Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The GT-R had finally broken the 10 second barrier! Congratulation to d3gtr from the nagtroc forums - Amazing! Well done :(

d3gtr:

Just to let everybody know the Jotech D3GTR ran the fastest recorded time (that I know of) at the Texas Motorplex in Ennis, TX. The ¼ mile time recorded was 10.956 seconds (first GTR to break 11 seconds!!!). Oh and get this it was done on 22 inch wheels, three piece wheels. This was done directly after the Hot Import Showdown held at this track – which was an absolutely incredible event that I will not miss in the future. Cliff you did a great job!

I am extremely excited of the performance of this car and give a great thanks to Kenny Tran and the guys Jotech Motorsports in Garland, Texas, for the absolutely incredible job they did with the modifications, dedication, follow up and just damn good work they did with my car. Kenny and I spoke many times over the weekend by phone and he gave me different instructions and opinions on how to get the best time. What’s the chances Kenny would know how to run a quarter…LOL.

I am on my way home from the track and will arrive at in about 3 hours. I will either post video and time slip tonight or tomorrow.

I Freaking Love This Car!!!!!

D3

Running an HKS GT570 kit, Mine’s Exhaust, and the COBB Tuning AccessPORT. It’s making 548 hp and 573 lb/ft of torque.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4Tfjz0U3C4

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/245222-1st-gt-r-in-the-10s/
Share on other sites

the owner/driver has commented and says "the transmission is fine"

I suspect someone either trying to be funny, or a jeleous Porsche driver trying to put shit on a better car (maybe the person he was racing lol).

B.

Anyone notice the comment posted about the video?

Apparently the transmission is gone now in that car.

i noticed that when i saw it this morning, but realised the comment about the transmission was made by another account to the person that posted the video....

AnimalHouseRacing 10.88 @133.50 " NO LAUNCH CONTROL"

I would like to announce that the Animal House Racing GTR went 10.88 @133.50 today.

I would like to thank everyone at Cobb tuning for there custom program. Thank you JOHN

We are still running the same map as all the other passes, running a steady 17psi.

We did not use launch control at all.

The setup for the GTR is as fallows:

AHR CERAMIC WHEEL BEARINGS

AHR CERAMIC PULLEY BEARINGS

AHR THERMAL GASKET SET

AHR RACE Y PIPE

COBB ACCESS PORT

93 PUMP GAS w/1 gallon 100 oct

We believe the car has more in her but the track is closed for the season.

Thank you all at Nagtroc for the support

Stay tuned for next year with our AHR Godzilla turbo kit

Slip

60' 1.858

330 4.768

1/8 7.137

MPH 106.08

1/4 10.88

MPH 133.50

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/Animal-...1088_201390.htm

http://www.nagtroc.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=26624

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...