Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if 243Hp @ the wheels on 10psi with the current setup is decent as i just got a dyno tune today and not sure what i should expect out of my stock turbo. So if you got a stock turbo or running an safc cos i'd like to see how much i can squeeze out my safc.

could you post your dyno results! dyno graphs also if available =)

mods are

-autobahn fmic

-3" hks dragger

-walbro pump

-apexi induction

-safc2

cheers

post-54106-1225980503_thumb.jpg

I got my car tuned yesterday And she pulled 179KW ( 240hp )

Running-

Blitz Intercooler

APEXi RSM Metre

APEXi SAFC metre

Splitfire Coilpacks

Full Jasma 3" Stainless exhaust

Only running standard boost till i get a Boost controller...

Yeah that right on the money having a power fc with those mods wont make alot of difference power wise.

Bumping up to 12-14psi wont improve power on stock turbo, wouldnt be good for turbo either. It will improve mid range however.

^

^

280hp would be bs for these mods John

280hp would be bs for these mods John
beg the differ seen plenty of "happy" 33's make 270 272 276 278 hp on many occasions just depends of where you go, you all know the story...

next mods should be

high flow cat

pfc

z32 afm

bosch pump (get rid of the walbro item but it will do for now)

decent clutch if not changed already..

i have around 200rwkw on a stock turbo ran on a mainline dyno . i know running 13 psi isn't great for it but hasn't died yet. waiting for turbo to choke it self soo i have a good excuse to install my new one in. but still waiting for it to die :D and its not showing any signs so far of it giving up.

put it on a happy dynodynamics dyno and u will get 280hp on stock turbo.

Edited by tets

have you got a graph showing a/f mix? its sounds pretty right but you could bump it up to 12psi for a little extra power. mine made 200kw on 12psi but I have a jap remaped ecu picking up the timming.

very happy!!!

after the tune, to be honest i wasn't very happy at all with the results because the car felt like it pulled more before the tune.

i thought to myself.."this cant be, it's just been tuned..the car can only get better not worst"

not being able to convince myself i got the tools out after work and popped the bonnet open.

- intercooler piping..check! (all tight)...

- vacuum lines had no apparent cracks and also sprayed a little amount of water, no bubbling..UNTIL i got to the bov vacuum line,

few bubbles starting to appear, looked closer and it had alot of cracks and visible wearing. cut a piece off and refitted, and then also saw that the hoseclamp wasn't tightened. it was LOOSE, i could pull it right off.

- stock bov..wiggled it around abit, what the? its shaking and then pop went the top bolt into my coilpacks, got the sucker and tightened it back on.

- everything else seemed fine so i went for a drive

it pulls like a train now!!!!

not sure why my tuner didnt pick it up though?

quite angry cos now it means it was just a waste of a tune..would it be best to get another tune?

Edited by Richy08

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...