Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Its a long shot question but I figure there are a few EFI specialists on here that mess around with more than just a power fc.

Im tring to find a reluctor sensor that I can use for a custom EFI installation. I need to be able to mount the sensor through the front of an engine case so it can trigger from trigger points on the front of the camshaft gear. It also needs to seal the hole that it will go through, so some sort of bolt through shape like a bolt, or I could cut a thread into the front of the engine block and screw the sensor in perhaps.

The sensor needs to be able to tolerate oil and engine temps up to 130 degrees or so at a maximum. I havent had any luck locating anything so far.

If not an actual engine position sensor I was also thinking of ABS sensors from some make or model of car would also probably be compatible.

Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions?

Cheers,

Ian

  Vspec R33 said:
Hi all,

Its a long shot question but I figure there are a few EFI specialists on here that mess around with more than just a power fc.

Im tring to find a reluctor sensor that I can use for a custom EFI installation. I need to be able to mount the sensor through the front of an engine case so it can trigger from trigger points on the front of the camshaft gear. It also needs to seal the hole that it will go through, so some sort of bolt through shape like a bolt, or I could cut a thread into the front of the engine block and screw the sensor in perhaps.

The sensor needs to be able to tolerate oil and engine temps up to 130 degrees or so at a maximum. I havent had any luck locating anything so far.

If not an actual engine position sensor I was also thinking of ABS sensors from some make or model of car would also probably be compatible.

Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions?

Cheers,

Ian

Use a MoTeC one...ill get you a part number tomm.

Is the sensor your thinking of the first one on the list on the motec sensor page. (below) Its exactly the sort of thing the sensor needs to be physically to fit and mount properly, but its hall effect not reluctor. The engine runs a closed dry sump system so the sensor has to seal to the case properly.

http://motec.com.au/sensors/crankcamspeed/

Ive been trying to get a data sheet on this sensor but havent had any luck so far. My concern is if it can handle the heat for a long period of time considering the oil bath it will be getting.

Have you considered using the GT101 hall effect sensor with an external chopper disc running behind the crank timing sprocket? This is probably the most effective way to setup something like you are talking about. Has been done many many times before and is really quite simple to do.

Motec now have a forum monitored by Motec Australia staff, no doubt someone there can answer your question:

http://www.motec.com.au/forum/

Please post up any info here, this interests me as well. :ermm: Thanks and good luck.

  3lit3 32 said:
Have you considered using the GT101 hall effect sensor with an external chopper disc running behind the crank timing sprocket? This is probably the most effective way to setup something like you are talking about. Has been done many many times before and is really quite simple to do.

Crank triggering wont allow me to run sequential injection though, which is needed due to the size of the injectors on the engine. It wound end up with low end miss fires and a crap idle AFR. Its got to be cam based triggering.

  Chris Wilson said:
Motec now have a forum monitored by Motec Australia staff, no doubt someone there can answer your question:

http://www.motec.com.au/forum/

Please post up any info here, this interests me as well. :ermm: Thanks and good luck.

Yep i've already posted on their forum, and am waiting on a reply. I'll let you know how it goes.

  666DAN said:
Will this one do? ebay Item number: 310096063652

Electrically speaking it probably would, but the wires coming out of the sensor dont look very industrial. Most automotoive sensors are a lot more ruggard with the wiring, The risk of breaking the wire off at the top of the sensor is a little high.

  Vspec R33 said:
Crank triggering wont allow me to run sequential injection though, which is needed due to the size of the injectors on the engine. It wound end up with low end miss fires and a crap idle AFR. Its got to be cam based triggering.

Then put in on the cam as well. What system are you using for management?

  3lit3 32 said:
Then put in on the cam as well. What system are you using for management?

V500 wolf. Your meaning running a sync and reference setup i presume? Yes thats possible but it still means putting a sensor through the front of the block to trigger from the camshaft gear. (single camshaft pushrod engine). So im still stuck with a need for a reliable at 100+ degree temp sensor.

Edited by Vspec R33
  blind_elk said:
Wolf will have an appropriate sensor setup to work for you. Talk to Robbie there.

Already have, and he's chasing the datasheet from the manufacturer for their hall sensor too. Still no luck in hearing from them yet though.

Ideally you would have two sensors, one on the crank and one on the cam. The crank sensor dictates the injector and ignition timing, and the cam sensor seta the sequence, this way the movement stops the timing jumping around with the timing chain.

  Adriano said:
Ideally you would have two sensors, one on the crank and one on the cam. The crank sensor dictates the injector and ignition timing, and the cam sensor seta the sequence, this way the movement stops the timing jumping around with the timing chain.

True but the cam in this engine is gear driven. Lash would be about 2-3 thou so barely worth mentioning as far as an effect on drifting igniton timing.

I was going to use the dual pulse method as it can be done on the cam gear with just one sensor, and it gives me the full sequential operation i need.

The distributor is being removed from this engine to make more engine bay space. There will be a dry sump pump mounted where the distributor normally is. Its a VW horizontally opposed 4 cylinder engine.

Edited by Vspec R33
  Vspec R33 said:
True but the cam in this engine is gear driven. Lash would be about 2-3 thou so barely worth mentioning as far as an effect on drifting igniton timing.

I was going to use the dual pulse method as it can be done on the cam gear with just one sensor, and it gives me the full sequential operation i need.

The cam sensor isn't used in ignition firing events or injection timing events - in most high end ecu's so if the sync drifts a bit its no big deal. Its usually only used for the initial sync.

  rob82 said:
The cam sensor isn't used in ignition firing events or injection timing events - in most high end ecu's so if the sync drifts a bit its no big deal. Its usually only used for the initial sync.

This is an entirely custom application with 4 points at 60 degrees BTDC for each cylinder, and 1 ref at 50 degrees BTDC cylinder 1. This is called dual pulse triggering in the case of the Wolf ecu. Yes its got nothing directly to do with injection or ignition, its all sensing crank position and ECU timing. The last time did this kind of installation I used an optic sensor in the distributor with 5 slots cut in it as described, but no distributor this some, ergo triggering directly from the camshaft drive gear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Price seems pretty good to me. Also seems a hell of a lot cheaper then buying another vehicle that only ever gets used for towing.  I'm a long way from you mate, I'm a couple of hours out of Brizzy. 
    • New [400]Z, they're available in manual and you don't have to worry about parts scarcity. 
    • Just planning to have the wiring neat and hide as much as possible.
    • The sodium acetate, mixed with citric acid, doesn't actually buffer each other. Interestingly though, if you used Sodium Acetate, and acetic acid, THAT becomes a buffer solution. Additionally, a weak acid that can attack a metal, is still a weak acid that can attack a metal. If you don't neutralise it, and wash it off, it's going to be able to keep attacking. It works the same way when battery acid dries, get that stuff somewhere, and then it gets wet, and off it goes again breaking things down. There's a reason why people prefer a weak acid, and it's because they want TIME to be able to be on their side. IE, DIY guys are happy to leave some mild steel in vinegar for 24 hours to get mill scale off. However, if you want to do it chemically in industry, you grab the muriatic acid. If you want to do it quicker at home, go for the acetic acid if you don't want muriatic around. At the end of the day, look at the above thumbnail, as it proves what I said in the earlier post, you can clean that fuel tank up all you want with the solution, but the rust that has now been removed was once the metal of the fuel tank. So how thin in spots is your fuel tank getting? If the magazine on the left, is the actual same magazine as on the right, you'll notice it even introduces more holes... Well, rust removal in general actually does that. The fuel tank isn't very thick. So, I'll state again, look to replace the tank, replace the fuel hanger, and pump, work out how the rust and shit is making it past the fuel filter, and getting into the injectors. That is the real problem. If the fuel filter were doing its job, the injectors wouldn't be blocked.
    • Despite having minimal clothing because of the hot weather right now, I did have rubber gloves and safety glasses on just in-case for most of the time. Yes, I was scrubbing with my gloves on before, but brushing with a brush removes the remaining rust. To neutralize, I was thinking distilled water and baking soda, or do you think that would be overkill?
×
×
  • Create New...