Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A followup to let you know I spoke to the auto electrician and he said that a bosch sensor with a Nissan plug on it probably does exist, but its likely it won't be as cheap as the EL one just because of the volume Ford ones made in.

The EL one is installed in my R33 and running like a champ. The stumbling and flat spots I was getting at part throttle after a cold sart is gone. The light misfire (pops) at certain points when lifting off the throttle at 2-4k rpm is gone. And I've still got better fuel economy to look forward to.

Heres an interesting link, specifically this part about our O2 sensors: http://www.gt-skyline.net/maintenance/oxyg...gen_sensor.html . The important part is that Nissan recommends changing it at 40k km intervals. Every mechanic I've been to has said my O2 sensor was fine on basis of

  • 1) the ecu diagnostic didn't complain.
  • 2) a voltmeter responds when hooked up.

Both ways of testing are incorrect! My old O2 sensor was still operating when I pulled it out, but it's response time was so slow it was as good as dead. It goes without saying that buying a second hand O2 sensor is not a good idea.

4door_sleeper, doesn't look like it has made any difference :D

Yes i had to cut wires. Chop both plugs off and then wire them up. Unfortunately the sensor i bought had different coloured wires to my sensor. Luckily i had a friend good with electronics and the GTR Workshop manual, so we were able to work it out. (I think)

I have replaced AFM, O2 sensor, done full service (apart from spark plugs) and ran 2 injector cleaners through it. Im still experincing poor fuel economy.

R32 GTST auto, pod, 11 psi and i get ~350km to a tank.

Hey GRADENKO,

I have looked at an R31 RB30 sensor.

They have the same amount of wires, (though only two wires are the same colour from memory), & the EXACT same plug, which makes things a lot easier to connect instead of cutting and re-joining wires. As for the threads, I will compare both tomorrow. If its the same as the EF sensor, then I cant see why it wont go in, unless somethings drastically different.

When I spoke to NGK they told me this could happen as the o2 sensor isn't designed for the application.

How about a VLT o2 sensor? Is it a different part number to the VL NA sensor? If there different then we know that the o2 sensors for turbo need to be different due to the extra heat and some times fuel that dumps past them?!?

Heat isn't a factor. A lean running N/A engine will actually be hotter than your average, rich turbo engine. Don't forget that the turbo works off heat and will absorb up to 100degC from exhaust gas running through it. Our common zirconia oxygen sensors have an operating temp of 350-900degC (corresponding with the average working range of an engine), and I'm sure they're built to last much higher temps.

AFAIK, the only things that kill an O2 sensor are age and leaded fuel. Running rich on (premium) unleaded shouldn't affect its life.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well finally got to check the sensors, with the following outcomes;

1) VL Turbo & NA motors run exact same oxy sensor (same part number and same as 3.0lt Skyline.)

2) The threads between Skyline & EA-EF oxy sensors different, with skyline type being bout half the size as Ford type.

3) Ford type, even though bigger than Skyline type, is still smaller than the one fitted (in my car at least). I have a custom dump pipe off the turbo.

So it sems back to the drawing board for me @ least!

Guys who have fitted Ford sensor, do you still have the factory dump pipe/exhaust, or did you custom fit it?

Hope it helps.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
×
×
  • Create New...