Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

id go Jap stuff, but thats just me. Pipercross doesnt have panel filters for Skylines

just clean your current one

Lol, of course they have a filter to fit the skyline, just ask for this one:

Outside Length: 280mm

Outside Width: 165mm

Height: 28mm

To fit,

Nissan S15/14 200SX,S13 180SX,Pulsar GTiR,N14 N15,Skyline R32,R33,R34

Subaru WRX,

Commodore VL-VS V6&V8

Hmmm, if you say "Holden VS" or similar you'll get the right filter, although I had the same issue when calling around, had to say it was the same as a Holden VS filter...

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Did you have a decent hi-flow panel filter in there before?

My guess is stock nissan or similar, so of course your going to notice a minor difference going from crap to a decent flowing filter setup.

If stock airboxes can make 400rwkw on BIG GTR's (with the side airbox restrictor thingo removed for the flow in R34's)

Good enough for run of the mill setups below that, plenty of threads on it, Dezz even posted some dyno results which showed such little difference it wasnt worth going pods due to factoring in increased intake temps

Stock filter on the car when purchased, no idea how old but by looked old, so i went from an old stock to a new pod, the minor difference may have been the same just by putting a decent panel filter or maybe even just replacing the stockie? Will probably go back to a good brand panel filter soon, hoping to reduce the induction noise and after reading your quote above about the increase intake temps thats the last thing I need living in Queensland.

Apex-i panel filter (or similar non oiled filter) in the stock airbox...

Been using one in my car since the beginning, and still doing the job with the current power output....No issues with response whatsoever.

Apex-i panel filter (or similar non oiled filter) in the stock airbox...

Been using one in my car since the beginning, and still doing the job with the current power output....No issues with response whatsoever.

Thanks dezz!

Any idea where i can find one? Are they on Just Jap or somewhere else?

Always ordered mine from Nengun in the past...they're good for about 25,000km so 1 a year would be more than enough for most people...

I'm sure Just Jap or similar would sell them...Never really checked. A trader on here (Kudos maybe) also had some at one stage....I might have even got my last one off him come to think of it...

Blitz also sell a non oiled panel filter, but I've never used it personally.

Thats like banging your mrs backdoor and not using the lubricant. lolz

LOL!

I have lost count on how many sexual reference comments you have made.

I wanna goto Centrefold Lounge, havent been there before... :)

Ofcourse they do!

http://roccosperformance.com.au/shop/index...products_id=308

But I don't know whether to get this, or the Apexi one for a few dollars more

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...em=110308208089

or to just stick with the one I have which is about 25000kms old. :)

id go Jap stuff, but thats just me. Pipercross doesnt have panel filters for Skylines

just clean your current one

Edited by webng
Lol, of course they have a filter to fit the skyline, just ask for this one:

Outside Length: 280mm

Outside Width: 165mm

Height: 28mm

To fit,

Nissan S15/14 200SX,S13 180SX,Pulsar GTiR,N14 N15,Skyline R32,R33,R34

Subaru WRX,

Commodore VL-VS V6&V8

Hmmm, if you say "Holden VS" or similar you'll get the right filter, although I had the same issue when calling around, had to say it was the same as a Holden VS filter...

opoos didnt read it thoroughly :yucky:, now this may be some good panel filter.

+1 not using oil filter , i have a mint 1 laying around red foam oily. didn't want to use it so i bought a blitz one..

im just going to throw this out there but i had a stocko box and now have an eclosed box and the only reason i did this is not because i noticed some neck snapping increase in power but because i like the sound =)

Stock filter on the car when purchased, no idea how old but by looked old, so i went from an old stock to a new pod, the minor difference may have been the same just by putting a decent panel filter or maybe even just replacing the stockie? Will probably go back to a good brand panel filter soon, hoping to reduce the induction noise and after reading your quote above about the increase intake temps thats the last thing I need living in Queensland.

well that confirms exactly what i thought.

Going from a unknown stock filter to a pod is of course going to give you something of a gain.

Hell the filter in there could have been 5+ years old!

I can help with an A'PEXi panel for $101.20 delivered via Express Post, these can be found within the following thread within our trader section:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/A-...-R-t244157.html

just wanna add that now that its summer, my under bonnet temps get very hot now, i have an in cabin thermommetrer that reads the temp around the pod filter and its been getting up to nearly 70degrees celcius, a massive decrease in power on these hot days and i tend to use more fuel aswell, on open roads or cold days the air intake temp is the same as the atmosphere temp,,,,, I got an apexi pod that is uncovered and i believe i would benefit from the stock box with highflow panel or an enclosed pod that is shielded from some of the engine and turbo heat. But for on the track i cannot see how the heat would effect the air intake temps purely because of the amount of cold air being thrown into the engine bay at high speeds.....

drifting is another story completely and if i was to drift allot i would definately shield the pod or put standard box back in...

well that confirms exactly what i thought.

Going from a unknown stock filter to a pod is of course going to give you something of a gain.

Hell the filter in there could have been 5+ years old!

Decided to test the difference yesterday, took the car out for around 30 min with the pod for some semi spirited driving with an outside temp of 28 deg (10.30.am). Then came home opened the bonnet, waited for it to cool, ripped off the pod, mounted the original filter box assembely completely as standard, standard flat panel filter (The original one i took out) and took her out for another spin. Took about 50min to change over all up and be back in the car. This was for my own testing purpose only and i can't say it will be the same for everyone but...........she is running fantastic in my opinion i have actually improved it by going back to the panel and it's not even new. Note that i had no form of CIA and the pod was just sitting in the engine bay where the box was, also i have the std intercooler so there was no holes under the pod either. The biggest improvement overal was sound, for me i think when i put the pod on the induction sound was so loud (all i could hear in the cabin) you just thought that performance was increased but now i can hear the exhaust note perfect and the sweet, sweet sound of that turbo winding up :P . Thankx heaps for the advice R31Nismoid i would have just considered the pod to be better before reading about the temp affects.

50 mins to put the stock Airbox back in?? LOL did you use your teeth? haha.

Iv just done the same thing, i switched back to Stock Dump/Front because the JJR piece of shit split was causing so much trouble. Now its running perfect.

At the same time i put my stock airbox and an Apexi panel filter in (had the Apexi Pod)

Overall im dam impressed. The sound is so much better, hear that turbo spool, and if your that way inclined, you can still hear induction and the BOV too. Think ill stick to the panel filter from now on. I like it.

i have a pod filter set up now, made a custom box and trimmed top half of airbox to fit the box.... for cold air as i have the stock cooler in my r34.........i prefer the sound of the pod and there is abit more response.......i was using a blitz sus power non oiled panel filter which was and improvement on stock item.......wont be going back to it now as i have hacked my airbox lol........anyone want the blitz filter drop me a pm and come pick it up! its like new..:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...