Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Up in the higher rpm's where the lack of exhaust gas is not an issue it all comes down to the intertia/weight of the wheels ability to accelerate faster.

Yes but the same can be said for a single at higher rpm where you have double the flow rate of gasses to accerate larger wheel. Note I said a larger wheel and not a wheel, double the size. Personally, I am not fussed either route to make 300-350kw I just want to take which ever route is better (in the future some time), from an efficiency stand point.

To me, a single eliminates trying to merge high velocity gas streams (and if you have seen what it looks like in slow motion using fluid mechanics techniques you will cringe), elimates heat transfer from the front turbo to the inlet of the rear, gets rid of pressure losses from extra piping and is not so crammed especially when you have big ham fists like me.

Who started this thread? Man, just go the small single!

Mike

There must be some credit to using the twin route as Nissan would not have wasted countless $$ on doing so.

My own experience with two similar sized setups the twins did make their peak boost 'slightly' later, came on smoother BUT had noticeably improved response when going from zero throttle to full throttle once over 4000rpm.

There must be some credit to using the twin route as Nissan would not have wasted countless $$ on doing so.

My own experience with two similar sized setups the twins did make their peak boost 'slightly' later, came on smoother BUT had noticeably improved response when going from zero throttle to full throttle once over 4000rpm.

Whether countless $'s were spent or not, no one can confirm that. Yes there are reasons, one may be for marketing purposes, probably among other geniune reasons (from a performance/efficiency standpoint), but there are obvious disadvantages in comparison with a well designed single set up.

Anyway, Cubes it is good people can discuss things like this without getting personal and/or frustrated and say something stupid. So thanks mate. Are you an Adelaide boy? Might see you around.

Mike

Its all good Mike.

Adelaide I am.

Keep an eye out for a stock black R32, near stock ride hight stock wheels with a little 3" tip poking out the rear with a exh. note not quite right. :)

---

Going to single.. Additional cost of a nice exh manifold, ext. gate, new dump pipe and new inlet and IC piping. It would add up fairly quick. Definitely not worth the hassle for under under 360ish rwkw.

Trust greddy make that cool intake adaptor for 2 AFM's in polished s/s for a couple of hundred.

kits from hks etc are like 4500-5000 with everything; yen plummet makes it a tad more expensive.

I was sooooo keen on a single t04z but i keep reading horror stories from EPA which would make my life hell when there is a big huffer in full view of the police.

Its all good Mike.

Adelaide I am.

Keep an eye out for a stock black R32, near stock ride hight stock wheels with a little 3" tip poking out the rear with a exh. note not quite right. :)

---

Going to single.. Additional cost of a nice exh manifold, ext. gate, new dump pipe and new inlet and IC piping. It would add up fairly quick. Definitely not worth the hassle for under under 360ish rwkw.

Will do man, if you see a stock looking wine red R33 GTR Vspec that is me.

I agree with your last statement too!

^^ I've twins are better than that with the same power :wave:

But then someone could probably bring a better single graph and so the story goes

I agree with Cubes for the most part on the points... although the -5's are now making nearly 400rwkw now... so i'd say revise 360rwkw with 400rwkw :ermm:

The twins are only about $500-$600 more expensive than a single Garrett (which is pretty interesting)

But the money is saved when you factor in manifold and oil/water line costs and so on.

Long term, single would be cheaper from a servicing point of view (should you need to get it off more than once)

Twins are a mega pain to take on/off... so doing it more than once would bring the single infront from a cost point of view

wrong, stock blocks are known to split with around 300rwkw... want proof? i have one at home

yours also wrong in regards to the twins, it has been shown that even a t04z well set up will have less lagg than garrett replacement twins...

if 300rwkw is your goal i suggest a garrett 3076r or 3082r with a 0.8ish bum on a 6-boost manifold

You can split any block if you really want to try it.

Big RPM launches on sticky rubber, and you'll soon have that familiar coolant drip on the ground when you park it.

If you dont launch it hard, constantly etc, blocks will be fine.

There are that many people making over 300rwkw now on a factory RB26 block that any problems would be common as dog poo.

The more knowledgeable builders will make some changes to the block to stop this from happening, but there are a lot of backyard style builds who are only upgrading pistsons and similar without modding the block itself... And they hold fine is treated with some respect

do a search in this forum for small single turbo or SST

there was a big thread on this topic (started by me) in the last year or so. I had a similar thought, why not try a mid sized single to aim for just 300-350rwkw. lots of good responses in there.

fark since i'm nice here it is. http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/R3...ur-t139923.html

started nearly 2 years ago, but ran for a year. in the end I went silly and have ended up with:

tomei manifolds

HKS GT-SS

tomei dumps

HKS twin 75mm front pipes into single 4inch

greddy full suction kit

greddy hard pipe kit

ARC intercooler

single definitely would have been cheaper. I could get rid of the tomei mani's (~$1K), GT-SS (~$3K), tomei dumps ($700), Greddy suction kit ($1K), HKS front pipes ($700). that would leave $6400 to spend on a single set up (gate, mani, turbo, intake pipe, dump, front pipe, turbo to cooler pipe).

Where the twins have it all over singles is that most singles are single scroll - meaning one turbine nossle .

A twin scroll single achieves pretty much the same thing but requires one or preferably two external wastegates to control turbine speed - boost .

I doubt very much in the late 80's when Nissan was developing the RB26 that external wastegates even got a look in .

The next best thing is to run parallel twins with individual integral wastegates , it's the only way to keep the exhaust gasses seperate between the front and rear three cylinders until downstream of the turbos .

Either is whats required from a high performance turbo engine to get around reversion problems .

I'd say packaging was also an issue , I think it would be far easier to drop the shell over the engine/front subframe assembly on the production line with two small diameter turbochargers cuddled up close to the cylinder head .

I once though otherwise but the dollars and cents practicality on a road RB26 I think swing in favour of the parallel twins .

With a single you have to hope that the manifold you get is a good one and then there's the complexity and cost of external wastegate/s . Cops know what GTR's look like and often want a look under the lid - wouldn't you ?

If all they can see is what looks like a std motor they've got nothing on you . Explaining what those big HKS "EGR" valves are would be a bit more difficult .

The real shame of the twins is getting at them if you need to . If you do them once and do it right they should be fine after that . I reckon I'd be doing little things along the way to try and make it easier if there was a next time ...

Your calls , A .

^^ I've twins are better than that with the same power :D

But then someone could probably bring a better single graph and so the story goes

I agree with Cubes for the most part on the points... although the -5's are now making nearly 400rwkw now... so i'd say revise 360rwkw with 400rwkw :)

The twins are only about $500-$600 more expensive than a single Garrett (which is pretty interesting)

But the money is saved when you factor in manifold and oil/water line costs and so on.

Long term, single would be cheaper from a servicing point of view (should you need to get it off more than once)

Twins are a mega pain to take on/off... so doing it more than once would bring the single infront from a cost point of view

You can split any block if you really want to try it.

Big RPM launches on sticky rubber, and you'll soon have that familiar coolant drip on the ground when you park it.

If you dont launch it hard, constantly etc, blocks will be fine.

There are that many people making over 300rwkw now on a factory RB26 block that any problems would be common as dog poo.

The more knowledgeable builders will make some changes to the block to stop this from happening, but there are a lot of backyard style builds who are only upgrading pistsons and similar without modding the block itself... And they hold fine is treated with some respect

this motor isnt built, its standard from nissan...

i had a stock block with 430rwkw no problems, but it was prepped like u said. but once again i refer to the fact we are talking about a standard engine

need proof?? dude ive got a stock block...

made 300awkw no problems which more power than what urs made...

plus theres plenty more out there makin tons more

as for proof on twins.. its physics.. so unless u can break the laws of physics which u cant, then stfu

actually i made 430rwkw using a stock block, dont try a be a hero cause i have a bigger dick than you... my STOCK motor made 300rwkw

but without prep work a stock block will start struggling around 300-330rwkw

stfu is not a good argument, the fact is with a single you get twice the amount of force pushing on approx double the amount of mass, so in theroy there should not be a lot of difference at all. so the laws of physics actually state that they should be very similar

in practise they are similar, but twins have better response because of the small cast manifolds where singles have less lag and better top end power

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh yeah forgot to also mention need to also unplug the IACV as well. Thanks for the reminder @MBS206 Unplugging the TPS takes it out of closed loop so you're able to screw down the IACV without the ECU trying to add/subtract timing to maintain the idle (not sure PowerFC can even do this, but Nistune and the OEM definitely does)
    • For sale is my 1999 Nissan Skyline R34 GT-T, tuned to 234 kW / 313 hp. I've had the car for a few years as my daily driver. The car is original (as far as Skylines go), with only a few minor upgrades to enhance performance and driving experience, as typical for such a car of its age. Overall, it is in great condition with no body rust, thanks to its earlier import date. It features a top-notch security system (not literally, but it's great!) with remote start and still functional 4-wheel steering via HICAS. It comes with several performance and handling upgrades, including:     Hypergear 450HP Turbocharger running 17 PSI boost, installed mid-2021 by Jaustech     550cc injectors     Nistune ECU     Front-Mount Return-Flow Intercooler     X-Force Stainless Steel Exhaust     Upgraded engine mounts     Bottom end bearings replaced     BC Coilovers     Lenso DR1 rims     Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE003 TL 245/40R18 97W tires, fitted early 2023 The interior is mostly stock, with a few additions:     Viper Satellite Tracking System with remote start     Bluetooth Double-Din Touchscreen Head Unit     Steering wheel cover Cons:     A few paint imperfections here and there     Driver’s seat shows more wear than the others. It's not torn at all, but I've added a seat cover to protect its condition. I also have a CarVX Vehicle History report available for serious buyers, so you don’t need to purchase it yourself. Price: $26,000 ONO.
    • I've had two suzukis in the past have an extremely hard time turning over and not starting after sitting for a few weeks. Ended up the alternator would seize up causing the starter to force. Same issue both times.  Maybe they're sourcing their alternators from the same place...
    • Ah right. Maybe my rb just loves chewing through batteries lol.
    • On the R34 can't you just unplug the IACV? This is the way I've always done it on the R33. Disconnect IACV, get it idling around 650rpm, and then do a power reset on the ECU to get it to relearn idle (factory ECU).   The big reason no one has touched on as to why you'd want to get the base idle right, is that it means the computer needs to make smaller adjustments to get a good idle at 700-750rpm.   Also, cleaning the IACV won't normally make the car suddenly idle lower or higher. The main issue with the IACV gumming up is that the valve sticks. This means the inputs the ECU gives, aren't translating to changes in air flow. This can cause idle choppy ness as the ECU is now needing to give a lot of input to get movement, but then it moves too far, and then has to do the same in reverse, and it can mean the ECU can't catch stalls quickly either.
×
×
  • Create New...