one?) and is there such a thing as a single low mount for the rb26?

- Dump and front pipe (which one) + high flow cat

- Nismo 740cc (I like a bit of headroom)

- Power FC

- Cam and Cam gear? (is it ideal to upgrade it?)

- External gate? (do I need it?)

- Other bits (turbo bag, heat wrap...etc)

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/242382-single-turbo-upgrade-to-~300awkw/
Share on other sites

Rob why would you do that over a twin system for that amount of output. Just to change the manifolds, oil and water lines, exhaust, external waste gate going to cost a lot more than 2 replacement garrets or such.

You could just bolt on some 2860-5, Power FC, adjustable cam gears, decent tune and you will make that number or get close with a stock engine. Then again i am sure you have your reasons and if you have the cash mate fill ya boots.

mainly just after the simplicity of the single and I also read that it can just as, if not more responsive than the twin setup.

Since i'm going to get new dump/front, and everything else anyway. So I thought I might as well go single.

theoretically... 2 twins will spool quicker than a large single of same power...

thats just physics.. but that doesnt mean that big singles r ghey...

if u want a single, go nuts man :) 300awkw only?? GT35R will do it sleeping

Im thinking along the same lines as you mate; clean and simple to work on etc

str8180 or something; he's a member has an r32 gtr with a 3540 and making over 300awkw, hes described the response as almost stock which is a very good thing.

but i think he has a custom exhaust housing .72 ???

theoretically... 2 twins will spool quicker than a large single of same power...

thats just physics.. but that doesnt mean that big singles r ghey...

I think that the two twins spooling faster (depending on the circumstances) is a bit of a farce but with stock upgrades I reckon it has an element of truth.

If you really want a big single, a .82a/r GT3582R would probably be the most logical. They will break 300kw without thinking about it and will give you a lot of headroom for going further.

N1 block or not.. it will be fine with 300awkw

mines not an n1 block and im chasing way more then that without any problems.. its all in the prep work :P

And that deal with twins spoolin faster is true. its physics.

2 smaller masses is easier to spool than 1 larger mass. needs less energy to turn them. but like i said, that doesnt mean u cant get a single to go just as good as twins

they both have pros n cons.

N1 block or not.. it will be fine with 300awkw

mines not an n1 block and im chasing way more then that without any problems.. its all in the prep work :P

And that deal with twins spoolin faster is true. its physics.

2 smaller masses is easier to spool than 1 larger mass. needs less energy to turn them. but like i said, that doesnt mean u cant get a single to go just as good as twins

they both have pros n cons.

wrong, stock blocks are known to split with around 300rwkw... want proof? i have one at home

yours also wrong in regards to the twins, it has been shown that even a t04z well set up will have less lagg than garrett replacement twins...

if 300rwkw is your goal i suggest a garrett 3076r or 3082r with a 0.8ish bum on a 6-boost manifold

need proof?? dude ive got a stock block...

made 300awkw no problems which more power than what urs made...

plus theres plenty more out there makin tons more

as for proof on twins.. its physics.. so unless u can break the laws of physics which u cant, then stfu

as for proof on twins.. its physics.. so unless u can break the laws of physics which u cant, then stfu

Can you outline which laws of physics dictate that two masses can spin up faster than one for us a bit challenged on that front if you are going to be so abrasive about it?

Im thinking along the same lines as you mate; clean and simple to work on etc

str8180 or something; he's a member has an r32 gtr with a 3540 and making over 300awkw, hes described the response as almost stock which is a very good thing.

but i think he has a custom exhaust housing .72 ???

Str8e180 had a twin scroll .78 ATP housing on his GT35 with one of his own divided manifolds. From memory it ended spitting out around 380rwkw.

I think one of the main reasons behind not many people going the smallish/mid single when aiming for 300-350kw is that it is so easily done with twins. That being said, a single pumping out those figures would be awesome, it would more efficient than twins, and that is not physics its fluid dynamics and heat transfer!

I want someone to do it already so they can be a test mule for others.

Mike

I think one of the main reasons behind not many people going the smallish/mid single when aiming for 300-350kw is that it is so easily done with twins. That being said, a single pumping out those figures would be awesome, it would more efficient than twins, and that is not physics its fluid dynamics and heat transfer!

YES!!! :laugh:

I want someone to do it already so they can be a test mule for others.

Heaps of people have done this kind of thing. Supras and "GTS" Skylines have been doing it with success for years, its the first things lots of Supra guys go for first.

IE, Typical cheap Supra mods = make turbos non sequential (like GTRS), they end up more laggy but make more power. Put a GT3582R on there and make even more power with the same or less lag...

Yeah, I would love to see it set up sweet on a GTR though. In the states ATP and Full-race do split pulse housings for the GT30 series of turbines, I am pretty sure. Definately interesting and a great option in my opinion.

Mike

Power delivery of twins is just that little bit more progressive.

Response once up - response is going from zero throttle to all throttle on corner exit.

Why.. The turbo's sit closer to the ports and good old inertia. Its simply easier to start spinning a smaller wheel than it is a larger one.

At a higher rpm where there's no lack of exhaust gas throttle response on corner exit etc is improved as the turbo's are easier to start spinning/moving.. :laugh:

Mr Lith.. The reason supra guys go for big singles is its cheaper and easier to package than a pair of monster twins that are 450+rwkw capable.

---

Up to 350-400rwkw a pair of twins is far easier. :sick:

Power delivery of twins is just that little bit more progressive.

Response once up - response is going from zero throttle to all throttle on corner exit.

Why.. The turbo's sit closer to the ports and good old inertia. Its simply easier to start spinning a smaller wheel than it is a larger one.

At a higher rpm where there's no lack of exhaust gas throttle response on corner exit etc is improved as the turbo's are easier to start spinning/moving.. :laugh:

Mr Lith.. The reason supra guys go for big singles is its cheaper and easier to package than a pair of monster twins that are 450+rwkw capable.

---

Up to 350-400rwkw a pair of twins is far easier. :sick:

Easier, maybe. Not to work on that is for sure. But, cheaper, definitely! Everyone loves stuff that is cheap and good, I know I do.

Don't forget, you are spinning a smaller wheel yes, but, with only 3 cylinders.

Mike

Ahh yes 3cylinders. From what I've seen parallel twins tend to make their peak boost just that bit later than a similar sized big single. i.e GT30r .7a/r rear on an rb25 to a pair of GT2510's on a 26.

Up in the higher rpm's where the lack of exhaust gas is not an issue it all comes down to the intertia/weight of the wheels ability to accelerate faster.

:laugh:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm tired. I'm tired because about 4PM yesterday, before today's appointment someone immediately bought my bumper. They couldn't get it any other day as they're on the way back to NSW. So I had to do that big GTR conversion I had been planning. Unfortunately, the information on SAU about what you need and how this is done is incomplete. So what should be a simple bolt on affair, yeah, it's not. Did you know if you use all GTR items the bonnet won't close? This little manuever sent me into about 1am the night before trying to dodge a way to get it closed. I will have to revisit this in the next few days  - or maybe not, I may let a body shop figure it out. It all needs to come up and my motivation to pull the bumper off is low. It also seems to hit things in the bay where the GTT bonnet didn't. Yes I used 100% new OEM GTR items. Today, I had the joy of driving to the dyno looking like this: Given I had roughed in the fuel and given sensible but pretty conservative timing, I didn't really bet on having the car drive out any real difference than when it drove in. Sadly due to a miscommunication and laptop fun and games (and almost bricking the dongle, prayers and firmware updates indeed), I ended up using HP Tuner credits to licence the car that was already licenced. So in the end my laptop was used. It turns out my butt dyno is still well calibrated after all this time. The 325kw was on 74% Ethanol, the 313kw line was on 98. The other line is the 'before' line which was 281kw. While the numbers are pretty low, they're pretty in line with what you'd expect. Even if US dynos bump the whole result up about 50KW, gaining 10-15% is similar gains.  The curve of the cam is pretty much spot on with what was discussed as well. All this said, it still feels bad to not see the number you secretly want to see. Even if the car drove great beforehand, and I knew pretty confidently the car would drive out much the same way it drove in due to the nature of a wellish dialled in LS1 not gaining much if anything at all from being tuned from where it was. As expected, the car isn't particularly sensitive to running it at anywhere between 12.0 and 13.0 - And the initial timing at 20deg and 12.0 made 308KW. So 3 degrees of timing, and leaning it out to 12.7 for 5kw, anything above stopped giving any benefit until E85 (which has an additional 2 deg as before). Car itself behaved entirely fine. I found out that 100C = 1.15V! IAT at about 7pm was 19C. I might mess with the bonnet mounting.. but given the REO NEEDS TO BE CHOPPED TO FIT A GTR BAR this is possibly something I may leave gathering (more) dust until it returns to paint jail.
    • It sounds farrrrrrr too cold at your place Duncan... Here I was thinking our 10 degrees overnight is getting cold...
    • oh yeah, reminded this morning....bin lids frozen shut too
    • In my case not, because of total reno. But yeah.
    • Did you use an electronic speedo drive? Does you speedometer read all the way to 180km?
×
×
  • Create New...